Jump to content

Cura 3.0.3 did not generate supports


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited) · Cura 3.0.3 did not generate supports

Very interesting situation.  Using Cura 3.0.3, following my normal "workflow sequence" that has functioned correctly prior to this incident. Dragged and dropped an STL on the stage, did some manipulation, etc.  Operating in the "Recommended" dialog (not "Custom").  Clicked the "Generate Supports" box.  Let it slice.  Saved the file.  Printed it.

No supports.  Wasted several hours...

I would assume I forgot to check the supports box, or did something else wrong, except, if you "import" the Gcode file into the profile manager, Cura shows the correct selections to generate supports.  However, there are no supports in the Gcode.

Same thing phrased another way for clarity:  The comments at the end of the Gcode show "Generate Supports" ON.  There are no supports in the actual Gcode itself.  Look in layer mode; they are not there.

Incorrect Gcode file, and a later generated good file, are available.  I don't immediately see how to attach files in this forum; perhaps I am too new.



Edited by Guest
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · Cura 3.0.3 did not generate supports

    Hi and welcome,

    You can check the layer view to see if the supports are generated as intended, it's a good practice to always check the layer view before actually printing to avoid obvious problems

    Regarding your issue, it's a bit complicated to help, i would assume that maybe the support angle was not correct? In normal view the places where support are needed are identified in red.

    To upload pictures, you can go on your name (top right) and select albums, there you can upload pictures, then in a forum post you can add pictures from your albums by clicking on the image gallery icon in the editor

    Edited by Guest
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · Cura 3.0.3 did not generate supports

    Agreed that checking for supports, and other features, in layer view, is best practice.   At the same time, "trusting" the software to turn on/off a basic feature, that is something that should NOT need end-user verification.

    Regarding the possibility of changes of angle: The angles did not change. The sequence was literally:  Open an STL, check the 'supports' box, get Gcode that says it has supports (says so in the ;SETTINGS_3 comments) but does not.  EXACT same STL, a day later, check the box, and supports are generated.  No changes to angles in the STL, no changes to the configuration in Cura.

    Absolute proof it is not the angles:

    A "diff" of the Gcode files shows the moves generated to print the part are identical (other than the absolute extruder values).  Of course, there are a bunch of extra moves in the file with supports.  

    First, remove E extruder moves from both files because they will always be different, being absolute.
    >sed -n "s/E[[:digit:]].*//;p"  < "AKL_Table Corners to hold  Reflow Oven - Front v2 - Supports.gcode" > tmp1.txt
    >sed -n "s/E[[:digit:]].*//;p"  <"AKL_Table Corners to hold Reflow Oven - Front v2.gcode" > tmp2.txt

    Then, get line counts of each file, and of matching lines
    >wc -l tmp1.txt
    111152 tmp1.txt
    >wc -l tmp2.txt
    97110 tmp2.txt

    Then, get line count of matching lines
    >awk "NR==FNR{a[$1]++;next} a[$1]" tmp1.txt tmp2.txt | wc -l

    As you can see, of the 97,110 lines of Gcode in the file that was supposed to have supports, 96,899 of them are identical to the file that actually does have the supports.  These are the moves that make the object itself.

    This is easily verified by extracting just those lines:

    awk "NR==FNR{a[$1]++;next} a[$1]" tmp1.txt tmp2.txt > tmp3.gcode

    and loading them in Cura itself.  The objects appear.

    Summary:  Cura recorded in the ;Setting_3 lines in a Gcode file that it generated supports; however, it did not. Re-Running with identical settings and STL generated supports.  "Identical" can be verified with utilities, such as 'diff'.



    Verification the settings are identical:
    >grep SETTINGS_3 "AKL_Table Corners to hold Reflow Oven - Front v2 - Supports.gcode" > cfg1.txt
    >grep SETTINGS_3 "AKL_Table Corners to hold Reflow Oven - Front v2.gcode" > cfg2.txt
    >diff -s cfg1.txt cfg1.txt
    Files cfg1.txt and cfg1.txt are identical

    Edited by Guest
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • Introducing the UltiMaker Factor 4
        We are happy to announce the next evolution in the UltiMaker 3D printer lineup: the UltiMaker Factor 4 industrial-grade 3D printer, designed to take manufacturing to new levels of efficiency and reliability. Factor 4 is an end-to-end 3D printing solution for light industrial applications
          • Thanks
          • Like
        • 3 replies
      • UltiMaker Cura 5.7 stable released
        Cura 5.7 is here and it brings a handy new workflow improvement when using Thingiverse and Cura together, as well as additional capabilities for Method series printers, and a powerful way of sharing print settings using new printer-agnostic project files! Read on to find out about all of these improvements and more. 
          • Like
        • 26 replies
    • Create New...