UltiMaker uses functional, analytical and tracking cookies. Tracking cookies enhance your experience on our website and may also collect your personal data outside of Ultimaker websites. If you agree with the use of tracking cookies, click “I agree, continue browsing”. You can withdraw your consent at any time. If you do not consent with the use of tracking cookies, click “Refuse”. You can find more information about cookies on our Privacy and Cookie Policy page.
x/y seems to be off, but I'm not hearing any skipped steps
Posted
· x/y seems to be off, but I'm not hearing any skipped steps
Those holes are partly created by underextrusion which you can fix by printing a little hotter or a little slower (e.g. 50mm/sec .2mm layers 240C should be fine) or you can try tightening the screw on the feeder. My spring is compressed down to 11mm if that helps although I think that isn't helpful as the feeder design has changed a bit I think and it might not be the same spring.
ALSO I agree that you have some X/Y error. It's caused by "backlash" also known as "play". Backlash can be caused by loose belts or very high friction. In the case of loose belts, the head never moves as far as the stepper commands it in either X, Y or both. In the case of high friction, the head also never moves as far as commanded because even though the belt is tight the head doesn't move that last .2mm because static friction holds it in place.
So push the head around in X and Y. If you push with the side blocks you should be able to push the head with one finger on each side block. X and Y friction should be similar. Put some oil on all 6 of the rods in the gantry system. Any light oil will do. More likely though the problem is the belts are too loose. Start with the X and Y short belts. Push the motors down quite firmly. The longer belts are trickier to tighten. I recommend using the metal part of a clothes pin and using that to tighten the long belts. Google it. More info about the relationship of loose belts to print quality results here (posts #7 and #8 - look at picture in post 7 and read the text connected to that photo - you have to click on the photo first and then the phenomenon is explained better in post #8):
In this stable release, Cura 5.3 achieves yet another huge leap forward in 3D printing thanks to material interlocking! As well as introducing an expanded recommended print settings menu and lots of print quality improvements. Not to mention, a whole bunch of new printer profiles for non-UltiMaker printers!
The UltiMaker S7 is built on the success of the UltiMaker S5 and its design decisions were heavily based on feedback from customers.
So what’s new?
The obvious change is the S7’s height. It now includes an integrated Air Manager. This filters the exhaust air of every print and also improves build temperature stability. To further enclose the build chamber the S7 only has one magnetically latched door.
The build stack has also been completely redesigned. A PEI-coated flexible steel build plate makes a big difference to productivity. Not only do you not need tools to pop a printed part off. But we also don’t recommend using or adhesion structures for UltiMaker materials (except PC, because...it’s PC). Along with that, 4 pins and 25 magnets make it easy to replace the flex plate perfectly – even with one hand.
The re-engineered print head has an inductive sensor which reduces noise when probing the build plate. This effectively makes it much harder to not achieve a perfect first layer, improving overall print success. We also reversed the front fan direction (fewer plastic hairs, less maintenance), made the print core door magnets stronger, and add a sensor that helps avoid flooding.
The UltiMaker S7 also includes quality of life improvements:
Reliable bed tilt compensation (no more thumbscrews) 2.4 and 5 GHz Wi-Fi A 1080p camera (mounted higher for a better view) Compatibility with 280+ Marketplace materials Compatibility with S5 project files (no reslicing needed) And a whole lot more
Curious to see the S7 in action?
We’re hosting a free tech demo on February 7.
It will be live and you can ask any questions to our CTO, Miguel Calvo.
Register here for the Webinar
Are you a fan of tree support, but dislike the removal process and the amount of filament it uses? Then we would like to invite you to try this special release of UltiMaker Cura. Brought to you by our special community contributor @thomasrahm
We generated a special version of Cura 5.2 called 5.3.0 Alpha + Xmas. The only changes we introduced compared to UltiMaker Cura 5.2.1 are those which are needed for the new supports. So keep in mind, this is not a sneak peek for Cura 5.3 (there are some really cool new features coming up) but a spotlight release highlighting this new version of tree supports.
Recommended Posts
gr5 2,005
Those holes are partly created by underextrusion which you can fix by printing a little hotter or a little slower (e.g. 50mm/sec .2mm layers 240C should be fine) or you can try tightening the screw on the feeder. My spring is compressed down to 11mm if that helps although I think that isn't helpful as the feeder design has changed a bit I think and it might not be the same spring.
ALSO I agree that you have some X/Y error. It's caused by "backlash" also known as "play". Backlash can be caused by loose belts or very high friction. In the case of loose belts, the head never moves as far as the stepper commands it in either X, Y or both. In the case of high friction, the head also never moves as far as commanded because even though the belt is tight the head doesn't move that last .2mm because static friction holds it in place.
So push the head around in X and Y. If you push with the side blocks you should be able to push the head with one finger on each side block. X and Y friction should be similar. Put some oil on all 6 of the rods in the gantry system. Any light oil will do. More likely though the problem is the belts are too loose. Start with the X and Y short belts. Push the motors down quite firmly. The longer belts are trickier to tighten. I recommend using the metal part of a clothes pin and using that to tighten the long belts. Google it. More info about the relationship of loose belts to print quality results here (posts #7 and #8 - look at picture in post 7 and read the text connected to that photo - you have to click on the photo first and then the phenomenon is explained better in post #8):
http://umforum.ultimaker.com/index.php?/topic/1872-some-calibration-photographs/?p=14396
Link to post
Share on other sites