Jump to content

UM too old for Marlin?


hp-65

Recommended Posts

Posted · UM too old for Marlin?

Hi all,

I bought my UM around 9/2011.

Until now, I never used anything else but 0025 with 5D FW,

and I never had any problems.

Recent tries to upgrade to 0035 or Cura failed due to some,

yet unknown, incompatibilities with the Marlin firmware.

As soon as Marlin is loaded, nothing further happens...

Where can I find a description or history of the UM hardware?

Do I need any new electronics or can I build a Marlin compatible

version for my old stuff?

thx

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · UM too old for Marlin?

    Can you check if you have an Arduino Mega 2560, or an old Arduino Mega?

    Also, check if you have 1.5.4 electronics or older. (It's on the green PCB, near the On/Off switch)

    See the difference:

    http://arduino.cc/en/Main/ArduinoBoardMega

    http://arduino.cc/en/Main/ArduinoBoardMega2560

    New machines are shipped with the 2560, but a few old machines have the older Arduino, causing the Cura updater to fail.

    A few old machines are also shipped with 1.3 electronics, which require different settings to work.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · UM too old for Marlin?

    Hi Daid,

    What settings are required for older electronics? What are the known symptoms of running marlin on the unsupported hardware? I know I have the Mega2550 Arduino and I believe I have the 1.5.4 electronics, but I have had issues with the newest firmware myself. I've not posted about it before because I just haven't had time to collect appropriate details and experiment...

    Basically, I'm running a very old 'experimental' build of Marlin built by Bernhard Kubicek around October or November of last year. It works great, but I've tried a few times to update to a current version of Marlin and every time I end up going back to the old build. I currently print at an extrusion temperature of 175 with this firmware, but on the newer Marlin I cannot get any extrusion at all below about 220 degrees. And I don't get consistent flow and layers that stick together under 240 degrees. Even at 240 as soon as I try to take the object off the platform it just de-laminates and basically crumbles. I also get bowden tube plugs when trying to print with the new Marlin firmware at these high temps, but have no problem with them on the old experimental build... Is it possible that my temp is reading way off on the new one? Is there a setting somewhere for the thermocouple raw value to temperature mapping?

    Thanks,

    Troy.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · UM too old for Marlin?

    If you try to install the wrong Marlin on a Mega (instead of a Mega2560) it will not work, but Cura's updater will fail before that, as it only supports the Mega2560. If you install Marlin on older electronics, it will most likely start, but fail to do anything as the pin settings are wrong. But there are very few 1.3 electronics boards out there. Most run 1.5.4 and new machines get 1.5.6 (which are compatible with each other)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · UM too old for Marlin?
    but Cura's updater will fail before that, as it only supports the Mega2560.

    If this is true, my board is a Mega2560, because I used Cura to update the FW to Marlin, but

    it refused to program it back to 5D. I had to use 0025...

    I will open the machine and take a look inside, when I'm back home...

    Are there any additional, external HW changes?

    Temperature sensor, inverted end switches or anything else that could

    interfere here?

     

    But there are very few 1.3 electronics boards out there. Most run 1.5.4 and new machines get 1.5.6 (which are compatible with each other)

    I am pretty sure my board is 1.5.4...

    I found schematics of 1.5.3 and 1.5.4. The only differences are the fan connectors and minor

    layout changes around the screw terminals.

    Where can I find the docs for 1.5.6 (or 1.5.5)?

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · UM too old for Marlin?

    There are no hardware changes that I know off that causes incompatibilities, except for the 1.3 electronics. You could try the firmware from Cura RC4, I am getting some strange reports from the Cura 12.07 firmware from other people...

    Electronics 1.5.5 was never released. The 1.5.6 schematics are on thingiverse.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · UM too old for Marlin?

    I disassembled it and found:

    - Mega 2560

    - UM PCB rev. 1.5.4

    As far as I understood, this should work with Marlin, but it doesn't...

    I really would appreciate any help or hints on this!

    I am getting some strange reports from the Cura 12.07 firmware from other people...

    What do they report?

    Minor issues like bad printing results or real blockers, like "nothing is working",

    like here?

    But as I already wrote, this is not (only) related to Cura.

    0035 (with Marlin) does exactly the same:

    Absolutely nothing...

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · UM too old for Marlin?

    A little late, but maybe this is of interest for others, who have

    comparable issues (though this is somehow unlikely ;-) )

    I wrote some test programs and discovered some defective

    SRAM cells. I replaced the MCU and made a tiny step forward:

    At least I was able to connect to the machine, control X, Y, Z,

    the heater and everything else, except for the extruder.

    I hooked up a scope and found out that the extruder was operated

    at a ridiculous low speed, only a few ticks per second (on fastest

    extrusion settings).

    After browsing the source code, I found the magic and undocumented

    modal code M92.

    BTW, stuff like this is really brilliant >8-(

     

               if(value < 20.0) {             float factor = axis_steps_per_unit[i] / value; // increase e constants if M92 E14 is given for netfab.             max_e_jerk *= factor;             max_feedrate[i] *= factor;             axis_steps_per_sqr_second[i] *= factor;           }

     

    Adding a

    M92 E865.888

    which I read in a post somewhere else, feels like the extruder is

    running with the right speed, but at this point a lot of other problems popped up.

    (E865.888 is a ridiculous value, at least regarding the physical tolerances

    of an extruder).

    Until now, I wasn't able to print with with 0040 or Cura.

    Maybe only a few or more steps forward...

    ;-)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.7 stable released
        Cura 5.7 is here and it brings a handy new workflow improvement when using Thingiverse and Cura together, as well as additional capabilities for Method series printers, and a powerful way of sharing print settings using new printer-agnostic project files! Read on to find out about all of these improvements and more. 
         
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
        • 0 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...