Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
jweaver

Cura 2.3.1 and Printerbot shows objects below the bed

Recommended Posts

I adore CURA 15.x, but I decided its time to have a good look at the "new" Cura.

I installed 2.3.1 and was happy to see the option for the Printrbot Simple...

But when I load an object, the bottom few millimeters appears inside a layer of "fog"... Like the object is under the bed...

Moving the view around, it looks like the Printerbot bed is rendered accuratly (Which is nice), but the print surface is under the bed...

So I am pretty sure its just a visual thing and it won't affecting slicing/printing.. But its annoying.. Has anyone else noticed this? And is there a solution? (perhaps a way to remove the rendered image of the Printrbot bed?)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can change the location of the rendered bed by adjusting the "platform_offset" variable in the .def.json file.

 

Cheers for that.. I checked the "printrbot_simple.def.json" and there is no "platform_offset" variable.. But I checked another json file and can see the syntax.. So I added it to the Printrbot json and now I can't see Printrbot in the list.

There must be something about the syntax that I don't understand. I changed this:

"metadata": {

"visible": true,

"author": "Calvindog717",

"manufacturer": "PrintrBot",

"category": "Other",

"platform": "printrbot_simple_metal_platform.stl",

"file_formats": "text/x-gcode"

},

to this:

"metadata": {

"visible": true,

"author": "Calvindog717",

"manufacturer": "PrintrBot",

"category": "Other",

"platform": "printrbot_simple_metal_platform.stl",

"file_formats": "text/x-gcode",

"platform_offset": [0, 0, 0],

},

Any ideas?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do

one superfluous comma at the end of the line...

You can validate json structs here: http://jsonlint.com/

 

Doh.. I am officially an idiot.. I corrected several syntax errors and typos.. But I completely overlooked that comma.

Its working now and for anyone who is interested, the correct values for the Printrbot are:

"file_formats": "text/x-gcode",

"platform_offset": [0, -3, 0]

},

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • Taking Advantage of DfAM
      This is a statement that’s often made about AM/3DP. I'll focus on the way DfAM can take advantage of some of the unique capabilities that AM and 3DP have to offer. I personally think that the use of AM/3DP for light-weighting is one of it’s most exciting possibilities and one that could play a key part in the sustainability of design and manufacturing in the future.
        • Like
      • 3 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!