UltiMaker uses functional, analytical and tracking cookies. Tracking cookies enhance your experience on our website and may also collect your personal data outside of Ultimaker websites. If you agree with the use of tracking cookies, click “I agree, continue browsing”. You can withdraw your consent at any time. If you do not consent with the use of tracking cookies, click “Refuse”. You can find more information about cookies on our Privacy and Cookie Policy page.
I assume you are using volumetric mode in netfabb. The problem with every slicer I've ever used is no single calibration object covers everything you are going to print. Without going into the possible reasons behind my observation, I can only recommend that you scale each model when you find unacceptable dimensional errors. Unfortunately, even this customization often results in imperfect dimensions because not all of the dimensional errors found in a print are equal--percentage wise. If the errors are not in proportion, you can't apply a global fudge factor for each of the axis to correct all errors. You must compromise.
I have an Ulticontroller so I perfer to temporarily change the X-steps and Y-steps (I've not found Z-steps to ever require changing). Be aware that I've also found larger dimensional errors with nf when a part is printed on the diagonal of the bed instead of square--more so than when using Cura or Kisslicer, for example. nf appears to be somewhat "Pythagorean challenged!" :(
Link to post
Share on other sites
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
The full stable release of UltiMaker Cura 5.4 is here and it makes it easier than ever to remove brims and supports from your finished prints. UltiMaker S series users can also look forward to print profiles for our newest UltiMaker PET CF composite material!
Recommended Posts
calinb 11
I assume you are using volumetric mode in netfabb. The problem with every slicer I've ever used is no single calibration object covers everything you are going to print. Without going into the possible reasons behind my observation, I can only recommend that you scale each model when you find unacceptable dimensional errors. Unfortunately, even this customization often results in imperfect dimensions because not all of the dimensional errors found in a print are equal--percentage wise. If the errors are not in proportion, you can't apply a global fudge factor for each of the axis to correct all errors. You must compromise.
I have an Ulticontroller so I perfer to temporarily change the X-steps and Y-steps (I've not found Z-steps to ever require changing). Be aware that I've also found larger dimensional errors with nf when a part is printed on the diagonal of the bed instead of square--more so than when using Cura or Kisslicer, for example. nf appears to be somewhat "Pythagorean challenged!" :(
Link to post
Share on other sites