Jump to content
UltiMaker Community of 3D Printing Experts

Concerned about Thingiverse license


Recommended Posts

Posted · Concerned about Thingiverse license

As Ultimaking suggests using Thingiverse as repository I wanted to share the concern of some core developers in the RepRap community. Joseph Prusa even took all his obects and left Thingiverse. He left a notice.

The site license (as of today) says:


3.2 License. You hereby grant, and you represent and warrant that you have the right to grant, to Company and its affiliates and partners, an irrevocable, nonexclusive, royalty-free and fully paid, worldwide license to reproduce, distribute, publicly display and perform, prepare derivative works of, incorporate into other works, and otherwise use your User Content, and to grant sublicenses of the foregoing, solely for the purposes of including your User Content in the Site and Services. You agree to irrevocably waive (and cause to be waived) any claims and assertions of moral rights or attribution with respect to your User Content.

3.3 Secondary License. When you upload User Content to the Site or Services, you will be asked to select a secondary copyright license, which is additional to the license you grant to Company and its affiliates and partners in Section 3.2. This license will govern how other Site or Services users may use your User Content.


Their description in "plain English":


What you’re allowing us to do on the Site: since you own your content, we need your permission to use it in whatever way we see fit on the Site, which is what’s allowed here. Make sure you truly do own it. So foreign law doesn’t complicate what’s already complicated with US Copyright law, you waive “Moral Rights”.


The people argue that Thingiverse can do whatever it wants with your stuff, regardless of the license you selected. Even selling your designs and incorporating them in other projects with other licenses (things that the CC does not allow).

See this thread: http://forums.reprap.org/read.php?1,155484,155484

You can complain by makiing a cube and posting it: http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:30808

I deleted all my desings and wanted to close the account, but unexpectedly, there is no way of doing that. So I contacted support.

The other repositories I found are:


  • [*]



But are not very confident in their licenses either.

What do you think about this? Should we move to other repositories? Especially now that Stratasys has bought Makerbot and Thingiverse.


  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Concerned about Thingiverse license

    I am not a lawyer, but I've spent a lot of time reading technology contracts... :-)

    The fuss about this is almost a year old now, and the terms at issue have been in place even longer. Personally, I do have reservations about the direction of Thingiverse and its relationship with MakerBot and now StrataSys, but I feel like this particular furore is rather overblown.

    The TOS clearly indicate that the license grant is solely for the purpose of including the content in the site. It's a fairly standard practice for these sorts of content sharing site to include this kind of waiver. The clause about Moral Rights is rather more vague, but it's important to realize that Moral Rights (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_rights) are a distinct concept from economic rights in the work, and one that has very limited meaning in US law (which governs the entire operation of Thingiverse). As suggested in the reprap thread linked to in the original post, it does seem to me like a clumsy legalese way of trying to limit the scope of a problem, rather than a deliberate attempt to steal anything.

    The fact that the actual commercial license grant is for a very specific, benign purpose seems to all but eliminate the possibility of Thingiverse having a legal loophole to exploit content without the owner's permission (at least as it relates to this particular part of the agreement).

    I hope they will indeed clarify the terms, and make them more user friendly. I think it's BS to claim that it's 'too difficult' to do so. There's no reason that legally sound agreements can't be written in perfectly understandable English that says what it means, and no more. But at the same time, I don't realistically see a way that they could find a way to interpret these TOS clauses in a way that would exploit contributors. I think they would also be incredibly stupid to try, given that the goodwill of the contributors is what provides the value for the site, and indeed, you might argue, for a huge part of the recent MakerBot acquisition.


  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.3 stable released
        In this stable release, Cura 5.3 achieves yet another huge leap forward in 3D printing thanks to material interlocking! As well as introducing an expanded recommended print settings menu and lots of print quality improvements. Not to mention, a whole bunch of new printer profiles for non-UltiMaker printers!
          • Thanks
          • Like
        • 28 replies
      • Here it is. The new UltiMaker S7
        The UltiMaker S7 is built on the success of the UltiMaker S5 and its design decisions were heavily based on feedback from customers.
        So what’s new?
        The obvious change is the S7’s height. It now includes an integrated Air Manager. This filters the exhaust air of every print and also improves build temperature stability. To further enclose the build chamber the S7 only has one magnetically latched door.
        The build stack has also been completely redesigned. A PEI-coated flexible steel build plate makes a big difference to productivity. Not only do you not need tools to pop a printed part off. But we also don’t recommend using or adhesion structures for UltiMaker materials (except PC, because...it’s PC). Along with that, 4 pins and 25 magnets make it easy to replace the flex plate perfectly – even with one hand.
        The re-engineered print head has an inductive sensor which reduces noise when probing the build plate. This effectively makes it much harder to not achieve a perfect first layer, improving overall print success. We also reversed the front fan direction (fewer plastic hairs, less maintenance), made the print core door magnets stronger, and add a sensor that helps avoid flooding.

        The UltiMaker S7 also includes quality of life improvements:
        Reliable bed tilt compensation (no more thumbscrews) 2.4 and 5 GHz Wi-Fi A 1080p camera (mounted higher for a better view) Compatibility with 280+ Marketplace materials Compatibility with S5 project files (no reslicing needed) And a whole lot more  
        Curious to see the S7 in action?
        We’re hosting a free tech demo on February 7.
        It will be live and you can ask any questions to our CTO, Miguel Calvo.
        Register here for the Webinar
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • UltiMaker Cura Alpha 🎄 Tree Support Spotlight 🎄
        Are you a fan of tree support, but dislike the removal process and the amount of filament it uses? Then we would like to invite you to try this special release of UltiMaker Cura. Brought to you by our special community contributor @thomasrahm
        We generated a special version of Cura 5.2 called 5.3.0 Alpha + Xmas. The only changes we introduced compared to UltiMaker Cura 5.2.1 are those which are needed for the new supports. So keep in mind, this is not a sneak peek for Cura 5.3 (there are some really cool new features coming up) but a spotlight release highlighting this new version of tree supports.  
          • Like
        • 22 replies
    • Create New...