Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
Sign in to follow this  
adam-givon

Using Ultimaker with materials that require high temperature.

Recommended Posts

Dear all,

In the recent months we have done some work concerning using the Ultimaker with materials that require high temperature, as well as trying to do create heating bed in which the heat is distributed more evenly over the surface of the bed.

I was thinking to use it for business purposes, but due to me leaving China I decided to share the information with the community. It might be helpful to some of you.

Generally speaking, we tried to replace the standard heating bed material and the PEEK insulator, which are limited in their temperature ranges with Ceramic materials and Silica glass. The reason for it is, that we think that with the correct modifications to the machine, it might be possible to 3D print with alloys. I didn't try the thing itself, but I think it is worth a try, it might open new fields of applications for these modest printers.

Concerning the heating bed, after experimenting with Silica glass (Mohs 7 hardness, transparent), and seeing that the tolerance of the heat around the surface is too big (Silica glass is not a good heat conductor), we started to use 99% Alumina ceramic board. 99% Alumina has reasonable heat conductivity (not as good as Aluminum, but much better than glass). With our equipment we came to heat distribution of around +/- 4 degrees on most parts of the surfaces, besides the edges.

Alumina 99% is an expensive material, but for high Temperature application like this one it is a good candidate. It is hard, can stand temperatures of up to 1,300 degrees, is quite capable of standing thermal shocks.

Together with the boards, we also made new springs, which are longer and stronger. They can carry the weight of the board and their length makes it easier to adjust the height so the surface is straight, and doesn't have slopes.

We have also changed the PEEK insulator to use ceramic material. The problem here is the connection with Bowden tube, we were worried that the high temperature will melt it. I believe that machines operate in high temperature will not use the tube anyhow.

As a replacement for the PEEK part we chose at first Alumina 99%, but we feel its heat transfer is too high, and you cannot really use it as insulator. We then machined parts from Macor, which is much better insulator. Macor is limited to environments of 800 degrees, but for alloys it should be enough (melting point for many alloys is around 650 degrees or less). One advantage of Macor is that it can be machined to keep very demanding mechanical tolerances. It can fit will with a machine, and the fact you can machine it, can save initial investments on molds etc.

Of course, when users will start operate in these temperature, the small aluminum block connecting the nozzle and the PEEK part will have to be replaced with a material that can stand the higher temperature, probably bronze.

As I wrote earlier, we also created silicon heating pad with a new pattern of the heating lines. It is not rocket science, but still, it required some experimenting, and we found it to keep very nice balance over the heated surface. For those of you who are interested, please email me and I will send a photo of the layout. We saw that feeding it with 300W, heating was fast and consistent.

I hope some of you will find this entry helpful, and naturally, if you need further information, please let me know.

Adam.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Im glad someone is showing that MACOR is the way of the future for the insulator.

I have been banging on about that for ages without much luck...

However I am not at all sure what you are trying to suggest about printing "alloys".

You cannot print Aluminium in this way because it oxidises instantly on contact with air and so

would need an inert gas shield.

Printing lower temp "metals" like solder is a no-no because you will either die of lead poisoning

or get very ill from the flux in non-leaded solder (which is actually in the short term even worse for you

then lead is).

Also printing anything above the autoignition point of the materials that make up the body of the machine is

totally disasterous in principle.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Thanks for the input.

It is a new field for me, and it was clear when we started that there is much to learn. However, plastic is injectable, and so are the materials used in die cast process. I was thinking about trying out these materials (the ones used in die cast or similar) for 3D printing.

I also think that if it can be done, using the cheap machine for these kind of applications will be quite amazing. I think it is worth the research, especially when you consider that the other machines used in this field cost hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Greetings,

Adam.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

×

Important Information

Terms of Use Privacy Policy