Jump to content
UltiMaker Community of 3D Printing Experts

Testing 3d negative intersection space.


ian

Recommended Posts

Posted · Testing 3d negative intersection space.

ok first test.

this is archicad 15. a very popular arch 2d and 3d program used here in germany.

For testing, I have simply placed 3 walls together and intersected 2.

this is to symbolise the typical 3d model from an archiect, with 3d elements, intersection within one another.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Testing 3d negative intersection space.

    ok test 2

    i have offset the height of two of the walls in archicad.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Testing 3d negative intersection space.

    ok the soffset now in cinema (dxf)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Testing 3d negative intersection space.

    offset in cura,,,, works

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Testing 3d negative intersection space.

    ok test 3.

    simply solid basement elements intersecting one another.

    archicad 15

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Testing 3d negative intersection space.

    dxf in cinema4d

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Testing 3d negative intersection space.

    and now as stl through cura.

    BANG !!!................ UNDERPANTS !!!! :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Testing 3d negative intersection space.

    ok testing objest, export from archicad in OBJ format and directly into cura.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Testing 3d negative intersection space.

    direct export object OBJ into Cura.

    Doesnt look good. :-(

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Testing 3d negative intersection space.

    ok test from OBJ to STL in Cinema4D.

    Exact same problem with negative intersection space. :-(

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Testing 3d negative intersection space.

    test 4

    exporting from archicad 15 in 3Ds file format.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Testing 3d negative intersection space.

    ok archicad, export to 3DS and then in cinema4d, exported out as stl.

    ...................UNDERPANTS !!! :cry: :cry: :cry:

    same problem as all the above

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Testing 3d negative intersection space.

    why not just post the file somewhere and we'll fix it for you. it would save a whole load of pain..

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Testing 3d negative intersection space.
    why not just post the file somewhere and we'll fix it for you. it would save a whole load of pain..

    yes but thats not the point !

    i use a lot of archicad model files for printing at the moment.

    and if i dont understand, how to fix or edit my my models, so i dont get these crazy negative intersection spaces, then im going to simply have to rebuild fresh in cinema every single model.

    That is hours, some times days of work !

    I have to learn a working process and that is the reason behind this tread.

    Ian

    ps. thank you for your offer of help !!

    :D

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Testing 3d negative intersection space.

    perhaps I didn't use enough words in that last post, hence my meaning was unclear -

    if you post a file, we can work out what is 'wrong' about it, hence can feed that back to you to change your design flow.

    for example, I know of several ways to create inside-out geometry (what you refer to as -ve space) but I can't be sure which one you're currently falling into the trap of (or perhaps you've found yet another)

    as a starter for 10, it looks like your model here consists of 5 cuboids and the places where they intersect are causing you problems.

    an easy way to create -ve space is to merely group them all in your 3d package. when you export as .stl, the faces inside of others will create the very problem you see here. the order you create the cuboids can occasionally influence which become -ve.

    the correct way for most packages is to boolean (union) all of the objects in the scene before export. if you have more than one object in your scene before export, it nearly always causes problems such as -ve space and also if 2 objects sit one on top the other, a slight gap will occur in the stl, leading to weak construction.

    actually this last point is interesting in itself. take 2 cuboids and place them one on top the other. export and print. the finished model looks OK at first sight, but often the walls don't quite line up correctly (looks like a model MCUrunner posted recently) and if you hit it against a surface, the model will fracture at the join.

    now boolean union and print again. the model becomes a continuous and much stronger model without the strange joints on printing.

    you can use this to your advantage when you want to print 'break away' pieces, but that's another topic..

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Testing 3d negative intersection space.

    thank your explainning every thing.

    here is my model file.

    http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:34421

    im really interested to see what you think about it ?

    Ian :-)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Testing 3d negative intersection space.

