UltiMaker uses functional, analytical and tracking cookies. Tracking cookies enhance your experience on our website and may also collect your personal data outside of Ultimaker websites. If you agree with the use of tracking cookies, click “I agree, continue browsing”. You can withdraw your consent at any time. If you do not consent with the use of tracking cookies, click “Refuse”. You can find more information about cookies on our Privacy and Cookie Policy page.
Reduced mass "direct drive' extruder with frame mounted motor
Posted
(edited)
· Reduced mass "direct drive' extruder with frame mounted motor
Ideas are flowing in.
A superior option to the bevel or worm gear might be to use the same timing belts we already use, but with a twist ( i mean that literally, not figuratively). This would virtually eliminate backlash from the system and would be much less expensive to produce without custom gears. Does anyone have any experience with running G2 timing belt (or comparable) with a twist? Perhaps it would wear the belts and cause premature failure?
Also, instead of a single X and Y cross shaft, multiple shafts could be used. The torque they transmit could be used for anything from extruding multiple filaments, to swapping remotely stored filament/hotend combos.
Edit:
Another idea,
instead of using expensive ball splines, perhaps precision ground square stock could be used. The linear motion would be transmitted through small cartridge bearings rolling axially, along the shaft axis. Since the shaft is square, torque would be transmitted tangentially through the bearings into whatever housing they are mounted on.
In the Cura 5.8 stable release, everyone can now tune their Z seams to look better than ever. Method series users get access to new material profiles, and the base Method model now has a printer profile, meaning the whole Method series is now supported in Cura!
We are happy to announce the next evolution in the UltiMaker 3D printer lineup: the UltiMaker Factor 4 industrial-grade 3D printer, designed to take manufacturing to new levels of efficiency and reliability. Factor 4 is an end-to-end 3D printing solution for light industrial applications
Recommended Posts
infiniteinquiry 0
Ideas are flowing in.
A superior option to the bevel or worm gear might be to use the same timing belts we already use, but with a twist ( i mean that literally, not figuratively). This would virtually eliminate backlash from the system and would be much less expensive to produce without custom gears. Does anyone have any experience with running G2 timing belt (or comparable) with a twist? Perhaps it would wear the belts and cause premature failure?
Also, instead of a single X and Y cross shaft, multiple shafts could be used. The torque they transmit could be used for anything from extruding multiple filaments, to swapping remotely stored filament/hotend combos.
Edit:
Another idea,
instead of using expensive ball splines, perhaps precision ground square stock could be used. The linear motion would be transmitted through small cartridge bearings rolling axially, along the shaft axis. Since the shaft is square, torque would be transmitted tangentially through the bearings into whatever housing they are mounted on.
Edited by GuestLink to post
Share on other sites