Jump to content
UltiMaker Community of 3D Printing Experts

Random missing parts in a 3D Model in Cura 4.0.0


valely97
 Share

Recommended Posts

Posted · Random missing parts in a 3D Model in Cura 4.0.0

Hi, I tried to search on the internet for a solution to my problem, essentially I'm trying to prepare the print file of a 3D model. But when I preview the print in slice mode, there are parts missing.

Reading on different posts, I saw that the problem may be cause by thin walls, I tried to thicken the shell and enable "print thin walls" option but nothing works. And that's not all:
the missing parts change when I rotate the model, here are some examples

image.thumb.png.b35dd7eeacb220379ab7f912959c76dd.png

image.thumb.png.dfae535c67564214a3586b43c700dfdc.png

 

Does someone have a solution to this?

Thx in advance 🙂

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Random missing parts in a 3D Model in Cura 4.0.0
    1 hour ago, smartavionics said:

    Hello @valely97, when I tried to load that model, Cura told me it was too small and nothing appeared on the build plate.

    strange, try this one, I enlarged it with cinema 4d that I used for making it

    bagon-2.obj

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Random missing parts in a 3D Model in Cura 4.0.0

    Thanks for the 2nd file. It loaded but I get a warning about it not being watertight and it fails to slice correctly as you have found.

     

    Screenshot_2019-03-31_07-20-32.thumb.png.656e0abdaaf171ceaaca0b13192a301e.png

     

    Screenshot_2019-03-31_07-21-31.thumb.png.5c10e4e5314f89fb8ea56aea8f417c5f.png

     

    And freecad says it has self intersections...

     

    Screenshot_2019-03-31_07-36-24.thumb.png.ebc7ee32e37e9d3c60845345973e751a.png

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Random missing parts in a 3D Model in Cura 4.0.0

    Freecad also says...

     

    Screenshot_2019-03-31_07-42-28.thumb.png.f45a33936f1e72c778109750668fce72.png

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Random missing parts in a 3D Model in Cura 4.0.0
    3 hours ago, smartavionics said:

    Freecad also says...

     

    Screenshot_2019-03-31_07-42-28.thumb.png.f45a33936f1e72c778109750668fce72.png

    mmhh, thanks for pointing it out, what is your suggestion to fix it?

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Random missing parts in a 3D Model in Cura 4.0.0
    6 hours ago, valely97 said:

    mmhh, thanks for pointing it out, what is your suggestion to fix it?

     

    Sorry, I can't help you there but I'm sure that others can, perhaps @kmanstudios, can suggest a fix?

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Random missing parts in a 3D Model in Cura 4.0.0

    Honestly, without knowing how it was made AND, knowing nothing about Cinema 4D, I am not sure how to advise you.

     

    I use a completely different set of programs.

     

    But, I will take a look and see if I can fix it. :)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Random missing parts in a 3D Model in Cura 4.0.0

    OK, here is the fixed file:

    bagon-2_EK.STL

    It slices fine in my UM3 printer definition as you can see here.

    bagon-2_EK.thumb.jpg.1e2fb442b42fa437d2702b9651a3d197.jpg

     

    Now, there were a few issues with the model:

    1. All parts were overlapping individual objects
    2. The main body was watertight
    3. The overlapping parts were just 'shells'
      1. This means that the other parts were 2D shells
      2. This created a lot of confusion for Cura as to where to 'cap' or 'bridge' whist trying to clean up the model.

    They would not union (boolean) properly in any program that is just mesh based. In the future, it would be best to make sure the parts are 'capped' so that the individual parts would operate properly.

     

    I took the easy way: I imported into a program that can work with 'voxels' and it just did the work just fine. Keep in mind that voxels and mesh are two different ways of dealing with models. Booleans  in mesh is a real pain since they can create a lot of strange artifacts. However, booleans in voxels are blazingly fast and 'secure.' Voxels are volume based and when booleaned, they create a clean (superduper clean) outer volume that can then be exported into a mesh object. I could have reduced the polygons quite a bit more, but did not want to stray too far from your original model size.

     

    It really does not need so many polys since it is not really carrying much detail.

     

    How you would go about fixing this in Cinema4D, I could not say. So, I hope the above information helps in the future for you as 'capping', booleans, and 2D shells are common concepts in all modern mesh based programs.

    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Random missing parts in a 3D Model in Cura 4.0.0
    21 hours ago, kmanstudios said:

    OK, here is the fixed file:

    bagon-2_EK.STL 23.73 MB · 0 downloads

    It slices fine in my UM3 printer definition as you can see here.

    bagon-2_EK.thumb.jpg.1e2fb442b42fa437d2702b9651a3d197.jpg

     

    Now, there were a few issues with the model:

    1. All parts were overlapping individual objects
    2. The main body was watertight
    3. The overlapping parts were just 'shells'
      1. This means that the other parts were 2D shells
      2. This created a lot of confusion for Cura as to where to 'cap' or 'bridge' whist trying to clean up the model.

    They would not union (boolean) properly in any program that is just mesh based. In the future, it would be best to make sure the parts are 'capped' so that the individual parts would operate properly.

     

    I took the easy way: I imported into a program that can work with 'voxels' and it just did the work just fine. Keep in mind that voxels and mesh are two different ways of dealing with models. Booleans  in mesh is a real pain since they can create a lot of strange artifacts. However, booleans in voxels are blazingly fast and 'secure.' Voxels are volume based and when booleaned, they create a clean (superduper clean) outer volume that can then be exported into a mesh object. I could have reduced the polygons quite a bit more, but did not want to stray too far from your original model size.

     

    It really does not need so many polys since it is not really carrying much detail.

