Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
Sign in to follow this  
alaris2

sequence and bridge settings

Recommended Posts

can anyone tell me why I'd want to change the sequence settings? I note the first layer is by default done differently from the others - why is this? what are the benefits of one sequence over another?

and has anyone experimented with bridge settings other than 100% - any success stories or otherwise?

cheers, nik

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The default sequence of loops->perimeter->infill works best for overhang cases, where the perimeter can be "glued" against the loops, before shrinkage of the infill makes the loops a bit smaller.

The first layer is printed at a different sequence because it doesn't have overhang. And then printing the perimeter first gives the best results, as the perimeter can cool down then before the rest it attached to it, giving less warping.

You can change this sequence because for some types of prints a different sequence is better. If you want watertight cups/vases for example, then you want to start with the infill. But in general you almost never need to touch these settings.

As for the bridge settings, the next version will no longer have a bridge material amount setting, as it did not work properly, and affects the whole layer with the bridge in it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks Daid - so if i foolishly changed the default sequence to match the first layer sequence, I'd probably expect the perimeters of the object to not attach properly, perhaps even break up on parts with overhang? (since it will effectively be printing in thin air?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Depending on the amount of overhang on your model it might just work fine. The setting is not so bad that it messes up your whole print, it just comes out a bit better with the default in most cases.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • Taking Advantage of DfAM
      This is a statement that’s often made about AM/3DP. I'll focus on the way DfAM can take advantage of some of the unique capabilities that AM and 3DP have to offer. I personally think that the use of AM/3DP for light-weighting is one of it’s most exciting possibilities and one that could play a key part in the sustainability of design and manufacturing in the future.
        • Like
      • 3 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!