Jump to content
UltiMaker Community of 3D Printing Experts

Feature request; Inner wall inset or flow


Recommended Posts

Posted · Feature request; Inner wall inset or flow



I'm currently battling a problem where my inner walls do not connect with each other or the outer wall - especially around smaller circular holes. 
I've searched around a lot online and talked to people in different groups, this seems to be a common problem with no real solution, other than increasing flow % (I have experimented a lot with different settings to little success) - which can have adverse effects in other areas of the print. 

"Outer wall inset" fixes the problem fantastically, but affects the dimensions of the printed piece; for a modeled 1/8" hole, the "outer wall inset" will squish the outer walls closer into the print and end up with a hole larger than 1/8".
(Reading the description of "outer wall inset" I'm using it under different parameters than designed for; I have a .6mm nozzle with a .72mm line width rather than a smaller than nozzle diameter line width. Regardless, the outcome is favorable, just not the part deformation.)

I would like a way to squish the inner walls into the outer wall, rather than vice versa. Perhaps a "inner wall inset" if you will. This way the dimensional accuracy will be kept while achieving the same effect.
This could potentially also be solved by allowing a separate control of inner wall flow; if I could bump my inner walls to 110% or something and overextrude for them to better connect with each other and the outer wall, that'd be fantastic. 

I think this feature would be very helpful. 
(If there is a better place to post this feature request, I'd appreciate somebody pointing me in the right direction)

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Feature request; Inner wall inset or flow

    When walls aren't attaching it's always caused by underextrusion.  This is one of the places that people notice it first (when it's only like 10 to 20% underextruding).


    Slow down your print.  When you print a .72 line width through a .6 nozzle it takes MUCH more pressure to squeeze that filament into the small gaps.  Assuming 20% underextrusion, try slowing it down by 40% (print at 60% speed).  You can control the speed on most printers out there in the TUNE menu if you have a variant of Marlin firmware on your printer.  That way you can tweak the speed live while it prints and see if it looks better or worse with feedback in a few seconds rather than waiting for an entire print to finish.  Don't experiment on the bottom 2 layers which are affected more by leveling position and tend to run at lower speeds anyway.


    If it all possible, print at .6 line width.  That way you might not have to slow down the print.


    There are lots of causes for underextrusion - hundreds - here's a random one: A single CF filament print long ago wears down the feeder spline and now the feeder slips too much as the splines aren't sharp.  The causes are different for each printer so contact an expert who knows your printer very well.  Other causes could be bad teflon, overheating stepper driver, print too cold (bad sensor), printing too fast, printing layer heights too thick, and I swear there's dozen's more.  My list for the UM2 and UM3 is about 20 things to check.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Feature request; Inner wall inset or flow

    A new feature of the 4.2 (beta) release is that you can set the flows for features individually. So using that you could crank up the inner wall flow...



  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Feature request; Inner wall inset or flow

    gr5; I've got my e-steps dialed in, and get no under extrusion elsewhere in my prints other than these inner walls. I'm printing inner walls at 30 mm/s, I'll drop it lower and see if that helps. 
    For my line width, I read a few places that 1.2x nozzle diameter is recommended so I gave it a try. I was printing at .6mm line width with the same issue occuring. 

    burtoogle; Fantastic! Thanks a bunch for letting me know. I'll download and play with it. 

    I still think an "inner wall inset" would be a nice option to have as well. There may be scenarios where that may be preferred over inner wall flow - though none come to mind right now. 😁

    Thank you both for your quick replies, very much appreciated!

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Feature request; Inner wall inset or flow
    On 7/20/2019 at 4:10 PM, Adamada said:

    I read a few places that 1.2x nozzle diameter is recommended

    Instead of increasing flow and making the feeder push even harder (potentially turning the filament into powder) try 1X or even 0.8X nozzle diameter - just to see what happens.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.3 stable released
        In this stable release, Cura 5.3 achieves yet another huge leap forward in 3D printing thanks to material interlocking! As well as introducing an expanded recommended print settings menu and lots of print quality improvements. Not to mention, a whole bunch of new printer profiles for non-UltiMaker printers!
          • Thanks
          • Like
        • 24 replies
      • Here it is. The new UltiMaker S7
        The UltiMaker S7 is built on the success of the UltiMaker S5 and its design decisions were heavily based on feedback from customers.
        So what’s new?
        The obvious change is the S7’s height. It now includes an integrated Air Manager. This filters the exhaust air of every print and also improves build temperature stability. To further enclose the build chamber the S7 only has one magnetically latched door.
        The build stack has also been completely redesigned. A PEI-coated flexible steel build plate makes a big difference to productivity. Not only do you not need tools to pop a printed part off. But we also don’t recommend using or adhesion structures for UltiMaker materials (except PC, because...it’s PC). Along with that, 4 pins and 25 magnets make it easy to replace the flex plate perfectly – even with one hand.
        The re-engineered print head has an inductive sensor which reduces noise when probing the build plate. This effectively makes it much harder to not achieve a perfect first layer, improving overall print success. We also reversed the front fan direction (fewer plastic hairs, less maintenance), made the print core door magnets stronger, and add a sensor that helps avoid flooding.

        The UltiMaker S7 also includes quality of life improvements:
        Reliable bed tilt compensation (no more thumbscrews) 2.4 and 5 GHz Wi-Fi A 1080p camera (mounted higher for a better view) Compatibility with 280+ Marketplace materials Compatibility with S5 project files (no reslicing needed) And a whole lot more  
        Curious to see the S7 in action?
        We’re hosting a free tech demo on February 7.
        It will be live and you can ask any questions to our CTO, Miguel Calvo.
        Register here for the Webinar
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • UltiMaker Cura Alpha 🎄 Tree Support Spotlight 🎄
        Are you a fan of tree support, but dislike the removal process and the amount of filament it uses? Then we would like to invite you to try this special release of UltiMaker Cura. Brought to you by our special community contributor @thomasrahm
        We generated a special version of Cura 5.2 called 5.3.0 Alpha + Xmas. The only changes we introduced compared to UltiMaker Cura 5.2.1 are those which are needed for the new supports. So keep in mind, this is not a sneak peek for Cura 5.3 (there are some really cool new features coming up) but a spotlight release highlighting this new version of tree supports.  
          • Like
        • 22 replies
    • Create New...