Cuq
-
Posts
676 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
18
Content Type
Forums
Events
3D Prints
Posts posted by Cuq
-
-
I must admit that I wondered if it was not the case 🤣
-
You're a GENIUS @GregValiant. On top Of that it also partialy solved the issue of too long parameter list !! Thanks a lot It will become my new prefered Cura configuration !
-
It shouldn't be too hard to implement, once the part is flattened we use the ConvexHull geometry as for the nesting function, keeping the longest vector and aligning it with X or Y by a rotation around Z should do the job.
-
What happens when you exceed the available space in the toolbar ? Buy a bigger screen ? 🙂
-
10000€ et doubler la mise ??? C est quoi comme station de travail ?
-
Hello,
I don't quite understand the effect of the postpone_emit option on the removeInstance function in Cura's management for the ContainerStack ? If someone could enlighten me on this point it would be nice. @nallath ?
-
First release in the MarketPlace :
https://marketplace.ultimaker.com/app/cura/plugins/5axes/NameIt
A V1.5.0 have been submited to intergrate this Enhancement Request : https://github.com/5axes/NameIt/discussions/10
-
Un onzième en ligne : Name It
Plugin Cura pour ajouter un texte d'identification à une pièce d'impression : https://github.com/5axes/NameIt
Sur le marché : https://marketplace.ultimaker.com/app/cura/plugins/5axes/NameIt
-
1
-
-
Hello,
You can do a lot of things with a postprocessing script. But it will be not so easy, You will also need to manage the E Value ( test if you are in relative or absolute extrusion mode. You will also need to manage the retract movements Z hop if you decide to use this option etc.
It's possible but it's not an quick and easy job. You can start from a sample script like this one to already have a structur and some basic subroutine : https://github.com/5axes/Cura-Postprocessing-Scripts/blob/master/GradientInfill.py
-
No, just because it hasn't been updated for Cura 5.0
-
1
-
-
-
Note: Cura has a unique function compared to other slicers. If the model is placed (totally or partially) under the build plate . The part is not automatically placed flat on the plate. This is intended either to allow printing a part that the bottom is not completely flat or to cut only a part of the part. Could be the origine of your issue ???
-
Not sure of that but when I read your messages I don't see where is the issue in Cura, As it was already mentionned with the mesh tool of @fieldOfView plugin plus the Auto orientation one from @nallath I don't see any situation which cannot be solved without spending "tons of times" to place some models on the builtplate. So I certainly missing something. A short video of your procedure should be welcome to understand your issue.
-
1
-
-
No they prefer use the source code of the other, change the name and the logo to produce their "own" slicer. Chinese Opensource understanding.
-
2
-
-
Welcome to the club 🙂
I don't know if it's the solution. But I solved my issue with :
toolItem: UM.ColorImage { source: Qt.resolvedUrl("type_custom.svg") color: UM.Theme.getColor("icon") }
could be a beggining of solution for you
-
Ou il est aussi possible d'attendre, pour moi je pense une version "apaisée" en 5.2
-
4 hours ago, GregValiant said:
There is a slicer (PrusaSlicer?) that does math in the StartUp and End gcodes but I'm not sure if it can do logic.
Just for Information Yes they can do it ( Prusa And SuperSlicer) Ie for Ender-3 end Gcode
-
no, no ... Just the file Ultimaker Cura 5.0.0\cura\Scene\ConvexHullDecorator.py and its comments 🤗
-
Must be tested : https://github.com/5axes/TabPlus/blob/V1.0.1/resources/scripts/ReduceZBrim.py
I don't have time to do it these days.
The last release with some minor modifications and 3 scripts
https://github.com/5axes/TabPlus/releases/tag/V1.0.1
-
1
-
-
Not really because in this case we change just the layer height of the SKIRT Section (Change the Z value AND the flow via M221 : I made an error in my previous post with M220 sorry) . As the Skirt doesn't support any other layer, there is on my point of view no issue to do that ( but of course this idea must be tested to be sure of that ) .
Note : parameter "Support Brim Width" in this case must be set to 0 !
And If you fix a value in this case you can have some issue but as we are talking about support, I don't think it will be a problem to have a gap of between the Skirp and the second support layer.
My actual script to to the opposite (MultiBrim) : https://github.com/5axes/TabPlus/blob/main/resources/scripts/MultiBrim.py
-
By using a postprocessing script , yes , you can easily decrease the layer height and reduce the flow according to this reduction by using a M220 instruction, I have a script to increase the layer height, do the opposite should not be difficult.
Actual plugin source code : https://github.com/5axes/TabPlus
-
I hate this kind of situation... finally writing the question gives me the answer...
Well I didn't lose everything and maybe one day someone will have the same question
The answer are : _compute2DConvexHull
-
1
-
-
Hello Again the Cura Expert,
In my current code I'm using :
hull_polygon = node.callDecoration("getConvexHull")
hull_polygon = node.callDecoration("getConvexHull")
and
hull_polygon = node.callDecoration("getAdhesionArea")
Works great. But I have an issue with getConvexHull according to the source code in case of one-at-a-time, this includes adhesion and head+fans clearance. Is there any method to keep the "minimal" ConvexHull and not the getConvexHullHeadFull.
Best regards,
Cuq
-
One small step for mankind one giant leap for me 😄
-
2
-
Lay Flat Center object and Rotate Object BUG question
in UltiMaker Cura
Posted
I'm rather thinking of an integration into an existing plugin 😁 something regarding mesh manipulation. But need to test the concept before