Jump to content

Gigi

Member
  • Posts

    133
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Gigi

  1. In my point of view next step for UM3 are the feeders.

    I have already made some test at 20 microns layer some time ago,

    and i was told by the Ultimaker team that i will stress too much the feeders.

    So that will be the next logical step.

    Maybe.... Ruby Print core + New Feeders.

    PS. Maybe stepper with higher precision.

    • Like 1
  2. On 4/5/2019 at 10:01 PM, gr5 said:

    I don't think UM realizes the scope of the problem.  Or maybe I'm completely wrong and it's only 10 people in the world who have issues with the upgrade and UM realizes this and they will fix this at some point.  But right now my impression is that UM doesn't understand how big the problem is and most people are just downgrading on their own.  I think if they knew how big the problem was they would have disabled the 5.2 upgrade 2 weeks ago.

     

    Or maybe to take serious this forum.

    Or even to explain how to solve the problems after upgrade. 

  3. UM3. Cura 4, firmware 5.2 on printer. No problem, except IP address added manually on Cura.

    By the way it seems to me that stepper motors sound different , it think they run smoothly.

    Or is just an imagination ?

  4. 1 hour ago, robinmdh said:

    P.P.P.S: This is getting hugely off topic, should we continue with a new thread about abrasive resistant print cores?

    First step was 0.8 AA and 0.25 AA cores.

    FDM printers will always be superior to SLA printers because of hard materials.

    I don't think will be an SLA that will print with carbon fiber,

    I think now you understand my point of vue.

    By the way, before S5 came out, i did say that the XY axle should be longer to use all the buid plate no matter what combinaition of cores you choose.

×
×
  • Create New...