Jump to content
UltiMaker Community of 3D Printing Experts

CURA 2.4 Infill


Recommended Posts

Posted · CURA 2.4 Infill

I just noticed the difference between infill settings of the Ultimaker3 and Ultimaker2.

At 20% infill you get a 3.5mm line distance on the UM2, but a 5mm line distance on the UM3.

At 100% infill you get a 0.35 mm line distance on the UM2, but a 1 mm line distance on the UM3.

So it looks like on the UM3 you don't get the amount of infill you asked for :) I guess roughly calculating that a 5mm line width is less than 20% .... so it looks like the UM3 settings are wrong.

All with 0.4 nozzle, 0.2 layer, 0.35 line width

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · CURA 2.4 Infill

    There is more to the line distance: It gets multiplied if there are more directions of lines on one layer. For instance, triangle infill has 3 directions of lines (making it triangles). This makes the infill thrice as much in theory (practice is a little different). Because it extrudes three times as much, the distance between the lines must be greater to achieve the same infill percentage. Grid has only 2 directions for the lines. This also illustrates the difference between the UM2 and the UM3 since they have different defaults for the infill pattern.

    For the more technically inclined, the precise formula that's being used to compute the line distance is this:


    0 if infill_sparse_density == 0 else (infill_line_width * 100) / infill_sparse_density * (2 if infill_pattern == 'grid' else (3 if infill_pattern == 'triangles' or infill_pattern == 'cubic' or infill_pattern == 'cubicsubdiv' else (4 if infill_pattern == 'tetrahedral' else 1)))


    The only place where the infill density is significantly incorrect is cubic subdivision, because which cubes are subdivided is only known after slicing. There isn't a real good solution to that at the moment but that is technically a bug.

    In practice there are of course other differences, because the material gets blocked by other materials when it moves over a previously placed infill line in a different direction. Also above 100% infill it starts to waver, of course, because the material gets blocked.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · CURA 2.4 Infill

    This also illustrates the difference between the UM2 and the UM3 since they have different defaults for the infill pattern.


    I understand what you're saying, but I do think there is an error in the UM3 settings, my comparison was in both cases with "GRID". The UM3 gets significantly less infill with the same settings, and 100% fill is not solid but 1 mm line width...

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.3 stable released
        In this stable release, Cura 5.3 achieves yet another huge leap forward in 3D printing thanks to material interlocking! As well as introducing an expanded recommended print settings menu and lots of print quality improvements. Not to mention, a whole bunch of new printer profiles for non-UltiMaker printers!
          • Thanks
          • Like
        • 24 replies
      • Here it is. The new UltiMaker S7
        The UltiMaker S7 is built on the success of the UltiMaker S5 and its design decisions were heavily based on feedback from customers.
        So what’s new?
        The obvious change is the S7’s height. It now includes an integrated Air Manager. This filters the exhaust air of every print and also improves build temperature stability. To further enclose the build chamber the S7 only has one magnetically latched door.
        The build stack has also been completely redesigned. A PEI-coated flexible steel build plate makes a big difference to productivity. Not only do you not need tools to pop a printed part off. But we also don’t recommend using or adhesion structures for UltiMaker materials (except PC, because...it’s PC). Along with that, 4 pins and 25 magnets make it easy to replace the flex plate perfectly – even with one hand.
        The re-engineered print head has an inductive sensor which reduces noise when probing the build plate. This effectively makes it much harder to not achieve a perfect first layer, improving overall print success. We also reversed the front fan direction (fewer plastic hairs, less maintenance), made the print core door magnets stronger, and add a sensor that helps avoid flooding.

        The UltiMaker S7 also includes quality of life improvements:
        Reliable bed tilt compensation (no more thumbscrews) 2.4 and 5 GHz Wi-Fi A 1080p camera (mounted higher for a better view) Compatibility with 280+ Marketplace materials Compatibility with S5 project files (no reslicing needed) And a whole lot more  
        Curious to see the S7 in action?
        We’re hosting a free tech demo on February 7.
        It will be live and you can ask any questions to our CTO, Miguel Calvo.
        Register here for the Webinar
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • UltiMaker Cura Alpha 🎄 Tree Support Spotlight 🎄
        Are you a fan of tree support, but dislike the removal process and the amount of filament it uses? Then we would like to invite you to try this special release of UltiMaker Cura. Brought to you by our special community contributor @thomasrahm
        We generated a special version of Cura 5.2 called 5.3.0 Alpha + Xmas. The only changes we introduced compared to UltiMaker Cura 5.2.1 are those which are needed for the new supports. So keep in mind, this is not a sneak peek for Cura 5.3 (there are some really cool new features coming up) but a spotlight release highlighting this new version of tree supports.  
          • Like
        • 22 replies
    • Create New...