CSharp

Wow, I had no idea about these differences in the calculation of flows between the various slicers. I did the test you suggested with the flow at 110%, I would say that I no longer have problems with the loops detaching and in the top you can't see the layer underneath. I will try with intermediate values between 100 and 110 to see which is the best because the dimensional accuracy is a little worse but I will compensate in another way. To report this change in my profiles I have to set all the parameters relating to the flow in the material sheet to 110, right? Should I leave the "Flow Rate Compensation Factor" parameter in the Experimental tab at 100%? Thanks for the tips

And what do you suggest changing in the print profile? The filament size is correct. The nozzle size is correct. The wall ordering is "Inside to Outside". The temperature is correct (and using Simplify 3D with the same temperature I have no problems) With the THIN WALL TEST I have a correct result. I attach the profile I am using MyDraftProfile.curaprofile

Great job, can you also share some print profiles you use?

Good morning everyone, I recently (and with satisfaction!!) switched from Simplify 3D to Cura but I have a problem that I can't solve and it's what you see in the photos, it seems that the internal perimeter of the holes is detaching. Using Simplify I don't have this problem so the problem must be some parameter of the slicer but I don't know which one. My printer is a Sharebot Viper (i.e. a rebranded FLASHFORGE GUIDER IIS..). Do you have any ideas? Thank you

Buongiorno a tutti, Sono recentemente (e con soddisfazione!!) passato da Simplify 3D a Cura però ho un problema che non riesco a risolvere ed è quello che vedete nelle foto, sembra che il perimetro interno dei fori si stacchi. Usando Simplify questo problema non ce l'ho quindi deve essere qualche parametro dello slicer il problema ma non saprei quale. La mia stampante è una Sharebot Viper (ovvero una FLASHFORGE GUIDER IIS rimarchiata..). Avete qualche idea? Grazie