UltiMaker uses functional, analytical and tracking cookies. Tracking cookies enhance your experience on our website and may also collect your personal data outside of Ultimaker websites. If you agree with the use of tracking cookies, click “I agree, continue browsing”. You can withdraw your consent at any time. If you do not consent with the use of tracking cookies, click “Refuse”. You can find more information about cookies on our Privacy and Cookie Policy page.
Sometimes cleaning stringing residures takes longer than printing itself. I use Paul&Florian's (great) settings with small changes. And those settings have all antioozing parameters in material definitions/jumps section zeroed. Sure low temp settings decreases ooze but doesn't eliminate it. It would be great to see this updated and have ooze-free printouts.
As to the problem you described I assume you play with push-on speed, pull-back speed and travel RPM settings. And push-on does not extrude enough material after the jump. Right?
The Pull-back Speed and the Push-On Speed determine the RPM rate with which the material is pulled back before the jump and pushed forwards again after the jump.
I started to wonder what does it mean "before" and "after" the jump. For how long are those RPMs executed? After all the jump is executed immediatly after extrusion ends.
I thought that maybe that is the time when Z-Jump is executed? So if the Z-offset is set to zero pull-back and push-on are effectively ignored and only travel RPM works.
To verify this I created in Netfabb two small cubes with a gap between them to make jumps and generated g-code (standard quality, hollow object) for them with the following settings:
You can clearly see z-offset before and after the jump (Z2.2500 -> Z3.2500 and back). But correct me if I'm wrong: extruder did not pull any filmanet. Pull-back value was ignored!
I did the same code for no z offset with the same result - no fiament retracting.
The only way I could make E values decrease was to set negative Travel RPM. At Travel RPM = -2 RPM code looks like this:
Fiament is retracted during the jump. But since there is no push-on after the jump extrusion starts with smaller E values than before the jump and thus with void in the nozzle.
That would explain the situation you describe, wouldn't it?
It's late and I might be missing something huge but it seems that push-on and pull-back settings are ignored altogether. That would be bug that makes restart of extrusion after a negative travel RPM jump impossible :-( Can anybody check my reasoning?
On top of that there is no comb feature in Netfabb - that makes stringing even worse.
Here comes Cura 5.9 and in this stable release we have lots of material and printer profiles for UltiMaker printers, including the newly released Sketch Sprint. Additionally, scarf seams have been introduced alongside even more print settings and improvements. Check out the rest of this article to find out the details on all of that and more
We are happy to announce the next evolution in the UltiMaker 3D printer lineup: the UltiMaker Factor 4 industrial-grade 3D printer, designed to take manufacturing to new levels of efficiency and reliability. Factor 4 is an end-to-end 3D printing solution for light industrial applications
Recommended Posts
konrad 0
Hi Makerswamp,
Sometimes cleaning stringing residures takes longer than printing itself. I use Paul&Florian's (great) settings with small changes. And those settings have all antioozing parameters in material definitions/jumps section zeroed. Sure low temp settings decreases ooze but doesn't eliminate it. It would be great to see this updated and have ooze-free printouts.
As to the problem you described I assume you play with push-on speed, pull-back speed and travel RPM settings. And push-on does not extrude enough material after the jump. Right?
Netfabb's very laconic manual here
http://wiki.netfabb.com/Material_Settin ... for_RepRap
says:
I started to wonder what does it mean "before" and "after" the jump. For how long are those RPMs executed? After all the jump is executed immediatly after extrusion ends.
I thought that maybe that is the time when Z-Jump is executed? So if the Z-offset is set to zero pull-back and push-on are effectively ignored and only travel RPM works.
To verify this I created in Netfabb two small cubes with a gap between them to make jumps and generated g-code (standard quality, hollow object) for them with the following settings:
Jump speed 180mm/s
z-jump speed 20 mm/s
pull-back speed 400 RPM
z offset 1mm
push-on speed 400 RPM
Travel RPM 0 RPM
The result for one of the middle layers:
You can clearly see z-offset before and after the jump (Z2.2500 -> Z3.2500 and back). But correct me if I'm wrong: extruder did not pull any filmanet. Pull-back value was ignored!
I did the same code for no z offset with the same result - no fiament retracting.
The only way I could make E values decrease was to set negative Travel RPM. At Travel RPM = -2 RPM code looks like this:
Fiament is retracted during the jump. But since there is no push-on after the jump extrusion starts with smaller E values than before the jump and thus with void in the nozzle.
That would explain the situation you describe, wouldn't it?
It's late and I might be missing something huge but it seems that push-on and pull-back settings are ignored altogether. That would be bug that makes restart of extrusion after a negative travel RPM jump impossible :-( Can anybody check my reasoning?
On top of that there is no comb feature in Netfabb - that makes stringing even worse.
Edit: Only after writing the above I found confirmation from noone else but Paul http://groups.google.com/group/ultimaker/browse_thread/thread/7511401e952b586c/2c7df6ff0e8dca94?show_docid=2c7df6ff0e8dca94&pli=1. Note to self: use more Google BEFORE. It wouldn't hurt, though, if Netfabb manual didn't describe features that aren't implemented/are not working.
Link to post
Share on other sites