Jump to content

Question.. what target poly resolution should I shoot for for the Ultimaker 2.0 extended +


Recommended Posts

Posted · Question.. what target poly resolution should I shoot for for the Ultimaker 2.0 extended +

I've got some models I've done in the past and wanted to know what upper limit I should shoot for as far as the number of polys in an object?

I'm using lightwave 3d and zbrush, and zbrush can go crazy high on polycount, but I should be able to decimate my stuff down for whatever the ultimaker needs.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Question.. what target poly resolution should I shoot for for the Ultimaker 2.0 extended +

    Last year I printed something from a scan. The raw model had 700,000+ faces and that plus down to around 400,000 faces screwed several pieces of software I sometimes use; I did not get as far as Cura and printing. I decimated down to 80,000 and that was fine but I have no idea if that is a good target to aim for or whether it is smarter to go lower or higher; my output normally comes from Solidworks and is not something I pay any attention to.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Question.. what target poly resolution should I shoot for for the Ultimaker 2.0 extended +

    That at least gives me a start. I've searched online, but can seem to find any recommended upper limit.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Question.. what target poly resolution should I shoot for for the Ultimaker 2.0 extended +

    It really depends on the size of the model you're printing. You should import your model into cura, and zoom out until it's almost real life size. If you see large facets, you will likely see them in your print. If it looks mostly rounded/detailed, you're good to go.

    Generally zbrush models are already way high in polycount for 3D printing.

    If you have too many polys it will simply slow down your slice and you won't gain any additional detail in your print. So judge by the size you're planning on printing and adaptively decimate.

    As a guideline, if you imagine a 4cm diameter cylinder, 160 segments would be a good place to be to make it round and not facety. You need less for mechanical shapes.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Question.. what target poly resolution should I shoot for for the Ultimaker 2.0 extended +

    Understood, but zbrush has excellent decimation tools for reducing polycount. The problem is I don't know what max ultimaker can take so I know what the top bar to stay under actually is, and I haven't been able to find that in the documentation anywhere.

    There has to be a file size or polycount that exceeds what ultimaker can handle, and that's what I'm trying to discover.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Question.. what target poly resolution should I shoot for for the Ultimaker 2.0 extended +

    Just loaded a 200,000 faces model into Cura OK. I then loaded a 680,000 face model in but it was too big. I scaled it to 80% and it fitted and was OK. Now whether it was still 680,00 faces or 80% of that I have no idea

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Question.. what target poly resolution should I shoot for for the Ultimaker 2.0 extended +

    Hmmm that's interesting... I wonder if there is some correlation between model poly density and model size?

    I'd think since slicing a larger print creates more slicing data, that it's cutting into the amount of memory allocated to poly count ?

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Question.. what target poly resolution should I shoot for for the Ultimaker 2.0 extended +

    Hmmm that's interesting... I wonder if there is some correlation between model poly density and model size?

    I'd think since slicing a larger print creates more slicing data, that it's cutting into the amount of  memory allocated to poly count ?

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Question.. what target poly resolution should I shoot for for the Ultimaker 2.0 extended +

    Ah I think you misunderstood me. When I said the 2nd model was too big, I meant that it's physical dimensions were too large to fit the build plate, not that it had too many faces.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Question.. what target poly resolution should I shoot for for the Ultimaker 2.0 extended +

    Ah, gotcha! Thanks for the clarification.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
      • Ultimaker Cura 5.6 stable released
        Cura now supports Method series printers!
         
        A year after the merger of Ultimaker and MakerBotQQ, we have unlocked the ability for users of our Method series printers to slice files using UltiMaker Cura. As of this release, users can find profiles for our Method and Method XL printers, as well as material profiles for ABS-R, ABS-CF, and RapidRinse. Meaning it’s now possible to use either Cura or the existing cloud-slicing software CloudPrint when printing with these printers or materials
        • 48 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...