Jump to content

nallath

Team-Ultimaker
  • Content Count

    3,183
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    30

nallath last won the day on August 13

nallath had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

674 Excellent

2 Followers

About nallath

  • Birthday 03/05/1990

Personal Information

Recent Profile Visitors

6,694 profile views
  1. We switched out the way that this is handled for 4.3, so i expect that this won't be an issue for that release anymore.
  2. Did you contact 3dlac.com? They claim that they are official resellers.
  3. Ah, There seem to have been a corruption in one of the profiles, which makes it select an empty profile. After removing those "creality_cr-10_empty" profiles from the configuration (you can find them in the quality_changes folder), everything seems to work fine.
  4. Well, it would be a great help if you could share your configuration folder. You can find that in ~/.local/share/cura/
  5. Issues about cura are best raised at https://github.com/Ultimaker/Cura/issues/new/choose That being said; we will need a lot more information in order to resolve your issue. So try to provide reproduction steps and logs
  6. Please report issues on https://github.com/Ultimaker/Cura/issues/new/choose together with log files generated by Cura.
  7. Issues / feedback regarding Cura are best reported on github https://github.com/Ultimaker/Cura/issues/new/choose To go a bit more in depth; Zoom towards mouse is something that I've added in my own time a while ago. I don't think a whole lot of people are using it, which is probably why it's not been having a lot of attention (you're actually the third or fourth person that I've heard from that uses it). As for the rotation; This is intentional. The camera isn't a "real" free-form camera. It makes more sense to have a free-form camera in a 3D design program, but take into account that Cura isn't that. It's a CAM program, so it's focus is on the build plate. Combining the more "freeform ish" aproach with this is a bit annoying, i do get that, but fixing it would require a fair bit of rework (and again; I did it in my own time and since few people seem to use it (or they might, they just didn't tell me)) i couldn't be bothered a whole lot by that.
  8. There is no feature that can do this and there is no plugin that I know of that can do this.
  9. You can't. They don't have enough room to store the entire xml file. They just hold an identifier (the GUID) that links them with an xml profile.
  10. That would be interesting as there is no code on the machine that can do that. (Here is me hoping that it didnt' suddenly become sentient...)
  11. We're trying to stabilise the API's (we did a piss poor job on that before), so i hope that these checks wont be necessary anymore.
  12. Wait, you're printing with the second extruder? I think we never actually tried to see what happens if you do that with one at a time printing...
  13. Not by means of the interface, sorry.
  14. Well, the slicing preview looks fine. The one reason we could come up with how this happens is that you head couldn't move that far and it just squished the lines there, but that would mean you'd see a fair bit of over extrusion.
  15. You could try enabling ironing. That should improve the quality of the top surface.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!