     

    How you would go about fixing this in Cinema4D, I could not say. So, I hope the above information helps in the future for you as 'capping', booleans, and 2D shells are common concepts in all modern mesh based programs.

    yo thank you so much for helping me! Much apreciated 🙂
    the 3D models I'm trying to use are ripped directly from a game files, I take it on cinema 4d because I found it more compatible if the model is rigged and have animations, after that i transform all the mesh layer into one. I already done this with other 2 models and printed normally as I expected, maybe this was particular case.
    Anyway thx again! 😄

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Random missing parts in a 3D Model in Cura 4.0.0
    7 minutes ago, valely97 said:

    Anyway thx again!

    You are welcome. Keep in mind, even if getting the files elsewhere, the above are things to check.

     

    3D rendering can overcome a multitude of sins since they can work with shells and 2D surfaces. And, games are more often than not just what amounts to 2D shells without any thickness to them. Also, many, many files are just not that good when you download them.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Random missing parts in a 3D Model in Cura 4.0.0
    On 3/31/2019 at 8:45 PM, kmanstudios said:

    OK, here is the fixed file:

    bagon-2_EK.STL 23.73 MB · 2 downloads

    It slices fine in my UM3 printer definition as you can see here.

    bagon-2_EK.thumb.jpg.1e2fb442b42fa437d2702b9651a3d197.jpg

     

    Now, there were a few issues with the model:

    1. All parts were overlapping individual objects
    2. The main body was watertight
    3. The overlapping parts were just 'shells'
      1. This means that the other parts were 2D shells
      2. This created a lot of confusion for Cura as to where to 'cap' or 'bridge' whist trying to clean up the model.

    They would not union (boolean) properly in any program that is just mesh based. In the future, it would be best to make sure the parts are 'capped' so that the individual parts would operate properly.

     

    I took the easy way: I imported into a program that can work with 'voxels' and it just did the work just fine. Keep in mind that voxels and mesh are two different ways of dealing with models. Booleans  in mesh is a real pain since they can create a lot of strange artifacts. However, booleans in voxels are blazingly fast and 'secure.' Voxels are volume based and when booleaned, they create a clean (superduper clean) outer volume that can then be exported into a mesh object. I could have reduced the polygons quite a bit more, but did not want to stray too far from your original model size.

     

    It really does not need so many polys since it is not really carrying much detail.

     

    How you would go about fixing this in Cinema4D, I could not say. So, I hope the above information helps in the future for you as 'capping', booleans, and 2D shells are common concepts in all modern mesh based programs.

    Hi it's me again, can I ask you what is this program for voxels you talk about here? I think I need it for fixing another similar problem

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Random missing parts in a 3D Model in Cura 4.0.0

    I use 3D Coat. But even Blender does voxels, and it is free. I just do not know the fidelity or speed of Blender.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
     Share

    • Our picks

      • Here it is. The new UltiMaker S7
        The UltiMaker S7 is built on the success of the UltiMaker S5 and its design decisions were heavily based on feedback from customers.
         
         
        So what’s new?
        The obvious change is the S7’s height. It now includes an integrated Air Manager. This filters the exhaust air of every print and also improves build temperature stability. To further enclose the build chamber the S7 only has one magnetically latched door.
         
        The build stack has also been completely redesigned. A PEI-coated flexible steel build plate makes a big difference to productivity. Not only do you not need tools to pop a printed part off. But we also don’t recommend using or adhesion structures for UltiMaker materials (except PC, because...it’s PC). Along with that, 4 pins and 25 magnets make it easy to replace the flex plate perfectly – even with one hand.
         
        The re-engineered print head has an inductive sensor which reduces noise when probing the build plate. This effectively makes it much harder to not achieve a perfect first layer, improving overall print success. We also reversed the front fan direction (fewer plastic hairs, less maintenance), made the print core door magnets stronger, and add a sensor that helps avoid flooding.
         

         
        The UltiMaker S7 also includes quality of life improvements:
        Reliable bed tilt compensation (no more thumbscrews) 2.4 and 5 GHz Wi-Fi A 1080p camera (mounted higher for a better view) Compatibility with 280+ Marketplace materials Compatibility with S5 project files (no reslicing needed) And a whole lot more  
        Curious to see the S7 in action?
        We’re hosting a free tech demo on February 7.
        It will be live and you can ask any questions to our CTO, Miguel Calvo.
        Register here for the Webinar
          • Like
        • 11 replies
      • UltiMaker Cura 5.3.0-Alpha 🎄 Tree Support Spotlight 🎄
        Are you a fan of tree support, but dislike the removal process and the amount of filament it uses? Then we would like to invite you to try this special release of UltiMaker Cura. Brought to you by our special community contributor @thomasrahm
         
        We generated a special version of Cura 5.2 called 5.3.0 Alpha + Xmas. The only changes we introduced compared to UltiMaker Cura 5.2.1 are those which are needed for the new supports. So keep in mind, this is not a sneak peek for Cura 5.3 (there are some really cool new features coming up) but a spotlight release highlighting this new version of tree supports.  
          • Like
        • 17 replies
      • New here? Get ahead with a free onboarding course
        Hi,
         
        Often getting started is the most difficult part of any process. A good start sets you up for success and saves you time and energy that could be spent elsewhere. That is why we have a onboarding course ready for
        Ultimaker S5 Pro Bundle, Ultimaker S5, Ultimaker S3 Ultimaker 2+ Connect.   
        They're ready for you on the Ultimaker Academy platform. All you need to do to gain access is to register your product to gain free access. 
        Ready? Register your product here in just 60 seconds.
          • Like
        • 14 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...