mr.-waldorf
-
Posts
172 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Never
Content Type
Forums
Events
3D Prints
Posts posted by mr.-waldorf
-
-
Hi Skint,
Congratulations! You have the best printer on the Market and is working well.
I know that you have your printer at short time but it seems that some users report problems after some use, hopefully this is not the case and that you have a perfect condition printer
Many thanks for the tests and the posts
Cheers
-
Hi Woofysplace,
Please see http://umforum.ultimaker.com/index.php?/topic/4542-comedoone-for-ultimaker2/page-3,(#41) because we both think that increasing the current may worsen the problems in the near future (we can be wrong, it's to soon to draw any conclusions)
-
Hey guys, before I go jabbering on again I just wanted to say I view this thread as a casual conversation with ya'll, and that I'm not trying to spam it with ideas or cause confusion. I hope you view it likewise . We have meetings at work where we try to figure stuff out and all types of ideas are thrown around, I think it really helps to see things from many different points of view.
I consider your comments as a casual conversation, we just discuss possible scenarios and possible culprits. This is very usefull, please keep the "jabbering".
Has anyone downloaded the datasheet for the precision resistors gr5 posted?
I thought the Derating Curve on page two of the resistor datasheet was interesting. If the ambient temp get's above 70C the rated power of the resistor plummets; perhaps heating up the resistor and then running 0.078 watts through it is slowly damaging the thing.
Up to 70C the resistors can facilitate 0.125 watts; with 1.25 Amps going through them at a nominal resistance of 0.05 ohms they are only facilitating 0.0781 watts. But if they are heated up too much and the power rating starts to drop off, perhaps trying to pump 0.078 watts through them is slowly killing them. It's hard to tell from the graph but it looks like at about 80C the resistors are only at 60% their power rating, which would be 0.075 watts.
I downloaded the resistors datasheet and I totally agree with your thoughts and I also agree that increasing the current may worse the problem
Today I can't make more tests because I have to finish some "homework", but tommorow I will return to the attack
So Aaron keep the jabbering comming because they are very smart deductions.
-
I've been able to induce failure by deliberately loading fairly tightly coiled filament in such a was as to maximize the tension on the filament in the bowden tube.
Totally agree. the exact same thing over here
-
===
gr5 edit: waldorf lets post summary here:
no problem: gr5, waldorf, takei,illuminarti
problem:mostlyAtomicBob, NicoLinux
Good idea George. I Will try to update the summary.
My own UM2 was also much better when I first got it. PLA used to pour from the nozzle at the start of a print leaving a long trail up to the start point. It was fine right up to my first nozzle clog and has been struggling ever since. Now its usually 100mm around the brim before the flow gets going.
Hi Woofysplace, should I add your printer to the problems list? maybe after you check the nozzle?
-
Thanks Takei
I had similar experience.
Congratulations you have the best printer on the market
-
Hi All,
Some UM2 users are reporting under-extrusion problems, did you already tested your printer extrusion rates? You can download the *extrusion test here and should be printed at 230ºC
Should be interesting to know if this is a widespread problem or just a few isolated problems
Please post your results this can help you and others
Thanks
===
No problem: gr5, Waldorf, Takei, illuminarti, Skint, Shurik, IRobertI (@1.5A), Rabanwin, MostlyAtomicBob(@teflon coupler), braddock(@new bowden tube), CanadaDrones(@friction free spool), Arska, colorfabb(@loosening the 4 screws on the print head), Pikey, Stuart838, Nicolinux(@new printer), Didier_Klein, WoofysPlace (new nozzle), Ju1050, tomkooij, Calimero, ProfePaco
problem: MostlyAtomicBob, NicoLinux, Woofysplace, IRobertI, braddock, CanadaDrones, Geeks, colofabb, Shafe, Das_ENGINER
*Many thanks to illuminarti, it was him who made the extrusion test
illuminarti edit: For context, here's the link to the original posting of the test piece.
-
Shoot, I knew it seemed to good to be true; the temp on the board increasing to the exact stated Absolute Max Ratings Ambient Temp, then failing.
In the exact some milisecond when the temp changed from 85,0ºC to 85,1ºC the underextrusion occurs. I really have to repeat this test because its a very big coincidence...
-
Second extrusion test at 230ºC and 22,0ºC room temperature with ventilation and without the board cover
Board temps (measured as close to behind the chip and resistors as possible)
Start (idle) 22,0ºC
In the end of heating up process: 26,0ºC
1º Layer 3mm3/s: 27,5ºC
1ª layer 4mm3/s: 27,5ºC
1º layer 5mm3/s: 27,5ºC
1º layer 6mm3/s: 27,6ºC
Failed at 6,5mm3/s: 28,1ºC
Made the test twice and they failed in the same way.
Tomorow I will check my nozzle for any clogs just to be sure
I forgot to mention that I am using a half empty spool. It seems that with empty spools it fails at 6,5mm3/s and with a new filament spool sometimes fails at 9,5mm3/s and sometimes can make the 10mm3/s. After checking the nozzle I want to repeat the same tests with a new filament spool and maybe with a litle higher extrusion rate to understand if there is diferences with the board ventilation and this way we can exclude bended filament from the equation.
