Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
kc8iqw

Unexpected 1st layer behavior

Recommended Posts

I currently have the following Start Gcode for my printer:

M355 S1 ; Enable lighting
G28 ; home all axes
M104 S{material_print_temperature_layer_0} ; Extuder
M140 S{material_bed_temperature_layer_0} ; Bed Temp
M116 ; Temp Wait
G1 Z5 F5000 ; lift nozzle

material_bed_temperature_layer_0 inserts, as expected, the value for "Build Plate Temperature Initial Layer"

material_print_temperature_layer_0 WAS, at one time, inserting the value for "Printing Temperature Initial Layer" (currently 230).  However it has recently started putting in 210 and that value is nowhere in the Material settings that I can find.

 

Any assistance would GREATLY be appreciated.  I have to save and edit the file every time which is a hassle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the same problem.   It's a regression bug in Cura 3.1, and is supposed to be fixed in 3.2.    

 

 

As a workaround, you could just change your startup gcode to S230 for now, then change it back whenever 3.2 comes out.   Not ideal, but at least you won't have to edit every gcode file.

 

/Frank

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I found a workaround by accident.   If your startup gcode contains no reference to any print temperatures (no {material_print_temperature} variants, even in a comment), Cura will automatically prepend the gcode

     M104 S{material_print_temperature_layer_0}

     M109 S{material_print_temperature_layer_0}

before your startup code, with the correct temperatures.

 

This is going to wait for the nozzle to get fully up to temperature before doing anything else (including heating the bed) so it might not be the best solution.

 

/Frank

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Aye, thanks for the responses guys.  Cura 3.1 has been acting stranger and stranger giving me different results each time the gcode is generated, reading part of a circle as a straight line (or at least telling the printer that) and all sorts of other buggy behavior.  Mind you the .stl file is 100% manifold.  I'll wait for 3.2 and go back to slic3r for now :(.  I really LOVE all of the options Cura gives allowing me to correct various issues and giving me cleaner prints.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • Introducing Ultimaker Cura 3.6 | Beta
      Ultimaker Cura 3.6 | Beta is available. It comes with new features, bug fixes, and UX improvements. We would really like to have your feedback on it to make our stable release as good as it can be. As always, you can download the beta for free from our website, for Windows, MacOS, and Linux.
        • Like
      • 95 replies
    • Print Core CC | Red for Ruby
      Q: For some users, abrasive materials may be a new subject matter. Can you explain what it is that makes a material abrasive when you are not sure which print core to use?
      A: Materials which are hard in a solid piece (like metals, ceramics and carbon fibers) will generally also wear down the nozzle. In general one should assume...
        • Like
      • 30 replies
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!