Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
Sign in to follow this  

SkeinPyPy Time for a name change?

Recommended Posts

My SkeinPyPy project grew into something larger then I imagined when I started it. It just started out as a speedup of Skeinforge with PyPy. But now, it's a whole new GUI, a bunch of tweaks, firmware updater, first run wizard.

It has grown beyond it's Skeinforge roots. And the goal has shifted from "Making Skeinforge faster and a bit more userfriendly" to "Making the whole 3D printing experience more user friendly". It's not done, but it's improving almost every day, the "printer interface" GUI starts to take shape in my head. So that might be added soon.

If you compare the development version to the Beta4 you already will notice a bunch of changes. Including the ability to switch between GCode and Model view. And easier to use "model" tools, no longer hidden in a tab (which always was a temp solution), or how about the "model errors shown after slicing" feature?

With the advert of new features, and some ideas I still have planned but not implemented or even announced. I was thinking. SkeinPyPy is a bad name. If I add "Slic3r" support it still has the smell of Skeinforge behind it. Which is bad, as Skeinforge is associated with "slow, hard to use, zero feedback", which is everything SkeinPyPy is not. (well, except for the "Slow" part, but still faster then Skeinforge)

So, I'm looking for a new and better name for SkeinPyPy. And I'm terrible at names. I don't want anything "Ulti-*". I'm looking for something flashy, something unique, and something which can be pronounced without hurting your tongue.

(I know renaming a project is not always the best action, but that's why I rather do it now, the earlier the better)

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
should i be reading and posting on the google group and not here ?

is the google group better than this forum ?


It's different. So far the forum is a lot of support questions, people seeking help. And the groups are more discussions about improvements. The groups seem a bit more active. But I find the forums easier to search in case you are looking for something.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • Introducing Ultimaker Cura 3.6 | Beta
      Ultimaker Cura 3.6 | Beta is available. It comes with new features, bug fixes, and UX improvements. We would really like to have your feedback on it to make our stable release as good as it can be. As always, you can download the beta for free from our website, for Windows, MacOS, and Linux.
        • Like
      • 95 replies
    • Print Core CC | Red for Ruby
      Q: For some users, abrasive materials may be a new subject matter. Can you explain what it is that makes a material abrasive when you are not sure which print core to use?
      A: Materials which are hard in a solid piece (like metals, ceramics and carbon fibers) will generally also wear down the nozzle. In general one should assume...
        • Like
      • 30 replies
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!