-
Posts
676 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
18
Content Type
Forums
Events
3D Prints
Posts posted by Cuq
-
-
Unfortunately the RetractTower script does not work with the UM2 on the standard configuration. By default these machines use the firmware Retract code (G10/G11) so the values are not modified by the script and are only driven by the parameters set on the machine. I don't have this machine but maybe if you disable the firmware control in the cura parameters it will work.
https://github.com/5axes/Calibration-Shapes/wiki/Retract-Tower#note
-
Marlin flavor in my case but as GCode are mainly different on M Code instruction which should not have any influence on the creation of the final rendering this should not generate any particular problems.
-
I don't know just downloaded the Windows Voxelizer for Fab version : https://zmorph3d.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/voxelizer3.0.0.msi_.zip No issue in my case.
Then Just Import GCode -> VOXELIZE PRECISE -> Then Export STL
- 1
-
-
Hello @MariMakes,
Yes you are right, It's the same behaviour. Sorry for the confusion.
-
You can find also his request here : https://github.com/5axes/CustomSupportCylinder/discussions/24
- 1
-
-
https://github.com/smartavionics/Cura/discussions/185
But only in the Cura 4.20 fork of Cura from smartavionics.
-
-
11 hours ago, RayW said:
When you print 2mm tall text, what's the width of the stroke and the line with? How are you printing narrow lines like that with a .4mm nozzle? Are there other slicer adjustments required (speed, retractions, feed rate)?
As mentionned in the wiki page I've designed this Font to be print with the 5.0 release of Cura . 2 mm is the minimum for a 0.4 nozzle and in this case the width is equal to 0.4 or closed to 0.4, and you will have just one wall. But I don't recommend this size, with this nozzle size. It can be used just to indicate something but you will not get a clean text.
4mm (0.8 width) is a prefered choice in this case.
-
I Don't know, but it should not be an issue
-
35 minutes ago, RayW said:
@Cuq
I like that font. From everything that's been discussed here, it looks like it has the right attributes. I assume it's not yet available as a .ttf file. When you print 2mm tall text, what's the width of the stroke and the line with? How are you printing narrow lines like that with a .4mm nozzle? Are there other slicer adjustments required (speed, retractions, feed rate)?The ttf file is available under the indicate link, as well as the project file if you want to modify the font
-
You must associate the Extruder N°2 to the support blocker. (right clic on the Support blocker and select extruder N°2)
- 1
-
Interesting discussion that I had already asked on other forum without real definitive solution and which concerned the best Fonts for 3D FFF printing.
Preferably : Sans Serif, Bold, Rounded
Finally I decided to create my own font that would give me the best results. But the project is still in progress. And for a 0.4 nozzle the minimum size seems to be 2 mm. For 1,5 you have to use 0.2 as indicated by @GregValiant.
A link : https://github.com/5axes/NameIt/wiki/New-Font-:-NameIt-Rounded-Bold
The initial requirements :
- Printing a single outer contour,
- No interior infill
- Continuous and rounded motion that minimizes letter wraping when printing the first layer
-
-
There are always some discussions about Infill density versus print time and part strength . An interesting video :
Not sure that 100% give the best result, Layer Height , and Wall Number are also important. And one point I think : Linear Infill is any way a better choice for stress distribution and adhesion between layers.
-
Strange Infill Method :
Infill Density = 99%
Infill Pattern = Concentric
Connect Infill Polygons = On
Is it realy necessar ?
- 1
-
1 hour ago, gr5 said:
Looks good. Interesting that you have to subtract 1 TWICE from layer_number. I'm guessing that the last layer or two are not actually layer information but are instead like the finishing up stuff and final gcodes and comments at the bottom.
Yes you are right,if I'm remember correctly the first layer it's the first general informations , the second one it's the start Gcode. And the third it's the first layer. But in python as the list index start a 0 :
0 comment
1 start Gcode
2 First layer -> 2-1=1 Layer number 1
note in the Gcode first layer it's layer 0
-
Infill Travel Optimization is only visible if Combing Mode is not OFF
-
Ce que veux dire L'ambassadeur, c'est que le plugin n'a pas été mis à jour pour le passage à la V5 . Donc pas disponible jusqu'à que quelqu'un veuille faire la mise à jour, puisque le développeur du plugin visiblement n'a pas prévu de faire ce travail.
Donc 4.X ou Export STL en attendant.
Bon courage,
- 1
-
If you have some values in your profile for these parameters they automaticaly overwrite the material profile values. So you need to be sure to remove from your profile specific parameters like printing temps, retractions, etc
It's not an easy job to do because as soon as you have modify/change one of these parameters it's too late, there is no function to go back. In the Ultimaker world it's easy because profile are validate and created by Ultimaker; for the other people you must have a very good knowledge of the uses of the Cura stacked profile system and of the parameters in the profiles. A good start https://github.com/Ultimaker/Cura/wiki/Profiles-&-Settings
I use a specific plugin to clean up troublesome settings but the nature of the operation and the level of Cura users concerning these knowleges do not allow a general use of this tool.
- 1
-
Have you read the wiki page ? https://github.com/5axes/Calibration-Shapes/wiki/Retract-Tower
-
The NX interface was (is using) a NX Vb script to detect the last Cura Release . And this script is searching in the registry key
Const strKeyPath = "SOFTWARE\WOW6432Node\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall"
but Cura 5.X doesn't use anymore this WOW6432Node folder. Have you try to modify "SOFTWARE\WOW6432Node\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall" into "SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall" ?
-
Not sure of that but last drivers Intel 3000 video card are compatible DirectX 10.1 and OpenGL 3.1 but for Cura you need OpenGL 4.1
Retract Tests: Can't Change Retraction Distance + Speed settings, also not visible?
in UltiMaker Cura
Posted · Edited by Cuq
Note : For the missing Retract parameters if you use an Ultimaker 2 it's normal, for the same reason. As you are not suppose to modify the values form Cura but only on the machine these parameters are not visible.
[Edit ] Oups ! The answer was already provided by @gr5 in his post.