Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
Sign in to follow this  

14.12-RC9 problem

Recommended Posts

Some version back, bridges would be filled at standard 45degres.

Now it fills everything else at 45 but bridges are filling in different angle.

I have a bridge 1 inch wide (left to right) 1/4 long (front to back)

New way of filling that bridge makes longer filling passes (almost left to right) VS 45degrees shorted one.

It causes allot of sagging.

Shorter passes would make it sag less.

Instead, it should have gone the other direction, filling it at 0degrees (front to back)

. Filling bridge going less possible distance would be better, but in this case it went the most distance causing too much sag and gaps in the initial overhang.

Is there some menu where i can change that or is this permanent bridge detection feature going to stay the same way forever ?



Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

"some version back" is a bit unspecific.

I did change the bridge detection algorithm a bit to be less broken (as bridge detection is a complex problem). But that was more then 6 months ago... so a few releases back...

The idea is to span bridges by printing in the direction of the bridge. This works great, as it's pretty much the only way you can print in the air.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

You're example is incomplete, where are the "supported" areas, and where are the unsupported areas? Kinda bit of important information that is only in your head and not in the picture.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


If this object is printed as it is pictured, then my example picture would give you good idea of a bridge am having problem with. You have 4 bridges there if the model is printed as its pictured.

Once cura makes up the perimeter at the top of any of those holes, then it would start filling it in at a strange angle instead of going 90degrees for shorter [wall to wall] distance.

I still think that when you have a rectangular bridge, you gotta go 90degrees from wall to wall that are closest to each other, but in this new version its the other way around.


Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • Introducing Ultimaker Cura 3.6 | Beta
      Ultimaker Cura 3.6 | Beta is available. It comes with new features, bug fixes, and UX improvements. We would really like to have your feedback on it to make our stable release as good as it can be. As always, you can download the beta for free from our website, for Windows, MacOS, and Linux.
        • Like
      • 95 replies
    • Print Core CC | Red for Ruby
      Q: For some users, abrasive materials may be a new subject matter. Can you explain what it is that makes a material abrasive when you are not sure which print core to use?
      A: Materials which are hard in a solid piece (like metals, ceramics and carbon fibers) will generally also wear down the nozzle. In general one should assume...
        • Like
      • 30 replies
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!