Jump to content

mr.-waldorf

Dormant
  • Posts

    172
  • Joined

  • Last visited

    Never

Posts posted by mr.-waldorf

  1. Wow some really great prints lately.

    @Mr. Waldorf, the detail in those prints looks amazing! I didn't buy a UM2 to print out sexy ladies, but I'm definitely going to for *cough* test prints :mrgreen: Also, what material are those motor shields fiberglass?

     

    Hi Aaron, Thanks

    It's film sticker carbon fiber. It is the same material used by the guys in car tuning to cover the hood. Works very well.

    Cheers

     

  2. Hi Guys,

    More bad news, after 2 days without any changes, the underextrusion is back. Can't go over 6mm3/s and changing the flow % doesn't make any difference

    WP 000184

    other day test with 100% Flow (failed at 4mm3/s)

     

    WP 000183

    other day test with 90% Flow (passed at 10mm3/s)

     

    WP 000181

    Today test with 100% Flow (failed at 6mm3/s)

     

    WP 000182

    Today test with 90% Flow (failed at 6mm3/s)

     

    There wasn't no diferences between tests, even the room temperature was the same...

     

  3. Hi

    My latest prints. hope you like...

    WP 000170

    0.1layer;30mm/s;230ºC

    WP 000171

    WP 000172

    0.1layer;30mm/s;221ºC

     

    WP 000173

     

    WP 000176

    0.08layer;20mm/s;230ºC

     

    WP 000174

    red ABS and it's painted

     

    WP 000175

    red ABS and it's painted

     

    WP 000177

    red ABS and it's painted

    Hey, Don't forget the "like" button :mrgreen:

    Cheers

     

  4. Hi Guys

    Another thought after openning a fine American apple cider! So if you think is stupid, I will claim that I was under the influence :blink:

    What about bowden tube lenght? Can a bigger bowden tube increase the springiness effect and cause the motor backwards steps? Can someone with good extrusion rates measure the bowden for comparison?

    Edited: Stefan have you seen already the nozzle hole(inside) with a magnifying glass?

     

  5. I am so sorry. Damn your printer is haunted!!

    Maybe that hole in the filament tip is from a clog inside the nozzle. maybe abs or other garbadge from the extruder?on other end it's so perfect shape maybe Robert is right and it's from a air bubble. Dumping the nozzle in acetone for a while it's a good idea.

     

    I will try three more things before I dump this printer:

     

     

    Well, any good show must end with a bang, so maybe this litle guy can help?

    Crazy Harry

    (can´t upload new photos...)

     

    Just kidding. Hey cheer up! Keep up the good work and you will find what is causing the problem

     

     

  6. Hi Shafe,

    Love the topic. I am a HUGE RC fan and as former airborne soldier, I have a special affection for the

    Bug smasher (Herky bird) It's the Portuguese airborne mule!

    Wow, what a project! This is a huge project, I am impressed!! I am also used to build my planes and most recently I printed some detailed parts for my F-16 cockpit.

    I suspect that the weight will be a big problem. If I ever have the courage for a project of this size I would build the wings with the traditional method and print all the rest, meanwhile I will follow your thread closely and try to learn with your mistakes and surely I will be glad to help if and when necessary.

    Hey can't wait for the 1º flight video :cool:

    Have fun

     

  7. This whole 90% flow thing is very intriguing. It doesn't make sense to me so it is unexpected and interesting and likely important.

    Usually the 90% extrusion is caused by the filament slipping the tiniest bit as each tooth digs into the filament and it slips a little. So the stepper is turning at the 100% correct value but the filament is moving at 90% of desired value. So the stepper doesn't know the filament is slipping.

    The whole 90% flow thing is more likely to have something to do with how the filament leaves the nozzle and flows into the corners of the part. With 90% flow it doesn't quite fill a layer completely so there is a tiny space to move into when it is done and there is significantly less pressure.

    Have any of you tried to increase the current? It is a trivial single gcocde command. I tried it and my filament ground to dust.

     

    Hi George

    As always very usefull info. Thanks

    I thought that reducing the Flow % would reduce some pressure and that could improve the extrusion. I think that this is not the solution of my underextrusion problem but this way I could achieve the 10mm3/s. There is more users that could overcame the underextrusion changing the flow % (Shurik was suceed with 80% flow) I can't find any fault on the nozzle head so I will try to increase the current.

    Right now I feel as in the begining, and don't now if I have over pressure in the bowden or if is the stepper motor that can't manage "normal" pressures.

    Are you always running with higher current, or you just changed to test?

    Thanks

     

  8. Hi Nico

    Before changing the teflon coupler try printing the extrusion test with 90% flow

    With 100% flow I have underextrusion at 4 - 5mm3/s and with 90% flow I Made 10mm3/s without underextrusion.

    It's a way to overcame the motor jumps backwards and of course the underextrusion.

    Should be very interesting if you have the same results as I and after that you could change the teflon coupler and test the extrusion rate again with 100% flow

     

  9. Hi Anders Thanks.

     

    On my UM2, the hole in the chassis plate was not deep enough to fit the nut.

