Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
Sign in to follow this  
snowygrouch

Dual extrusion head offset gcode

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I am trying to sort out my dual extrusion, (I am not using Cura to make

the code directly, so please dont tell me to just use Cura).

There are alot of conflicting stories on various websites about how to

do this in the gcode for Marlin.

http://reprap.org/wiki/G-code

This one says:

"Example: G10 P3 X17.8 Y-19.3 Z0.0 R140 S205"

Why is it assigning the printhead as "P" ?? Everything else I have seen always

says you should use "T" ?

Since the head offset cannot (I think) be set in firmware, it must be done

internally in the slicer (like CURA), or by GCODE if you want to use

a different slicer like Kisslicer. I dont always want to use CURA so would be

good to have opinions on currect GCODE syntax.

Also M104 seems to not be working, its still waiting for heatup. Has M104 been

deleted from latest firmware.?

Ideas ?

Regards

C.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In Marlin, G10 is nothing to do with head offsets - it triggers a retraction. (Didn't we have this conversation before? :-) )

The correct code is M218 Ta Xb Yc, where a,b and c are the extruder number and the x and y offsets respectively.

You should then be able to change extruders with T0, T1 etc, and have the print position be correctly offset.

Not sure about M104... I'd assume it should still work as before, but I don't have the latest code in front of me at the moment.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • Ultimaker Cura | a new interface
      We're not only trying to always make Ultimaker Cura better with the usual new features and improvements we build, but we're also trying to make it more pleasant to operate. The interface was the focus for the upcoming release, from which we would already like to present you the first glance. 
        • Like
      • 114 replies
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!