Jump to content
Cura Connect | Survey Read more... ×
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
Sign in to follow this  
ian

Testing 3d negative intersection space.

Recommended Posts

ok first test.

this is archicad 15. a very popular arch 2d and 3d program used here in germany.

For testing, I have simply placed 3 walls together and intersected 2.

this is to symbolise the typical 3d model from an archiect, with 3d elements, intersection within one another.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
why not just post the file somewhere and we'll fix it for you. it would save a whole load of pain..

yes but thats not the point !

i use a lot of archicad model files for printing at the moment.

and if i dont understand, how to fix or edit my my models, so i dont get these crazy negative intersection spaces, then im going to simply have to rebuild fresh in cinema every single model.

That is hours, some times days of work !

I have to learn a working process and that is the reason behind this tread.

Ian

ps. thank you for your offer of help !!

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

perhaps I didn't use enough words in that last post, hence my meaning was unclear -

if you post a file, we can work out what is 'wrong' about it, hence can feed that back to you to change your design flow.

for example, I know of several ways to create inside-out geometry (what you refer to as -ve space) but I can't be sure which one you're currently falling into the trap of (or perhaps you've found yet another)

as a starter for 10, it looks like your model here consists of 5 cuboids and the places where they intersect are causing you problems.

an easy way to create -ve space is to merely group them all in your 3d package. when you export as .stl, the faces inside of others will create the very problem you see here. the order you create the cuboids can occasionally influence which become -ve.

the correct way for most packages is to boolean (union) all of the objects in the scene before export. if you have more than one object in your scene before export, it nearly always causes problems such as -ve space and also if 2 objects sit one on top the other, a slight gap will occur in the stl, leading to weak construction.

actually this last point is interesting in itself. take 2 cuboids and place them one on top the other. export and print. the finished model looks OK at first sight, but often the walls don't quite line up correctly (looks like a model MCUrunner posted recently) and if you hit it against a surface, the model will fracture at the join.

now boolean union and print again. the model becomes a continuous and much stronger model without the strange joints on printing.

you can use this to your advantage when you want to print 'break away' pieces, but that's another topic..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, good news is my previous post is basically correct, so no need to write tons here :)

your 3ds model consists of an object called 'null' - probably a ground plain or background? I don't this is causing problems, but it's superfluous anyway.

it also has a group, consisting of 5 objects. the individual blocks.

so I loaded it in the *free* hexagon from daz studios. I was trying to find a package you could also use.

if you export as stl, then slice, even in the best slicer in the world you'll find problems as seen below -

negative_space.jpg

notice how k'slicer tries to preserve the perimeters of all the blocks. it's not what you see on the outside that counts, but the internal geometry. it creates -ve space around the perimeters since it can't decide how to represent these areas. it's not quite as bad as SF (Cura) but still wouldn't print how you wanted it, and the model will be structurally weak.

the solution, is to ungroup and then boolean union all the parts together to make a single part. now i can't answer how to do that in your original package, but it isn't difficult from hexagon - select object, hit boolean, select next object, click 'union'. repeat until only one object.

the result of slicing this model is seen below - now that's what you probably intended..

corrected.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • Architect Design Contest | People
      The goal of this contest is to design a set of people figurines that could be used in such a project to make an area, office or mall seem populated. 
      Think of different types of people in different environments, like walking people, people standing still, working people, and both men and women.
       
      • 8 replies
    • Taking Advantage of DfAM
      This is a statement that’s often made about AM/3DP. I'll focus on the way DfAM can take advantage of some of the unique capabilities that AM and 3DP have to offer. I personally think that the use of AM/3DP for light-weighting is one of it’s most exciting possibilities and one that could play a key part in the sustainability of design and manufacturing in the future.
        • Like
      • 3 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!