UltiMaker uses functional, analytical and tracking cookies. Tracking cookies enhance your experience on our website and may also collect your personal data outside of Ultimaker websites. If you agree with the use of tracking cookies, click “I agree, continue browsing”. You can withdraw your consent at any time. If you do not consent with the use of tracking cookies, click “Refuse”. You can find more information about cookies on our Privacy and Cookie Policy page.
Pause at height not working correctly if more than one pause needed U4.9
Posted
· Pause at height not working correctly if more than one pause needed U4.9
It certainly is a mess.
I knew that Pause at Height using "At Height" is sketchy if there are Z-Hops in the file (a well documented bug). What happened to you seems to be have been caused by Z-Hops and another peculiar thing.
I think what happened is that the first pause was inserted OK but the second saw the already inserted Z values of the first pause and so it added the second pause right there. The two sets of pause code look jumbled/intertwined/just plain weird. I think the search during the second pause routine saw the line "G1 F300 Z15" within the first pause code and so the second pause routine was inserted there as it was greater than the search number 13.
Pause at Height works fine if you use "By Layer" because the search criteria is very specific. My suggestion would be to pause at Layer:19 and again at Layer:64.
In the Cura 5.8 stable release, everyone can now tune their Z seams to look better than ever. Method series users get access to new material profiles, and the base Method model now has a printer profile, meaning the whole Method series is now supported in Cura!
We are happy to announce the next evolution in the UltiMaker 3D printer lineup: the UltiMaker Factor 4 industrial-grade 3D printer, designed to take manufacturing to new levels of efficiency and reliability. Factor 4 is an end-to-end 3D printing solution for light industrial applications
Recommended Posts
GregValiant 1,342
It certainly is a mess.
I knew that Pause at Height using "At Height" is sketchy if there are Z-Hops in the file (a well documented bug). What happened to you seems to be have been caused by Z-Hops and another peculiar thing.
I think what happened is that the first pause was inserted OK but the second saw the already inserted Z values of the first pause and so it added the second pause right there. The two sets of pause code look jumbled/intertwined/just plain weird. I think the search during the second pause routine saw the line "G1 F300 Z15" within the first pause code and so the second pause routine was inserted there as it was greater than the search number 13.
Pause at Height works fine if you use "By Layer" because the search criteria is very specific. My suggestion would be to pause at Layer:19 and again at Layer:64.
Link to post
Share on other sites