Edited: These tests means nothing, I may have permanent damage resistors. It seems to me that the temperature near the extruder stepper is too hot. I can´t complain a lot because I can achieve the 10 mm3/s (after a few changes) and maybe with less bended filament and with board ventilation its possible to reach the 12mm3/s. My real problem here it's just filament bended due to radius of an empty spool. The spool should be changed for a bigger radius to avoid so much bended filament.
It should be great if others users could do the same tests because is not enough data to take any conclusions. I think that Nico's printer board after being inspected by Ultimaker team, can give some anwsers. (or the stepper motor)
-
Ok I am back.
Like always portuguese police are a piece of.... dont care about it...
So... I will start the test with the ventilation now...
Hey, I am glad Ultimaker and my bad smoker habits prevented a robbery.
-
Hi Nico,
Steal and break in...
Have to go to the door... i think its the police.
-
I am sory for the delay, but my print tests were interrupted by a thief in my garden. Not a joke!
I was drinking a beer and smoke a cigarette on my garden when I saw one guy and one girl inside my garden. Still a bit nervous and adrenaline is kicking right here but i will finish the tests today.
-
If you or Markus are ever in Virginia, I'm going to treat you like kings; thanks again for your efforts.
You already treat us like kings. You don't have to thank, the pleasure is all mine.
I will take pictures of the sensor position
-
So now I am taking a pause for the comfort beer and then I will make the same test but without the board cover and with ventilation...
-
Hi Aaron,
I have VERY interesting data. You will be very happy with the first results...
First extrusion test at 230ºC and 22,0ºC room temperature without ventilation and with the board cover on
Board temps (measured as close to behind the chip and resistors as possible)
Start (idle) 22,0ºC
In the end of heating up process: 37,7ºC
1º Layer 3mm3/s: 47,0ºC
1ª layer 4mm3/s: 74,1ºC
1º layer 5mm3/s: 81,0ºC
1º layer 6mm3/s: 84,7ºC
Failed at 6,5mm3/s: 85,1ºC
There was a very tiny under extrusion at 83.5ºC. The most interesting is that under extrusion occur right after 85ºC (the Absolute Maximum Rate for the chip)
-
In my opinion should be more interesting to mesure the chip temperature rather than board temps.
Edited: I meant closer to the chip
-
Hi Guys,
Should I measure the board temp in the same area as Markus (mnis) or should I measure right behind the R96 and R97?
I think that should be the same temp...
I am waiting to achieve and stabilize the 22ºC room temperature since all my extrusion tests were made at this setpoint.
-
Is there anyway someone could confirm that the 4983 stepper chips are being used in the device?
Hi Aaron,
Stepper chip is 4988ET
I am installing right now the fan to an external power supply and then I will connect the temp sensors and make the tests.
-
Hi illuminarti,
Lately I felt the lack of your posts, so I will here help you to regain the throne. or not, already given 2 or 3 likes to Ian on this thread :mrgreen:
I am glad you are back
-
Hi Guys,
I also use cyanoacrylate glue and it works extremely well, it glues the PLA and sometimes the fingers too.
If you don't apply too much glue, it dries only in 5 seconds (can be a disadvantage for some collages), but for me this is a plus.
-
the other thing is that the filament is not under extruding , quite the opposite and over extruding.
I am sorry, my mistake. I will delete my previous posts since they aren´t over extruding related
-
I don't know how applicable this hypothesis is, but I'll definitely
That's why I want to make the cylinder tests, in order to help validate your theory. I will certainly post my results
Shoot it's 5 Am here, I need to wake up
-
Oh man, I am so happy...
Hey Boys very nice job you nailed it. Now everything makes sense and explains a LOT. Actually it explains everything, every behavior that I observed on my printer and in some other printers is in total agreement with your findings.
I think we have a winner here!! Congratulations!! maybe you didn't notice yet, but I am really excited with it.
Tomorrow I will try to print some extrusion tests with a fan under the resistors
-
Hi Guys, Freaks and Everyone :smile:
Hi Everyone, I started to read this thread as normal Guy and now I am Freaking out here!
I try to explain everything in much more detail in the coming days ... at the weekend.
What? Please throw me with the old stepper motor in to my head, should be less painful than this...
Can your UM2 printer achieve 10mm3/s ??? Test it here...
in UltiMaker 3D printers
Posted
Hi Shurik,
Congratulations, your printer rules! The extrusion test is with 0.25 layers.
For 0.1mm layers:
3mm³/s = 75mm/s
4mm³/s = 100mm/s
5mm³ = 125mm/s
6mm³ = 150mm/s
7mm³ = 175mm/s
8mm³ = 200mm/s
9mm³ = 225mm/s
10mm³ = 250mm/s
Thank you so much for the post. I was convinced that your printer would be in the problem list, I am glad that is not