Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts

Copperfill and Woodfill experience

Recommended Posts

I know there have been a few question about user experience with Colorfabb Copperfill and Woodfill.  I thought I would post my experience.


First off, surface texture for both filament is excellent.  Copperfill density adds a nice feel to parts.


I started off with a 0.6 nozzle on the woodfill, that went fine, so I dialed back to 0.4, still fine, but the detail needed finer yet.  At the same time I decided to switch to Copperfill as the model (earrings) would benefit from that.  So my results on Copperfill are from a 3DSolex Hardcore, 0.25 steel nozzle. 0.05 layer height.


Copperfill print settings and retractions were used, I did slow the print speed down, and am now running Bondtec feeders, which for reasons that became clear later, made quite a difference, especially with the copper.


First, the good news.  The detail with Copperfill at 0.25 was better than even stock Ultimaker white PLA.  I had to leave an area on the underside to accommodate an earring post, so used PVA for support.  The earring on the left is straight off the printer, the one on the right has only had light sanding and a couple of mild runs with a copper scouring pad.


The 'other news'.  As expected, clogging is a significant issue with this fine a nozzle.  Each earring took about an hour.  The first print went as planned, clogging occured about 30% of the way through the second attempt, a significant clog that took a number of techniques to clear.  I suspect a combination of the particulates and heat creep.


Clearing copperfill using the standard 'hot pull' maintenance setting did not work as the temperature was not high enough.  I finally had success with some high temp PLA at between 230 and 240, working relatively quicky so I didn't soften the PLA too much. 


What I then decided was to do this modified hot pull after each print, and again at the end so there was nothing contaminating the nozzle for the next job.  This actually worked very nicely.


I've included an (obsolete) Canadian penny for reference on size and colour.  My bride is very happy, which means so am I 🙂








  • Like 1

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice, looks like wood before the polishing. I aim to try copperfill or bronze fill next week. I only have a small sample in a bag so im not sure which one it is. Well ill put it on copperfill settng and then....what speed would you use for a 0.6 nozzle at 0.06 layer height out of curiousity? Thanks for the post! I will do the same and do a comparison of copper plates to copper printed and i might even plate the copperfill model to see how it affects the surface quality. Ill aslo see how conductive it is....

Edited by cloakfiend

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

My experience with the 0.6 was woodfill only and I didn't get finer than 0.1 with that particular run - that said, I had no problems with standard speeds. I'm still learning what I can expect from these Bondtech feeders, but I ran at 50 for everything with a print temp of 205 with no issues. 


In terms of clogging, this is probably the most severe case I have encountered on my equipment, and I'm still unsure if it was just down to the nozzle diameter.  I suspect dialing down the layer height might have played a role.  I was running with an 80% infill as these were extremely thin and I needed as much strength as I could get.  I would not recommend more than that,  I get the sense that having some space for any ooze to escape internally helped delay trouble.


I kept the print that clogged, will post that, along with a woodfill example, next time I'm at the printer.


Good luck, will look forward to seeing your results!




Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Our picks

    • How to 3D print with reinforced engineering materials
      Ultimaker is hosting a webinar where we explain how you can achieve and maintain a high print success rate using these new reinforced engineering materials. Learn from Ultimaker's Product Manager of Materials and top chemical engineer Bart van As how you can take your 3D printing to that next level.
      • 0 replies
    • "Back To The Future" using Generative Design & Investment Casting
      Designing for light-weight parts is becoming more important, and I’m a firm believer in the need to produce lighter weight, less over-engineered parts for the future. This is for sustainability reasons because we need to be using less raw materials and, in things like transportation, it impacts the energy usage of the product during it’s service life.
        • Like
      • 12 replies

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!