Jump to content

box hollowed out in model vs. not


grue

Recommended Posts

Posted · box hollowed out in model vs. not

so i've been playing with a small building - basically the shape of a box with some ins & outs where windows would be, but nothing really detailed as i'm doing this for comparisons.

 

1. i modeled the building with the 4 wallls, but ZERO thickness to the walls. (i'll call this "solid walls")

  • in cura i turned off top/bottom - set top/bottom thickness to 0.0mm
  • i turned off infill
  • i set my wall thickness to a multiple of my nozzle dia, 4.0mm
  • i think this is more or less vase mode?

 

2. i modeled the building with 5mm thick walls. (i'll call this "hollow walls")

  • in cura i turned off top/bottom - set top/bottom thickness to 0.0mm
  • i turned infil on and set to 10%
  • i set my wall thickness to 0.8mm - so this gives me two lines for outer wall and two lines for inner wall with void in-between which is filled with infill

 

i never thought about it to this point, but wow what a difference in estimated print time & material usage

 

the infilled walls (hollow) model is showing 18.25hrs vs. 14.3hrs for "solid" walls and 22.53m of material vs. 44.85m!

 

overall both models are roughly 91mm (w) x 91mm (d) x 78mm (h)

 

you really have to think these things through!

 

one concern might be how thick would walls have to be for some amount of structural integrity. in the case of #1 above, would 4mm thickness be enough for something up to 12inches or 15inches tall? etc etc...

solid walls.jpg

hollow walls.jpg

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    • 2 weeks later...
    Posted · box hollowed out in model vs. not

    Thicker walls with the infill and lots of air in there is much stronger than thinner walls that are solid.  Having said that the model in the upper photo is probably plenty strong but you'll just have to test it and find out for yourself.  In fact you could probably cut the infill in half roughly.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
      • Ultimaker Cura 5.6 stable released
        Cura now supports Method series printers!
         
        A year after the merger of Ultimaker and MakerBotQQ, we have unlocked the ability for users of our Method series printers to slice files using UltiMaker Cura. As of this release, users can find profiles for our Method and Method XL printers, as well as material profiles for ABS-R, ABS-CF, and RapidRinse. Meaning it’s now possible to use either Cura or the existing cloud-slicing software CloudPrint when printing with these printers or materials
        • 48 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...