Jump to content

Weird Z height issue with UMO Marlin


antiklesys

Recommended Posts

Posted · Weird Z height issue with UMO Marlin

have this function to home the printer and set the bed at a specific height for laser cutting.

This is in ultralcd.cpp

 

static void laser_home(){   enquecommand_P(PSTR("G28 X0 Y0"));   enquecommand_P(PSTR("G28 Z0"));   enquecommand_P(PSTR("G1 Z85 F12000"));}

 

So far all works well, but I wanted to change it, so I could set the Z height manually from the screen and adjust it to different values.

I changed this function in:

 

static void laser_home(){   enquecommand_P(PSTR("G28 X0 Y0"));   enquecommand_P(PSTR("G28 Z0"));  char buffer[32];  float laser_offset = 80;  sprintf_P(buffer,PSTR("G1 Z%i F12000"), laser_offset);  enquecommand(buffer);}

 

As you can see, laser offset is a float that for testing has been set to a fixed value of 80.

Additional note: my printer homes at the bottom.

Now what is weird to me, is that when I run the first code (the old one at the top), the printer homes and then puts the bed at Z85. This is good.

When I run the second function instead (the newer one), the printer homes and then surpasses Z85 and crushes the bed in the head (attempts to do it, as I switch it off before this happens).

Any clue on what I'm doing wrong here?

All help is welcome

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Weird Z height issue with UMO Marlin

    The next question would be related to a similar behavior happening with

    zprobe_zoffset item in Marlin

    In ultralcd.cpp I have:

     

    #ifdef ENABLE_AUTO_BED_LEVELING   MENU_ITEM_EDIT(float32, MSG_ZPROBE_ZOFFSET, &zprobe_zoffset, 0.5, 50);#endif

     

    Now it seems this distance is negative as per Marlin_main.cpp

     

         #ifdef ENABLE_AUTO_BED_LEVELING       if((home_all_axis) || (code_seen(axis_codes[Z_AXIS]))) {         current_position[Z_AXIS] += zprobe_zoffset;  //Add Z_Probe offset (the distance is negative)       }     #endif

     

    This means that whatever I set in this variable will cause the head to go below Z 0 is this correct?

    Meaning if I home at Z0 and i have an offset of 3, the head will go at Z-3 and consider that Z0?

    If so I would need a way to use a signed Z offset rather than a negative one, this would allow me to choose wether to have a positive or negative distance based on the situation / head mounted.

    Any help to point me in the right direction to fix this too? :)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · Weird Z height issue with UMO Marlin

    The offset is not per say negative, it is the fact that you add it to the current position that places your zero more towards the negative direction.

    This offset is a float, so it signed by definition and can have any value you like...

    Edited by Guest
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Weird Z height issue with UMO Marlin

    So it should allow me to go in the other direction by changing this?

     

    static void lcd_control_motion_menu(){   START_MENU();   MENU_ITEM(back, MSG_CONTROL, lcd_control_menu);#ifdef ENABLE_AUTO_BED_LEVELING   MENU_ITEM_EDIT(float32, MSG_ZPROBE_ZOFFSET, &zprobe_zoffset, 0.5, 50);#endif

     

    into this?

     

    static void lcd_control_motion_menu(){   START_MENU();   MENU_ITEM(back, MSG_CONTROL, lcd_control_menu);#ifdef ENABLE_AUTO_BED_LEVELING   MENU_ITEM_EDIT(float32, MSG_ZPROBE_ZOFFSET, &zprobe_zoffset, -10, 50);#endif

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Weird Z height issue with UMO Marlin

    Yes it should...

    (To be tested, but I see no reason why it wouldn't work)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Weird Z height issue with UMO Marlin

    Tested by changing the line into:

     

    #ifdef ENABLE_AUTO_BED_LEVELING   MENU_ITEM_EDIT(float32, MSG_ZPROBE_ZOFFSET, &zprobe_zoffset, -10, 10);#endif

     

    The first issue I encounter is graphical.

    While the value stays within positive numbers, the display shows it correctly during the adjustment (for instance it shows : "Z Offset: 000.02")

    As soon as I go below 0 with the encoder, it shows on the display "Z Offset: --*.,("

    Thus not allowing me to correctly set a negative value.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Weird Z height issue with UMO Marlin

    Found the cause of the issue.

    This is generated from a bug in marlin, fixed the code and now works fine :)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.8 beta released
        Another Cura release has arrived and in this 5.8 beta release, the focus is on improving Z seams, as well as completing support for the full Method series of printers by introducing a profile for the UltiMaker Method.
          • Like
        • 1 reply
      • Introducing the UltiMaker Factor 4
        We are happy to announce the next evolution in the UltiMaker 3D printer lineup: the UltiMaker Factor 4 industrial-grade 3D printer, designed to take manufacturing to new levels of efficiency and reliability. Factor 4 is an end-to-end 3D printing solution for light industrial applications
          • Thanks
          • Like
        • 3 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...