Jump to content

cleven

Member
  • Posts

    137
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by cleven

  1. I thought about it, but each printer is different and two points at least would need to be determined.

    Example: do the flow test at 185, 210, and 230. Then generate a linear equation. Then you could set the temperature which would set your max flow.

    Now each user would have to do this and input their data to generate the equation. So to avoid this I just added a SF to the equation if needed, and or they know the max value they can achieve at said temperature and simply change the value manually :)

     

    Nice job Cleven. I am thinking that if you could relate the flow to extruder temp. required you could display the proposed extruder temp. for the job :)

     

  2. I was speaking to someone about this, it may have been in the other posting or not, but we discussed having the material aluminium/metal. We discussed the heat transfer differences. This heat transfer rate would cause the nozzle volume to increase as you increase the heat higher into the filament. Also ptfe has a very low friction coef, and is somewhat flexible and can force material through if an issue arrises.

    I think any material which resists heat and heat transfer would be great :D

     

  3. After doing the 10mm3 flow test, I have been verifying the flow relative to speed on some of my prints. To ensure that I am not pushing the limits of my machine. This allows me to effectively print somethings quick as possible if need be.

    Set the nozzle Size, then Set the limit acquired by your machine in the right corner in the max flow box. It will state the speed limits. I have set a safety factor option. A number of 1.3 works rather or just leave as 1.0. From here you can set the speeds and layer height you would like to see the total flow.

    Click here for the calc sheet.

    volume.jpg

    Note I made this nicer and simplified my other sheet I used. Hopefully there isn't a mistake. This is for reference only.

     

  4. Focal Point, very cool idea, with the focal point you may need to play with the mounting. :) maybe make the cone clip on as to have the ability to clip on larger "ears" for ability to capture audio at a much larger directional distance. This would be good for wildlife or spying purposes :D

    reflectioncurved.jpg

     

  5. It may make a difference but overall I've had high quality prints with my machine. I will let you know what difference if any I notice :)

    A bit upsetting with the machine being wired wrong. But it is hard to notice that the fan wasn't running. I was always focused on the other two fans and setting up the print. I started to take notice when I was experimenting with the ptfe part. Started wondering why that fan wasn't coming on. I took it off brought it down to the static circuit lab lol and tested it. Then I gave it a total solder upgrade :)

     

    That's funny, Cleven! Good thing you found it. Wonder if you will get better prints now?

    My fan came in today. It didn't have a connector, just bare wires, so I'll have to wait and solder it in when I get home.

     

  6. The modifications tested were on ID, OD, length, chamfers, rounds etc. Slightly modifying each individually to reduce friction and wear within the PTFE part. I have also tested other materials such as higher ptfe, peek and torlon. I have tested each of the verifications with the 10mm3/s flowrate and found that the last posting of sizes worked best to achieve this higher flow rate.

    @Cleven, I'm not quite following this thread. Can you please expand on what important changes you have made to the spacer, what problem you think this addresses, and why?

×
×
  • Create New...