UltiMaker uses functional, analytical and tracking cookies. Tracking cookies enhance your experience on our website and may also collect your personal data outside of Ultimaker websites. If you agree with the use of tracking cookies, click “I agree, continue browsing”. You can withdraw your consent at any time. If you do not consent with the use of tracking cookies, click “Refuse”. You can find more information about cookies on our Privacy and Cookie Policy page.
There's a couple of things going on here. Firstly, UltiGcode E-coordinates are in cubic mm, not linear mm of filament fed in. Secondly, you're running the calculation on the first layer, which is only 0.2mm thick, not 0.25 like the rest of them.
If you adjust for those things, that should get the numbers where they are supposed to be.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Another Cura release has arrived and in this 5.8 beta release, the focus is on improving Z seams, as well as completing support for the full Method series of printers by introducing a profile for the UltiMaker Method.
We are happy to announce the next evolution in the UltiMaker 3D printer lineup: the UltiMaker Factor 4 industrial-grade 3D printer, designed to take manufacturing to new levels of efficiency and reliability. Factor 4 is an end-to-end 3D printing solution for light industrial applications
Recommended Posts
illuminarti 18
There's a couple of things going on here. Firstly, UltiGcode E-coordinates are in cubic mm, not linear mm of filament fed in. Secondly, you're running the calculation on the first layer, which is only 0.2mm thick, not 0.25 like the rest of them.
If you adjust for those things, that should get the numbers where they are supposed to be.
Link to post
Share on other sites