Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts

Cura generated temperature commands are ordered incorrectly

Recommended Posts


On 6/21/2017 at 2:56 AM, ahoeben said:

CuraEngine checks if the start gcode contains commands to heat up the hotend and bed before the print is started. If the start gcode does not have command to do that, CuraEngine adds the three lines (M190, M104, M109) before your start gcode just to make sure that the hotend is not cold before starting the actual print.

If you don't want Cura to add these lines, make sure your start gcode contains lines which have {material_print_temperature} and {material_bed_temperature} in them respectively.


The order of these three lines is incorrect. An M104 (heat hotend, no wait) followed immediately with an M109 (heat hotend, wait) is exactly the same as the M109 alone (i.e. the M104 is essentially a no-op). If however, the M104 was first followed by the M190 (heat bed and wait) and then the M109, then that combination would cause both heaters to be working at the same time.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 6/8/2018 at 10:02 AM, smartavionics said:

Maybe their logic is the following: as some beds take a lot longer to heat than hot ends, the ordering is OK as it minimises the amount of time that the filament is static in a hot nozzle while waiting for the bed to heat.


This might make sense if there were just the two commands, M109 followed by M190. Since there are three commands...

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • Ultimaker Cura | a new interface
      We're not only trying to always make Ultimaker Cura better with the usual new features and improvements we build, but we're also trying to make it more pleasant to operate. The interface was the focus for the upcoming release, from which we would already like to present you the first glance. 
        • Like
      • 24 replies
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!