UltiMaker uses functional, analytical and tracking cookies. Tracking cookies enhance your experience on our website and may also collect your personal data outside of Ultimaker websites. If you agree with the use of tracking cookies, click “I agree, continue browsing”. You can withdraw your consent at any time. If you do not consent with the use of tracking cookies, click “Refuse”. You can find more information about cookies on our Privacy and Cookie Policy page.
It sounds like you have a complex model - those will always take time to slice, especially depending on how good your computer is. If you exported straight out of zbrush, your model likely has a very high number of faces which is very computationally intensive to slice.
If you're running Windows, Microsoft's 3D builder app is actually pretty good, and has a function where it can "simplify" the model, reducing how complex model is while affecting its look as little as possible (you can generally achieve a fairly impressive reduction with no loss in quality, especially given the limits of your average 3D printer).
6 hours ago, 1_idk_1 said:
separate them so they do not overlap
Ironically it might actually be a bit quicker if they do overlap, and it would be best if you could do it as a single model. You might have to set the visible settings to "expert" or "all" to see some the settings I mention, but some things I think it's worth keeping in mind:
Mesh Fixes > Union Overlapping Volumes will combine any models that overlap into a single model, which is easier to slice and will likely give you better results than placing multiple models immediately next to each other, but it's still nowhere near as good as just importing a single model.
Layer height and line width affect slicing time - shorter layers and thinner lines take longer to slice.
The following settings might have a serious effect on time (and I'm probably forgetting some):
Walls > Optimize Wall Printing Order
Travel > Combing Mode: it's worth it, but the more strict the rule (I use "not on outer surface"), the longer the slicer takes considering valid paths.
Support > Support Structure: this is another "it's worth it" one in my opinion, but tree support will take longer to calculate than normal support (but it generally requires less support, making it quicker to print and using less filament to print, and easier to remove from the finished model).
Mesh Fixes > Remove All Holes: If your model isn't a completely valid STL file this will help fix some of the potential problems, but obviously you don't want it if your model actually has holes.
Mesh Fixes > Extensive Stitching: Same sort of idea as above, but this will only affect your model visually if the model is very poorly defined in its STL file.
Experimental > Infill Travel Optimization: Makes the slicer take longer to calculate the best (generally shortest) travels while printing infill. In a complex model it can make a significant difference in slicing time.
You only need your model at high enough quality to print - even with a 0.2mm nozzle (most printers come with a 0.4mm nozzle), you're probably limited to about 0.06mm layers and 0.12mm line width (at best, some printers can't do layer steps that short). Those might seem like tiny numbers, but on a very complex model, when you bring it down to the size you're going to print, can result in a lot of tiny details that are too small to print.
If you post the Cura project file (.3mf, set it up in Cura like you're about to slice then go to File > Save Project) then we can probably offer advice more specific to your situation.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Cura 5.7 is here and it brings a handy new workflow improvement when using Thingiverse and Cura together, as well as additional capabilities for Method series printers, and a powerful way of sharing print settings using new printer-agnostic project files! Read on to find out about all of these improvements and more.
S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
(Sorry, was out of office when this released)
This update is for...
All UltiMaker S series
New features
Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
Recommended Posts
Slashee_the_Cow 272
It sounds like you have a complex model - those will always take time to slice, especially depending on how good your computer is. If you exported straight out of zbrush, your model likely has a very high number of faces which is very computationally intensive to slice.
If you're running Windows, Microsoft's 3D builder app is actually pretty good, and has a function where it can "simplify" the model, reducing how complex model is while affecting its look as little as possible (you can generally achieve a fairly impressive reduction with no loss in quality, especially given the limits of your average 3D printer).
Ironically it might actually be a bit quicker if they do overlap, and it would be best if you could do it as a single model. You might have to set the visible settings to "expert" or "all" to see some the settings I mention, but some things I think it's worth keeping in mind:
If you post the Cura project file (.3mf, set it up in Cura like you're about to slice then go to File > Save Project) then we can probably offer advice more specific to your situation.
Link to post
Share on other sites