Jump to content

Can "Initial Layer Flow" be used for adhesion? (it seems so)


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited) · Can "Initial Layer Flow" be used for adhesion? (it seems so)

Hi everyone, I'm new here. I have seen that Cura has a feature to set the flow of the first layer. Of course it's set by default to 100%, however I wonder if tweaking it to maybe 101% or 102% can make a more succesful first layer, because in theory, increasing it just a bit should remove those gaps in the first layer you often see when the nozzle is a bit too high from the bed.


What do you guys think?

Edited by Neukyhm
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Can "Initial Layer Flow" be used for adhesion? (it seems so)

    200% would be more reasonable.  You want to squish the first layer quite a bit.  There are MANY ways to achieve this and I don't know which method is most common but I think it's by lying about the Z calibration.  Let me explain.


    I'm going to explain with Ultimaker but it's the same idea for any printer.


    Normally if Z=0 the nozzle is just barely, perfectly touching the bed everywhere.  The first layer in cura is typically 0.3mm (or 0.27mm often - close enough).  Cura normally then moves the Z to 0.3mm and prints with enough filament to fit into a 0.3mm height.  So far everything sounds normal/perfect/nominal.


    However that will result in prints not sticking well and popping off the bed during printing.


    So during the "leveling procedure" instead you use a piece of paper (the calibration card) that has a thickness of about 0.1mm.  When you "level" at the 3 points with the calibration card you are basically telling the printer that this is 0.1mm above the bed.  So you would think tha the printer would store internally that here is Z=0.1.  But no it cheats at this point and (depending on firmware version and so on) I believe it actually uses 0.07 on the UM2 (not certain as I never really cared all that much).


    So when you print at 0.27mm above the bed you are actually printing 0.24mm above the bed and overextruding by .27/.24 or 12% (much more than your suggested 2%).  However this is horrible - parts still pop off the bed.  I recommend about 200% overextrusion on the bottom layer.  I just level it at the start of a print and leave it there for weeks at a time without needing to adjust it.  Here's my guide to the perfect squishing on the bottom layer.  You can fix it on the fly when the print starts.  Using "initial layer flow" is too much work as far as I know.  Except maybe for the S5 which doesn't allow you to disable auto level:




    Examples of how bottom layer should look.  These pictures are from the internet mostly and I am just guessing that the bottom layer height for all of these is 0.3mm (cura defaults to 0.3 or 0.27 depending).  The numbers below indicate my best guess as to how far the nozzle was from the bed (again assuming .3mm is nominal).  

    The yellow one is a bit too squished but at least the part WILL NEVER COME LOOSE!  lol.  Danger is it might pull up glass when you try to get the print off.
    The blue one is about perfect if you want it to stick really well.  This is my goal squishiness.
    The red one is okay for small prints but for large prints they may come loose.  This is typical if you use the calibration card or auto level.
    The black one is leveled much too high above the bed.
    I aim for red or blue depending on my goals.  

    If I want it to stick better I squish a little more.  If I don't want the bottom layer to have a tiny brim I usually just set initial horizontal expansion to -0.2 or so but sometimes I instead go with what you see in red below.  For example if I'm printing tiny gear teeth, initial horizontal expansion of -0.2 will ruin them so I might go with -0.1 I.H.E. and level like the red one.

    I usually adjust the 3 screws (BY EQUAL AMOUNTS) at the start of every print although once it's perfect I don't have to touch leveling for months.




    • Thanks 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · Can "Initial Layer Flow" be used for adhesion? (it seems so)

    Thanks for the reply. I normally print with the offset of my Witbox calibrated in a way that the nozzle is a bit closer to the bed than it should be. There is no problem with this and I have to do it because if my print is very big, I have seen that the nozzle gets far from the bed when printing far from bed's center, enough to see some gaps, like if the bed were not perfectly flat.


    Edit: this is the reason I'm looking for better ways to enhance adhesion, rather than squeezing the nozzle toward the bed.

    Edited by Neukyhm
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Can "Initial Layer Flow" be used for adhesion? (it seems so)

    It seems that increasing initial layer flow does improve adhesion. The problem I have with my bed is that the glass isn't homogeneous, and I can see gaps when printing far from the center of the bed. Here is the test I did with simple one-layer squares.



    Here are the results:




    You see that 130% of initial layer flow almost removes the gaps without overextruding too much the center of the bed, where the bed gets closer to the nozzle.


    I hope this helps anybody ?

    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Can "Initial Layer Flow" be used for adhesion? (it seems so)

    Lol well we are all different ? Of late I have been printing my 1st layer at 70% flow. This has nothing to do with adhesion, which for me is fine, but it gives me a much better quality finish, i.e. homogenous and flat, rather than "liney". Of course it will be impacted by nozzle to bed distance for 1st layer, which for me controls the adhesion but I started to get poor consistency in lay down which in the end I convinced my brain was over extrusion (subsequent layers were perfect) and the reduction in 1st layer flow fixed it.


    The flow control was done using Repetier Host not Cura but I am guessing they are the same thing.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
      • Ultimaker Cura 5.6 stable released
        Cura now supports Method series printers!
        A year after the merger of Ultimaker and MakerBotQQ, we have unlocked the ability for users of our Method series printers to slice files using UltiMaker Cura. As of this release, users can find profiles for our Method and Method XL printers, as well as material profiles for ABS-R, ABS-CF, and RapidRinse. Meaning it’s now possible to use either Cura or the existing cloud-slicing software CloudPrint when printing with these printers or materials
        • 48 replies
    • Create New...