    OK, good news is my previous post is basically correct, so no need to write tons here :)

    your 3ds model consists of an object called 'null' - probably a ground plain or background? I don't this is causing problems, but it's superfluous anyway.

    it also has a group, consisting of 5 objects. the individual blocks.

    so I loaded it in the *free* hexagon from daz studios. I was trying to find a package you could also use.

    if you export as stl, then slice, even in the best slicer in the world you'll find problems as seen below -

    negative_space.jpg

    notice how k'slicer tries to preserve the perimeters of all the blocks. it's not what you see on the outside that counts, but the internal geometry. it creates -ve space around the perimeters since it can't decide how to represent these areas. it's not quite as bad as SF (Cura) but still wouldn't print how you wanted it, and the model will be structurally weak.

    the solution, is to ungroup and then boolean union all the parts together to make a single part. now i can't answer how to do that in your original package, but it isn't difficult from hexagon - select object, hit boolean, select next object, click 'union'. repeat until only one object.

    the result of slicing this model is seen below - now that's what you probably intended..

    corrected.jpg

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Testing 3d negative intersection space.

    (for reference, it's a slice about half way up the model. green = top surface, blue= interior fill)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Testing 3d negative intersection space.

    AutoCAD simply has the command "UNION"... might be similar in Archicad...

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Testing 3d negative intersection space.

    i wish in cinema 4d there was an auto bolean option.

    when i have a model with 2000 parts, it kinda gets crazy doing 2000 bolean options inside one another... computer seems to have a problem as well... ;-)

    Ian

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.3 stable released
        In this stable release, Cura 5.3 achieves yet another huge leap forward in 3D printing thanks to material interlocking! As well as introducing an expanded recommended print settings menu and lots of print quality improvements. Not to mention, a whole bunch of new printer profiles for non-UltiMaker printers!
          • Thanks
          • Like
        • 31 replies
      • Here it is. The new UltiMaker S7
        The UltiMaker S7 is built on the success of the UltiMaker S5 and its design decisions were heavily based on feedback from customers.
         
         
        So what’s new?
        The obvious change is the S7’s height. It now includes an integrated Air Manager. This filters the exhaust air of every print and also improves build temperature stability. To further enclose the build chamber the S7 only has one magnetically latched door.
         
        The build stack has also been completely redesigned. A PEI-coated flexible steel build plate makes a big difference to productivity. Not only do you not need tools to pop a printed part off. But we also don’t recommend using or adhesion structures for UltiMaker materials (except PC, because...it’s PC). Along with that, 4 pins and 25 magnets make it easy to replace the flex plate perfectly – even with one hand.
         
        The re-engineered print head has an inductive sensor which reduces noise when probing the build plate. This effectively makes it much harder to not achieve a perfect first layer, improving overall print success. We also reversed the front fan direction (fewer plastic hairs, less maintenance), made the print core door magnets stronger, and add a sensor that helps avoid flooding.
         

         
        The UltiMaker S7 also includes quality of life improvements:
        Reliable bed tilt compensation (no more thumbscrews) 2.4 and 5 GHz Wi-Fi A 1080p camera (mounted higher for a better view) Compatibility with 280+ Marketplace materials Compatibility with S5 project files (no reslicing needed) And a whole lot more  
        Curious to see the S7 in action?
        We’re hosting a free tech demo on February 7.
        It will be live and you can ask any questions to our CTO, Miguel Calvo.
        Register here for the Webinar
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • UltiMaker Cura Alpha 🎄 Tree Support Spotlight 🎄
        Are you a fan of tree support, but dislike the removal process and the amount of filament it uses? Then we would like to invite you to try this special release of UltiMaker Cura. Brought to you by our special community contributor @thomasrahm
         
        We generated a special version of Cura 5.2 called 5.3.0 Alpha + Xmas. The only changes we introduced compared to UltiMaker Cura 5.2.1 are those which are needed for the new supports. So keep in mind, this is not a sneak peek for Cura 5.3 (there are some really cool new features coming up) but a spotlight release highlighting this new version of tree supports.  
          • Like
        • 25 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...