UltiMaker uses functional, analytical and tracking cookies. Tracking cookies enhance your experience on our website and may also collect your personal data outside of Ultimaker websites. If you agree with the use of tracking cookies, click “I agree, continue browsing”. You can withdraw your consent at any time. If you do not consent with the use of tracking cookies, click “Refuse”. You can find more information about cookies on our Privacy and Cookie Policy page.
Consider a basic calibration cube. It has 12 edges where one face meets an adjacent face. There should be no gaps in those edges. If there was a gap then if you tried too fill the cube with water it would run out onto the floor. The model isn't watertight (also called non-manifold).
When a slicer goes through the model it needs to know where the inside is and where the outside is. That gap in a seam allows the slicer to move along the wall on the outside and keep going through the gap instead of onto the outside of the adjacent face. Now the slicer is on the inside but doesn't know it. That's when all the confusion jumps up and the slicing goes wrong. That's why the warning comes up.
Even a "Respected Designer" is at the mercy of the software utility that converts a CAD model into an STL/OBJ/3mf file for use in the slicer. Designers themselves can put a model together incorrectly and cause problems during the export to STL.
Cura has some basic STL repair functions (if the Mesh Tools plugin is loaded from the MarketPlace). MS 3D Builder (in Windows) and Fusion 360 have decent repair tools as do some on-line sites (I've been using THIS ONE and it's pretty good. I like the report it generates on what was wrong with the model.)
A pretty fair percentage of the problems attributed to Cura both here and on the Ultimaker Github site are actually problems with the models. Of those problem models only a tiny percentage cannot be repaired without going back and fixing them in the CAD software. That FormWare site I mentioned fixed one model that had 36,000 errors. In that particular case I think magic was involved.
Link to post
Share on other sites
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
🚀 Help Shape the Future of Cura and Digital Factory – Join Our Power User Research Program!
We’re looking for active users of Cura and Digital Factory — across professional and educational use cases — to help us improve the next generation of our tools.
Our Power User Research Program kicks off with a quick 15-minute interview to learn about your setup and workflows. If selected, you’ll be invited into a small group of users who get early access to features and help us shape the future of 3D printing software.
🧪 What to Expect:
A short 15-minute kickoff interview to help us get to know you If selected, bi-monthly research sessions (15–30 minutes) where we’ll test features, review workflows, or gather feedback Occasional invites to try out early prototypes or vote on upcoming improvements
🎁 What You’ll Get:
Selected participants receive a free 1-year Studio or Classroom license Early access to new features and tools A direct voice in what we build next
👉 Interested? Please fill out this quick form
Your feedback helps us make Cura Cloud more powerful, more intuitive, and more aligned with how you actually print and manage your workflow.
Thanks for being part of the community,
The full stable release of Cura 5.10 has arrived, and it brings support for the new Ultimaker S8, as well as new materials and profiles for previously supported UltiMaker printers. Additionally, you can now control your models in Cura using a 3D SpaceMouse and more!
Recommended Posts
GregValiant 1,492
Consider a basic calibration cube. It has 12 edges where one face meets an adjacent face. There should be no gaps in those edges. If there was a gap then if you tried too fill the cube with water it would run out onto the floor. The model isn't watertight (also called non-manifold).
When a slicer goes through the model it needs to know where the inside is and where the outside is. That gap in a seam allows the slicer to move along the wall on the outside and keep going through the gap instead of onto the outside of the adjacent face. Now the slicer is on the inside but doesn't know it. That's when all the confusion jumps up and the slicing goes wrong. That's why the warning comes up.
Even a "Respected Designer" is at the mercy of the software utility that converts a CAD model into an STL/OBJ/3mf file for use in the slicer. Designers themselves can put a model together incorrectly and cause problems during the export to STL.
Cura has some basic STL repair functions (if the Mesh Tools plugin is loaded from the MarketPlace). MS 3D Builder (in Windows) and Fusion 360 have decent repair tools as do some on-line sites (I've been using THIS ONE and it's pretty good. I like the report it generates on what was wrong with the model.)
A pretty fair percentage of the problems attributed to Cura both here and on the Ultimaker Github site are actually problems with the models. Of those problem models only a tiny percentage cannot be repaired without going back and fixing them in the CAD software. That FormWare site I mentioned fixed one model that had 36,000 errors. In that particular case I think magic was involved.
Link to post
Share on other sites