Jump to content

Memory: Something went wrong during slicing


Recommended Posts

Posted · Memory: Something went wrong during slicing

Everytime i try to slice a bigger model with cura I get this error.

Here's the log:

File C:\Users\Chuleo\Desktop\cellularThing_optimizedForMakerbot.stl is being chain exported.

Carve procedure took 1 minute 29 seconds.

Preface procedure took 1 minute 4 seconds.

Inset procedure took 6 minutes 7 seconds.

Fill procedure took 15 minutes 6 seconds.

Traceback (most recent call last):

File "app_main.py", line 51, in run_toplevel

File "C:\Program Files (x86)\Cura_12.08\Cura\cura.py", line 80, in


File "C:\Program Files (x86)\Cura_12.08\Cura\cura.py", line 72, in main


File "C:\Program Files (x86)\Cura_12.08\Cura\util\sliceRun.py", line 81, in runSlice


File "C:\Program Files (x86)\Cura_12.08\Cura\cura_sf\skeinforge_application\skeinforge_utilities\skeinforge_craft.py", line 135, in writeOutput

return pluginModule.writeOutput(fileName, shouldAnalyze)

File "C:\Program Files (x86)\Cura_12.08\Cura\cura_sf\skeinforge_application\skeinforge_plugins\craft_plugins\export.py", line 275, in writeOutput

gcodeText = skeinforge_craft.getChainTextFromProcedures(fileName, procedures[: -1], gcodeText)

File "C:\Program Files (x86)\Cura_12.08\Cura\cura_sf\skeinforge_application\skeinforge_utilities\skeinforge_craft.py", line 44, in getChainTextFromProcedures

text = craftModule.getCraftedText(fileName, text)

File "C:\Program Files (x86)\Cura_12.08\Cura\cura_sf\skeinforge_application\skeinforge_plugins\craft_plugins\speed.py", line 143, in getCraftedText

return getCraftedTextFromText(archive.getTextIfEmpty(fileName, text), repository)

File "C:\Program Files (x86)\Cura_12.08\Cura\cura_sf\skeinforge_application\skeinforge_plugins\craft_plugins\speed.py", line 153, in getCraftedTextFromText

return SpeedSkein().getCraftedGcode(gcodeText, repository)

File "C:\Program Files (x86)\Cura_12.08\Cura\cura_sf\skeinforge_application\skeinforge_plugins\craft_plugins\speed.py", line 272, in getCraftedGcode


File "C:\Program Files (x86)\Cura_12.08\Cura\cura_sf\skeinforge_application\skeinforge_plugins\craft_plugins\speed.py", line 349, in parseLine


File "C:\Program Files (x86)\Cura_12.08\Cura\cura_sf\fabmetheus_utilities\gcodec.py", line 330, in addLine

self.output.write(line + '\n')


How can I fix that? As a test I sliced the same model with 1mm layer height, which worked just fine.

It can't be because of the amount of RAM (10 of 16GB Free in normal operation.) Nor can't it be because of lack of disk space.

I run Windows 7 x64 (The same thing happens with my desktop computer and my Notebook)

Best Regards


  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Memory: Something went wrong during slicing

    The 32 bit pypy implementation can only use 2GB of memory under windows. So even if you have 10GB of free ram, it will still bug out after using 2GB. Which is a bit of a shame, as the slicing process is currently quite memory hungry.

    I've never had a model so complex that it would bug out like this, but other people have had the same problem.

    However, a memory error could also indicate a problem with your RAM. I highly recommend running memtest:


    to be sure that is not it.

    (This problem is limited to Windows, Mac is always 64 bit, and for linux there is a 64bit pypy to use)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Memory: Something went wrong during slicing

    At 0.2mm layers the cellularThing_optimizedForMakerbot.stl seems to slice, but it is using a huge amount of memory, like 800MB. With thinner layers that would get even worse. Slic3r or Kisslicer might do a better job at these models.

    It's a known problem, and solving it would mean moving to another slicer (Cura is Skeinforge based), but that's no an easy change to make.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Memory: Something went wrong during slicing

    Yeah but I don't want to use a different slicer, since cura gave me excellent results - way better than netfabb.

    Instead I try to run linux in a virtual box and slice it there with cura. Hope that works...

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Memory: Something went wrong during slicing

    Quick update: I installed Ubuntu in a virtual box and installed Cura there (which wasn't that easy but finally I managed to do it). Everything works just fine now.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.3 stable released
        In this stable release, Cura 5.3 achieves yet another huge leap forward in 3D printing thanks to material interlocking! As well as introducing an expanded recommended print settings menu and lots of print quality improvements. Not to mention, a whole bunch of new printer profiles for non-UltiMaker printers!
          • Thanks
          • Like
        • 56 replies
      • Here it is. The new UltiMaker S7
        The UltiMaker S7 is built on the success of the UltiMaker S5 and its design decisions were heavily based on feedback from customers.
        So what’s new?
        The obvious change is the S7’s height. It now includes an integrated Air Manager. This filters the exhaust air of every print and also improves build temperature stability. To further enclose the build chamber the S7 only has one magnetically latched door.
        The build stack has also been completely redesigned. A PEI-coated flexible steel build plate makes a big difference to productivity. Not only do you not need tools to pop a printed part off. But we also don’t recommend using or adhesion structures for UltiMaker materials (except PC, because...it’s PC). Along with that, 4 pins and 25 magnets make it easy to replace the flex plate perfectly – even with one hand.
        The re-engineered print head has an inductive sensor which reduces noise when probing the build plate. This effectively makes it much harder to not achieve a perfect first layer, improving overall print success. We also reversed the front fan direction (fewer plastic hairs, less maintenance), made the print core door magnets stronger, and add a sensor that helps avoid flooding.

        The UltiMaker S7 also includes quality of life improvements:
        Reliable bed tilt compensation (no more thumbscrews) 2.4 and 5 GHz Wi-Fi A 1080p camera (mounted higher for a better view) Compatibility with 280+ Marketplace materials Compatibility with S5 project files (no reslicing needed) And a whole lot more  
        Curious to see the S7 in action?
        We’re hosting a free tech demo on February 7.
        It will be live and you can ask any questions to our CTO, Miguel Calvo.
        Register here for the Webinar
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • UltiMaker Cura Alpha 🎄 Tree Support Spotlight 🎄
        Are you a fan of tree support, but dislike the removal process and the amount of filament it uses? Then we would like to invite you to try this special release of UltiMaker Cura. Brought to you by our special community contributor @thomasrahm
        We generated a special version of Cura 5.2 called 5.3.0 Alpha + Xmas. The only changes we introduced compared to UltiMaker Cura 5.2.1 are those which are needed for the new supports. So keep in mind, this is not a sneak peek for Cura 5.3 (there are some really cool new features coming up) but a spotlight release highlighting this new version of tree supports.  
          • Like
        • 29 replies
    • Create New...