Jump to content

Cura 2.4 and Cura 2.5 Beta slow?


melbo

Recommended Posts

Posted · Cura 2.4 and Cura 2.5 Beta slow?

Hi community,

Not sure if someone else experience the same but Cura 2.4 and Cura 2.5 Beta are super slow on my MacBook Pro 2.2 GHz, 16GB. CPU almost 100% all the time. Any thoughts about it? Would really appreciate it. I used other slicing software before and none of them where so CPU intense like this one.

Best,

Mel

5a3333fbd552d_ScreenShot2017-04-05at2_10_03PM.png.dff666d24e60e6470dec16d8b15a4281.png

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Cura 2.4 and Cura 2.5 Beta slow?

    Slicing is multi threaded these days. This means that it will use more resources if there are any.

    If you don't want Cura to use that much resources, disable auto slicing. If more people feel this way, we could also add a force single threaded option, but that would significantly increase slicing time (~ 2x as slow)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Cura 2.4 and Cura 2.5 Beta slow?

    On my Mac Cura 2.4 does not behave weirdly. CPU consumption is normal or else I'd hear it when the spin up.

    Sometimes they do but only for very complex models.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Cura 2.4 and Cura 2.5 Beta slow?

    Ive found Cura to work really really slow on desktop imac (16GB ram, latest os), it works a bit better on my macbook pro (also 16GB ram)....

    turning off auto slice does help, but really on the imac its pretty much unusable.

    S3D is a good alternative slicing software if your on the look-out, it costs $150, but if your going to be doing alot of printing I think it's worth investing in.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Cura 2.4 and Cura 2.5 Beta slow?

    Cura 2.5 is slower for me than the versions before. Mostly after switching to the layer view and back again.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Cura 2.4 and Cura 2.5 Beta slow?

    Slicing is multi threaded these days. This means that it will use more resources if there are any.

    If you don't want Cura to use that much resources, disable auto slicing. If more people feel this way, we could also add a force single threaded option, but that would significantly increase slicing time (~ 2x as slow)

    Perhaps the "force single threaded option" as you have suggested, isn't a bad idea. It appears that multi threading has introduced other anomalies into the slicing process, such as not knowing where Cura knows where it left off on the previous layer

    From a previous post in April by bagel-orb:

    Cura 2.5 definitely handles positioning differently from 2.4. Since Cura 2.5, CuraEngine is using multi-threading to speed up the process. The engine generates multiple layers at the same time. The major disadvantage of this is that the engine doesn't know where the previous layer ended in order to get the point on the inner walls closest to the previous print head location. Instead the engine starts each layer closest to the Layer Start Location.

    In addition, I've also experience some strange behavior with support placement in 2.5. Placing support where it is not needed. That's why I continue to use 2.4 for daily production work on my UM3 machines.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
      • Ultimaker Cura 5.6 stable released
        Cura now supports Method series printers!
         
        A year after the merger of Ultimaker and MakerBotQQ, we have unlocked the ability for users of our Method series printers to slice files using UltiMaker Cura. As of this release, users can find profiles for our Method and Method XL printers, as well as material profiles for ABS-R, ABS-CF, and RapidRinse. Meaning it’s now possible to use either Cura or the existing cloud-slicing software CloudPrint when printing with these printers or materials
        • 48 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...