UltiMaker uses functional, analytical and tracking cookies. Tracking cookies enhance your experience on our website and may also collect your personal data outside of Ultimaker websites. If you agree with the use of tracking cookies, click “I agree, continue browsing”. You can withdraw your consent at any time. If you do not consent with the use of tracking cookies, click “Refuse”. You can find more information about cookies on our Privacy and Cookie Policy page.
Cura 4.8.0 running extremely slowly with multiple models
Posted
· Cura 4.8.0 running extremely slowly with multiple models
I split a "letters" thing using mesh tools
28 items on the plate
locked up a gigabyte gaming laptop I just bought because it ran slow adding support blocks on my old embedded graphics machine. about 8~12 sec per execution with that load.
dunno if that is normal or not
but Its very reproducible, so I'm sure the devs are aware
Link to post
Share on other sites
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Here comes Cura 5.9 and in this stable release we have lots of material and printer profiles for UltiMaker printers, including the newly released Sketch Sprint. Additionally, scarf seams have been introduced alongside even more print settings and improvements. Check out the rest of this article to find out the details on all of that and more
We are happy to announce the next evolution in the UltiMaker 3D printer lineup: the UltiMaker Factor 4 industrial-grade 3D printer, designed to take manufacturing to new levels of efficiency and reliability. Factor 4 is an end-to-end 3D printing solution for light industrial applications
Recommended Posts
meicalnissyen 0
I split a "letters" thing using mesh tools
28 items on the plate
locked up a gigabyte gaming laptop I just bought because it ran slow adding support blocks on my old embedded graphics machine. about 8~12 sec per execution with that load.
dunno if that is normal or not
but Its very reproducible, so I'm sure the devs are aware
Link to post
Share on other sites