Thanks for the advice gr5.
I did some more testing on one of my machines yesterday. I basically performed a modified melt flow index type test to find out how much material the extruder was able to push through the nozzle before it started to kick back and skip steps. TLDR, with a 0.4mm nozzle I'm only able to push about 2-3 mm^3/s through my machine before seeing issues.
My test protocol was as follows:
Machine Setup:
- UM2 Extended
- Stock black extruder
- Olsson Block w/ 0.4mm E3D nozzle
- Test temperature range 190-260'C in 10'C increments.
- ~4m long free piece of filament removed from the spool.
- Machine heated to 240C when new filament was loaded and 60mm of filament was extruded to clear residue from previous test.
- Pronterface was used to send extrusion commands and control machine temp.
Testing:
1. Heat machine to test temperature and wait 1 min for equilibrium.
2. Extrude 20 mm of filament at specified rate (starting at 10mm/s).
- If extruder clicks reduce extrusion speed by 5 mm/s and retest.
- If extruder does not click, increase extrusion speed by 5 mm/s and retest.
On to the results!
A couple of interesting points:
- I had one old role of Gizomodorks black PLA that had really high results compared to all other spools of PLA I tested, so I reset the machine and verified the numbers, which were repeatable. Interestingly, this role old/brittle and was saturated with water to the point where it visibly steamed while coming out of the nozzle. I may try and stick in the oven to dry it and retest to see if the higher flow rates are due to moisture content.
- The Matterhackers PETG showing signs of under extrusion when printing walls is what kicked off this whole thing and it actually had really good maximum flow results compared to any of the PLA samples I tested. I saw under extrusion on inside perimeters at 60 mm/s print speed which only equates to about 5 mm^3/s of required flow, and the required flow value is less than half of what my test result showed at 245C. Based on that metric it looks like under extrusion starts to show up way earlier than when the extruder will kick back due to excess feed pressure.
- My data appears to be consistent with gr5's recommended print speeds for PLA (actually they may even be optimistic in my case).
So, it looks like I need to upgrade the extruder on my machines and significantly lower my expectations regarding print speeds.
Edited by kaledly- 1
Recommended Posts
gr5 2,230
I totally agree with your power assessment. If the temperature is within 5C of the goal temp then you don't need a more powerful heater.
I think you just have typical UM2. At 0.2 layer you shouldn't be going over 30mm/sec and 60mm/sec is the absolute fastest speed at 210C for a typicall, well running UM2 with the old feeder. Faster than 60mm/sec and it will start clicking.
I do recommend you upgrade the feeders but it's not mandatory. You have several options:
1) Get the $400 kit
2) Get a knock off copy kit from china at under $100. on aliexpress.
3) You can do a meduza upgrade for $19 (and around an hours work typically for each printer)
I sell the Meduza kit in my store thegr5store.com
It involves printing some parts. It's definitely more work than doing the "plus" kit. All the instructions are on my website at gr5.org/med/
Here is my table of how fast a UM2 can print:
Here are top recommended speeds for .2mm layers (twice as fast for .1mm layers) and .4mm nozzle:
20mm/sec at 200C
30mm/sec at 210C
40mm/sec at 225C
50mm/sec at 240C
The printer can do double these speeds but with huge difficulty and usually with a loss in part quality due to underextrusion.
You also might want to keep the petg on one arbitrary printer and the pla on the other. The nylon degrades faster at 230C versus 210C and petg (and abs) can put up with the degradation better (I have no idea why).
Link to post
Share on other sites