Jump to content

Gnevko

Member
  • Posts

    56
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Gnevko

  1. Also one very interesting photo (from my point of view of course)

    IMG_1287.thumb.jpg.e785280f7364a0c5dab87b0698c10ebd.jpg

    As you can see - legs are not really gut .... actually they are terrible (holes, gaps and so on), but "body" itself - has very nice quality. The difference is - "body" has one very long perimeter, legs - short perimeters with a lot of retraction. I think that the  S3D configuration for my UMO+ is a bit wrong

    5a33219d6041e_2016-09-2223_04_04.thumb.png.e381d0fe90c79b9ffccaefb5a7d1da2d.png

    otherwise my towers was printed without retraction but they have also small perimeters (compare to the "body" part on the last photo) ... hm.

    IMG_1287.thumb.jpg.e785280f7364a0c5dab87b0698c10ebd.jpg

    5a33219d6041e_2016-09-2223_04_04.thumb.png.e381d0fe90c79b9ffccaefb5a7d1da2d.png

  2. Hi, people!

    I have UMO+ (about one month) and if I move my print bed down (just by hand) I hear some strange sound from the linear bearings ... It sounds like "clicks" and "crackle". Is it normal or linear bearing are damaged?

    The second question is also about linear bearings but for the XY head moving (in printer head). It seems they have some small play if I try a little bit to sway the nozzle. Is it ok or maybe I need to buy more quality linear bearings?

    Thank you in andvance!

    Regards,

    Alex

  3. Just one idea. If I need to print something like a cylinder

    5a332167052cb_2016-09-179_58_26.thumb.png.b833f0acf3f3a1fe6f4b6eacdf1b0f49.png

    Cura 2.3.0 do following

    1) at first will be print inner perimeter (or outer perimeter depend on configuration)

    2) then nozzle will be moved to print out perimeter

    3) then outer perimeter is finished a bed go a bit down and the nozzle will be moved to print inner perimeter again.

    The problem is: the moving of the bed and the moving of the nozzle at the same time cause a lot of additional vibrations. The better way in this case - don't change from outer to inner perimeter, just move the bed down and continue the printing of the outer perimeter. With other words it will be very helpful to have a configuration possibility to alternate inner and outer perimeters for each new layer.

    Thank you for attention!

    5a332167052cb_2016-09-179_58_26.thumb.png.b833f0acf3f3a1fe6f4b6eacdf1b0f49.png

  4. Hi, maybe I do something wrong, but it seams that "Infill Before Walls" option hat no impact! With or without this option the infill will be print at first, than inner perimeter and at end out perimeter.

    5a332126bb998_2016-09-0917_50_52.thumb.png.58032046ab028c9cd0e629ec8171884c.png

    Other problem is, why I actually try to user the option at all: when inner perimeter will be printed, the part of a hot end moves over an infill what makes terrible vibrations.

    5a332126bb998_2016-09-0917_50_52.thumb.png.58032046ab028c9cd0e629ec8171884c.png

  5. It tries to load a profile that it can't find. By the look of it you also had 2.1 installed. We've found some issues with the 2.1 conversion scripts, so clearing your local files will already help quite a bit.

     

    I deleted all related folder which a could find and reinstall Cura 2.30 ... the problem is still exists (as soon I add and select new profile and close Cura) :(

  6. Yes, at first I installed Cura 2.1.3, then I deinstall it and installed Cura 2.3 ... and as a typical user I assume it should just work without something need to be clearing or some other magic staff.

  7. Hi,

    how can I send you the log file (I found it :))?

    And now I can reproduce this bag: just create or update a profile, close Cura Application, open Cura again - that's it - "Add new printer" window.

    2016-09-05 20:47:19,182 - WARNING - UM/Settings/ContainerRegistry.pyc (load [188]): Could not determine container type for file /Users/Alex/.cura/machine_instances/Ultimaker+Original.cfg, ignoring

    2016-09-05 20:47:19,183 - WARNING - UM/Settings/ContainerRegistry.pyc (load [188]): Could not determine container type for file /Users/Alex/.cura/machine_instances/Ultimaker+Original%2B+%232.cfg, ignoring

    2016-09-05 20:47:19,578 - DEBUG - .../cura/plugins/MachineSettingsAction/MachineSettingsAction.py (_onContainerAdded [40]): Not attaching MachineSettingsAction to ultimaker_original_dual; Multi-extrusion printers are not supported

    2016-09-05 20:47:19,974 - DEBUG - .../cura/plugins/MachineSettingsAction/MachineSettingsAction.py (_onContainerAdded [40]): Not attaching MachineSettingsAction to ultimaker2_extended_plus; Machines that use variants are not supported

    2016-09-05 20:47:20,107 - DEBUG - .../cura/plugins/MachineSettingsAction/MachineSettingsAction.py (_onContainerAdded [40]): Not attaching MachineSettingsAction to ultimaker2_plus; Machines that use variants are not supported

    2016-09-05 20:47:25,465 - ERROR - UM/Logger.pyc (logException [53]): Exception: Could not deserialize container Ultimaker Original+

    2016-09-05 20:47:25,465 - ERROR - UM/Logger.pyc (logException [53]): Traceback (most recent call last):

    2016-09-05 20:47:25,465 - ERROR - UM/Logger.pyc (logException [53]): File "UM/Settings/ContainerRegistry.pyc", line 238, in load

    2016-09-05 20:47:25,465 - ERROR - UM/Logger.pyc (logException [53]): File "UM/Settings/ContainerStack.pyc", line 252, in deserialize

    2016-09-05 20:47:25,466 - ERROR - UM/Logger.pyc (logException [53]): Exception: When trying to deserialize, we received an unknown ID (ultimaker original+_normal quality 0) for container

  8. DaHai8, thank you for the explanation!

    Other strange Cura's 2.3 behavior on MAC OS X: sometimes Cura starts with "New Machine Assistant" and without my already added Printer. It really a little bit confusing because I need to change the Start/End GCode part each time it happens.

    Maybe you know how to solve this problem?

  9. Hi!

    I have some strange behavior on the GUI. I have changed "Infill Overlap Percentage" from the default value (10%) to 15% and saved in my profile. After some experiments I changed the value back to 10%. Now habe have to messages:

    5a3320f48005c_2016-09-0418_32_35.thumb.png.5fa304fcaeece58d42e3381b98ffda47.png

    if I press "i", the field value is still 10%, but now I have an other message

    5a3320f4ae7dc_2016-09-0418_32_49.thumb.png.b5de8672d382ba05df77448703702193.png

    was actually is wrong, because these is no different to my profile value or to the default value.

    5a3320f48005c_2016-09-0418_32_35.thumb.png.5fa304fcaeece58d42e3381b98ffda47.png

    5a3320f4ae7dc_2016-09-0418_32_49.thumb.png.b5de8672d382ba05df77448703702193.png

×
×
  • Create New...