    This made the stepper motor sit with a slight angle.

    The resulting angle on the motor shaft moved the knurled gear away from the ball bearing.

     

    Not the case here.

     

    Regarding the filament spool holder, there was an extra "knob" delivered with my UM2. The manual said nothing about it, but using it as a guide for the filament improved feeding (before i found the nut behind the stepper motor):

     

    (the knob in the lower left corner)

     

    the filament guide even horsted the underextrusion

    Print illuminarti´s extrusion test at 230ºC. Maybe you have underextrusion but you didn´t notice because you are printing with lower extrusion rates if not it's always interesting to know that there is UM2 that can achieve higher extrusion rates

     

  10. Hi Aaron,

    I made the extrusion test with the filament out of the bowden tube just running free in my hand and the motor didn´t jump backwards

    Made a second extrusion test and I tried to push the filament with my hand and then with a pliers and the motor didn´t step backwards. I was able to stop the filament and the motor just chewed the filament.

    Not the results that I was expecting... and I am not sure if this test results can mislead us

    I will repeat this test more times to see if there is consistency in the results

     

  11. Right before the stepper motor jumps backwards it seems to be a slight increase in nozzle pressure. That´s the reason why if we deacrease the flow we can avoid a litle bit the underextrusion. But doesn´t mean that the filament is not being able to flow out of the nozzle creating more back pressure. To me it seems that there is more back pressure but only due to higher flow rates and the stepper motor is underpowered.

    I have the feeling that the problem isn´t the nozzle head but the stepper motor or motor driver/Board. Meanhile I have to prove that! :mrgreen:

     

  12. HA HA! Caught on camera on Valentine's day...

    The underextrusion occurs at:

    3.23s

    4.03s

    4.30

    4.50

    5.23

    Illuminarti's UM2 - Extrusion Test 3-10mm3

    UM Gold PLA

    230ºC

    Test failed at 4mm3/s

    The stepper motor is jumping backwards it seems a defective or underpowered stepper motor.

     

    think I have to further investigate, but not today. Happy valentine's day!

     

  13. Hi Shurik,

    Put more tension into the bed springs and make sure that the springs are straight

    Repeat several times the level wizard because when you adjust one screw some times changes the bed level and you need to fine tune the others.

    Printing with 0.1mm inicial layer can be hard sometimes so as last resort you can try 0.2mm inicial layer

    Be careful too much tension on the springs is also not good

     

  14. Waiting... my least developed character trait :)

     

    :lol: :lol: :lol:

     

    Personally, I don't believe that it is the extruder. This thing is strong enough.

     

    I don't believe that is the extruder either, after some tweaks works fine.

     

    . Or the board/stepper driver is broken and doesn't provide enough current at times. Looking at the last underextruded piece, the regular underextrusion pattern might indicate such a problem.

     

    I was looking more carefull to the extrusion test photos, trying to understand your correlation. I can´t make that assumption/correlation just because of the regular pattern. However I agree with you, the source of the underextrusion problem could be there.

    I noticed that between underextrusions you have a few layers well printed (no underextrusion) which sends a little bit my nozzle theory down the drain. If the nozzle didn't have enough time to heat the filament at higher speeds It shouldn't have good extrusion between underextrusions.

     

    Or maybe it is way less intricate and there is "only" some electrical interference due to a broken/damaged wire between the stepper and the board.

     

    Don't think so! This is not an isolate problem on your printer. Did you noticed the views/replays of this thread? This is a widespread problem...

     

    Been there, done that.

    I now use an exquisite swiss_design™ filament spool holder (courtesy of Robert - link). But I still experience underextrusion (another hint that it is not the extruder in my case).

     

    Wow RESPECT Robert!! Awesome design and it works great. I will print one ;) Thanks

     

  15. Hey Nico, we are dead in the water again!!

    It seems that you have the correct nozzle diameter and gr5 only can make some measurements on monday. This will not help your problem but could explain george's extrusion rates, if he has a bigger nozzle hole.

    I saw that Ultimaker R/D team posted some comments on "Ultimaker2 Extuder System - Improvements and Ideas" topic so it seems that they also suspect of the extruder being the cause of some problems. Since they didn´t post anything here I can imagine that they don´t share with some of us the theory that a smaller nozzle hotzone is also causing the underextrusion at higher speeds.

    I really hope that new teflon coupler can solve your underextrusion problem, but i really don't believe it

    Meanwhile you realy have to change your UM2 rear, get a lazy susan or other way to feed the filament, because the stock way definitely cause underextrusion at higher speeds

     

  16. I certainly think the extruder is at least part of the problem and I'm following the "Ultimaker2 Extuder System - Improvements and Ideas" thread with interest.

     

    I certainly agree with you on this, and those guys are making a very nice job...

     

    The side by side result is very much in line with Illuminarti's results way back in this thread in posts #154 and #163. His was with Colorfabb instead of Faberdashery against UM Blue.

     

    Funny... I thought that Ultimaker filament was from Colorfabb, my mistake.

     

×
×
  • Create New...