tobias_kohlhauf

And thanks also for this reply. But as you see: I'm interested in the difference between the two profiles as Cura offer them both. Yeah, it's made for the Ultimaker.. but i was hoing for a professional quick look inside the profiles if there is something obviouse that makes them so different.

Thanks for the cool reply @Slashee_the_Cow! Do you know if acceleration in this matter means the physical acceleration of the motors so like way x speed²? Or just the speed multiplied by some acceleration value? Cause the first option would mean that only the "push" to the desired speed would be much faster with the S5. But i couldn't imagine that is brings down the (infill-)time so much as i saw in the comparison.

EDIT: I changes the pattern to "ZigZag", as it looked different between the two printers when using "lines". Now they look the same and the travel speed is equal with both printers. Still the whole printing time difference is the same (Ender ~5h // Ultimaker ~3h), now the difference is all in the infill time (Ender ~3h // Ultimaker ~1h). And still i checked all the infill options.. all the same at both printers. 😞

Hi there! Normally i use Cura to slice prints with my Ender 3 V2 Neo. Yesterday i was using a Ultimaker S5 instead, but for the same small part to print out. Use nearly the same parameters, the print time was supprisingly almost just the half as with my Ender. So after the print i was looking in to it more deep. I tried to use now the exact same configuration (walls, print speed, travel, etc..) and had still the 50% time difference. Checking the info-sign right beside the printing time tells me that the difference comes from both the Travel and Infill (which is in both configuartions 100%, lines) I attached the screenshots. Any ideas what else i can check where this difference comes from and how i could reach the (almost) same time with my Ender?