that cant be it because it's added a third time at line 89 in accordance with the specified startcode
Attached are 2 gcodes. the FIBO one is sliced with 4.10 same startcode, those lines aren't there
The upgrade one is sliced with 4.11.
Same startcode yet one has it, the other one doesn't.
CrealityMaxExtruderUpgrade-260_0.4N_0.2LH_0D3H49M.gcode FiBo_-_Base_-_Short_45mm_0.4N_0.2LH_1D1H13M.gcode
Add the line as I stated in my previous post. You don't have the keyword for the bed temp in your Start Gcode so Cura is adding the M140 and M190. You will notice that Cura is NOT adding the Hot End Temp because you do have the keyword in the StartUp Gcode.
;Generated with Cura_SteamEngine 4.11.0-BETA
M82 ;absolute extrusion mode
; Ender 3 Custom Start G-code
;Here is the HotEnd temp line using the keyword
M104 S210
;Here is the Bed temp line using the keyword
M140 S50
G92 E0 ; Reset
Notice that Cura does not add the prefix temperatures for either the hot end nor the bed.
;Generated with Cura_SteamEngine 4.11.0-BETA
M140 S50
M105
M190 S50
M82 ;absolute extrusion mode
; Ender 3 Custom Start G-code
;Here is the HotEnd temp line
M104 S210
;Here is the Bed temp line commented out
;M140 S{material_bed_temperature_layer_0}
M140 S70
M190 S70
Cura doesn't acknowledge the M140 or M190 because they are explicit and my M140 with the keyword is a comment so it doesn't count either, and so the bed temperature is inserted as a prefix.
Edited by GregValiant
1
And as i stated i didn't have that keyword there in 4.10, yet it's not being added. I've never had that line in there. Explain that. My startcode always has been using explicit M140/M190, yet 4.10 didn't add those redundant lines and 4.11 does.
The only thing i changed manually between 4.10 and 4.11 (in light of levelling) was:
Quote; Setting pre-levelling temperatures
M117 Pre-Heating
M104 S160 ; Set hotend temp & continue
M190 S60 ; Set bed temp & wait
to
Quote; Setting pre-levelling temperatures
M117 Pre-Heating
M104 S160 ; Set hotend temp & continue
M190 S70 ; Set bed temp & wait
and
Quote; Final heating & nozzle Prime
M117 Final Nozzle Heating
M109 S{material_print_temperature_layer_0}
M190 S{material_bed_temperature_layer_0}
to
Quote; Final heating & nozzle Prime
M117 Final Nozzle Heating
M109 S{material_print_temperature_layer_0}
because i noticed z-offset differences between the bed pre-heat temp of 60° and 70° so i simply increased the hardset pre-heat temp from 60 to 70, and removed the bed temp line in the final heating section as it was no longer needed.
Edited by Ch3vr0n
I'm just saying that if you put that line back in there those pre-temps will go away. If you think this is a bug then there is a form you can fill out on GitHub and a team member will take a look at it.
1
Thanks for helping, this one also got me real frustrated.
I tried different methods and yet still failed.
With your help I've managed to get rid of the bed temp but now nozzle temp stays, again tried different methods but could not succeed.
Could you also please help with te nozzle temperature?
This is what I get in my g-code and want to get rid of:
This is what I put in start up code section of printer settings:
Those keywords and the use of square brackets I believe would work with PrusaSlicer.
Cura uses the keywords I put in my previous post and curly brackets.
Install a new instance of your printer in Cura.
Copy and paste my suggested Start and End gcodes into the new printer's Machine Settings in Cura. That will allow you to keep your current setup.
1
1 hour ago, GregValiant said:Those keywords and the use of square brackets I believe would work with PrusaSlicer.
Cura uses the keywords I put in my previous post and curly brackets.
Install a new instance of your printer in Cura.
Copy and paste my suggested Start and End gcodes into the new printer's Machine Settings in Cura. That will allow you to keep your current setup.
Thank you for your fast and accurate answer.
That is correct I copied those from my Superslicer, reason that I'm currently switching over to Cura (even though Cura is slower to print) is because I have smaller nozzle (0.3) and Superslicer seems having trouble to select a 0.16 profile.
Here is my original Cura start code:
No matter what I try Cura adds these in the beginning of mine generated g-code:
If you don't have the Keywords in your start gcode then Cura assumes it must heat the bed and hot end to avoid cold extruding.
In that snippet - your startup gcode consists of all the lines with comments (the comments are green in your snippet). You can see that there is no mention of temperature in there and so Cura adds the heating lines before the startup gcode goes in.
