Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
Sign in to follow this  
phanc60844

Z section guides

Recommended Posts

Looks like I've hit this common problem of the Z guides being about 3-4 mm too narrow for the guide rods. I forced them in but the tabs on the left side of the table popped out. I just about got them back in but the plates either side of the z nut are loose. I noticed that this is a common issue so why hasn't the hole spacing being altered on the top and bottom frame sections by the Ultimaker team? :x

Any ideas on how to firm up the framework around the Z nut guys?

Paul

UK England

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes the shaft centres are 3mm misaligned.

I dont know exactly why this was done, but my best guess is that they like the z carridge to stretch horizontally

to give it some preload on the bearings to be stable. You can see this because the left side of the Z carridge is flexible and has been designed to flex outwards to be able to fit to the shafts (which are 3mm wider than the bearings in the Z carridge).

The area around the nut has been made intentionally so that the bronze "nut" can move about, if you dont do that, what happens is that the lead screw will wobble the whole z axis carridge about, because its pretty wonky by the time its been coupled to the Z motor. So dont fix the bronze "Z nut" because it will just make your table wobble as it goes up and down.

It doesnt really matter that its loose in there, because gravity is keeping the table down anyway, and the table only goes down during printing. If it were having to do direction reverals, that would be a big problem. But it doesnt..so.

I do admit though, that im my opinion the z carridge design can be improved alot. Its not very solid generally

and could do with beefing up. This is one major reason behind layer misalignment on tall prints. I have seen some

people bolting on stuff to the flexible LHS of the carridge to stiffen it up.

Its not great, but there are a half dozen things to improve before you need to start worring about the z carridge.

C.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The Z screw is indeed misaligned a bit. We discovered this a few weeks ago, but on normal sized printers it doesn't cause any real problems. I think it's the result from the drawings being done in Illustrator instead of a CAD tool.

As snowygrouch already pointed out, it's very important that the bronze "nut" is lose. The leadscrew we use is never properly centered (it's almost impossible to create them perfectly centered) if you fix this firmly in the platform you will get ridges that exactly match the thread pitch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • Taking Advantage of DfAM
      This is a statement that’s often made about AM/3DP. I'll focus on the way DfAM can take advantage of some of the unique capabilities that AM and 3DP have to offer. I personally think that the use of AM/3DP for light-weighting is one of it’s most exciting possibilities and one that could play a key part in the sustainability of design and manufacturing in the future.
        • Like
      • 3 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!