What you have up there is the stock CR-10, Ender 3, Ender 3 Pro, Ender 5, CR6, etc., StartUp Gcode. It is the policy of Creality to NOT heat the bed and hot end at the same time. I think they were worried about the current draw when both were starting out cold. I have not had a problem heating both at once. Essentially it is used for all the Creality printers.
I have three Ender 3 Pro printers installed because I print PETG slow, and TPU very slow, and the speed settings of the purge lines needed to be adjusted. Rather than do that every time; I just installed additional printers and each has a slightly different StartUp Gcode. This is from my PLA version and is mostly the stock E3Pro stuff but I added the lines with the keywords. You can see that I don't have it waiting for the bed to hit full temperature because for PLA I don't care if I start with a cool bed. The PETG version does have an M190 because if the bed isn't hot I have adhesion problems.
;
; Ender 3 Custom Start G-code
;
M140 S{material_bed_temperature_layer_0}
M109 S{material_print_temperature_layer_0}
G92 E0 ; Reset
G28 X Y ; Home all axes
G1 Z12.0 F3000 ; Move Z
G1 X1.0 Y20 Z0.3 F5000.0 ; Move
G1 X1.0 Y200.0 Z0.3 F1500.0 E15 ; Draw the first line
G1 X3.0 Y200.0 Z0.3 F5000.0 ; Move
G1 X3.0 Y20 Z0.3 F1500.0 E30 ; Draw the second line
G1 E28 F1800 ;retract 2mm
G92 E0 ; Reset Extruder
G1 Z12.0 F3000 ; Move Z Axis up little to prevent scratching of Heat Bed
G1 X5 Y20 Z10.3 F5000.0 ; Move over
;
;End of StartUp
;
The line you show at the end (G1 F1500 E-6.5) is always added by Cura if you are using retractions. Since I already retract 2mm, any additional retraction kept my skirt from printing until the nozzle had traveled a bit. I found that annoying so I added a "Search and Replace" post process and it searches for that line and replaces it with G92 E-3.0. That works for me. So 2mm takes up the slack and the third mm brings up the pressure in the nozzle and printing starts when it should. That might possibly (probably) be a bit anal, but it works.
1
I tell you what. Bring a model into Cura (like a calibration cube or benchy or something small). Set Cura up the way you like and then use the "File | Save Project" command and then post the resulting 3mf file here. A Project file contains your printer, all the Cura settings, and the model so it is a complete package. I'll take a look at half-time in the 49ers v Packers game.
Cura allows me to run my Ender at up to 500mm/sec while printing. The machine won't take it mnd you, but I conceivably could print that fast. Your CR10 is bigger and the bed is heavier but print time should not be any different than with any other slicer.
I have 19 slicers installed (I should get a life!) and there is no speed problem with any of them.
Edited by GregValiant
1
14 hours ago, GregValiant said:I tell you what. Bring a model into Cura (like a calibration cube or benchy or something small). Set Cura up the way you like and then use the "File | Save Project" command and then post the resulting 3mf file here. A Project file contains your printer, all the Cura settings, and the model so it is a complete package. I'll take a look at half-time in the 49ers v Packers game.
Cura allows me to run my Ender at up to 500mm/sec while printing. The machine won't take it mnd you, but I conceivably could print that fast. Your CR10 is bigger and the bed is heavier but print time should not be any different than with any other slicer.
I have 19 slicers installed (I should get a life!) and there is no speed problem with any of them.
Thank you for your help.
I have an Ender 3 V2 and when slicing with Superslicer mostly I get a faster print time than slicing the same thing in Cura, sometime Cura takes 2 hours more compared to Superslicing. I know it has something to do with my knowledge of tweaking the Cura, but still I'm new and use this purely as hobby to print fun things for my children and friends.
Im going to try your method and let you know if it helped, thanks again for all the help.
ArunC posted a topic in Ultimaker Cura,
.thumb.jpeg.0b7a05eafc09add17b8338efde5852e9.jpeg)
MariMakes posted a topic in Official news,
.png.e7a3560300dbb24c6ece29a701a84b73.png)
MariMakes posted a topic in Ultimaker Cura,
Recommended Posts
GregValiant 980
It's because you explicitly state "M190 S70" in your start gcode instead of using a keyword. Cura adds the bed temperature line when you do that.
If you change that line to "M190 S{material_bed_temperature_layer_0}" then Cura will stop adding it's own lines. You could also add the "M190 S{material_bed_temperature_layer_0}" down near the M109 line if you wanted to heat the bed to 70 for leveling and then settle at a different temperature.
Link to post
Share on other sites