Jump to content
UltiMaker Community of 3D Printing Experts

Print a stiff, inflexible plate: what are the best settings..?


shoe

Recommended Posts

Posted · Print a stiff, inflexible plate: what are the best settings..?

Hi,

 

I want to print a 200mm x 120mm x 10mm plate. I want it to be as inflexible and stiff (no bending) as possible. What are generally the most optimal settings..? Should I increase the wall-count and top and bottom layer count? What should the infill look like? Should I play with the infill multiplier?

 

Is there a rule of thumb as to best determine all the parameters for a given amount of filament I want to use for printing the plate?

 

Cheers,

shoe

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Print a stiff, inflexible plate: what are the best settings..?

    I think "Grid" is the best all purpose infill.  With the "Infill Line Multiplier" at 3 you will get a noticeable increase in stiffness.  I would think an Infill Density of 10% at 3 lines thick would be sufficient.  Changing the Infill Line Directions to [0,90] might help as well.  The "best" line directions would depend on the directions of the load that you expect the part to see.

    If you require the stiffness because the part will see some sort of twisting load then Wall Thickness and Layer Height will become more important.

     

    "Is there a rule of thumb as to best determine all the parameters for a given amount of filament I want to use for printing the plate?"

    "The amount of filament I want to use" is something I've never considered.  The volume of filament is-what-it-is depending on the geometry of the part and the infill structure it requires to perform the function it was designed to.

    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Print a stiff, inflexible plate: what are the best settings..?

    Well. Amount of filament. Print time. Whatever metric you want to use. I don't want to waste time and money (PLA, electricity). Common wisdom is to increase the outer shell (top, bottom, walls). It seems infill plays almost no role in "strength" and "stiffness". Maybe I am mistaken.

     

    But maybe beyond a certain wall count (e.g. 6), this rule doesn't hold true and it makes more sense then to increase infill to get better strength/stiffness.

     

    Those kind of rules I was hoping for. For example, for every two walls increase infill by 10%. Rules like that.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Print a stiff, inflexible plate: what are the best settings..?

    "Rules???  We don't need no stinkin' rules!!!" - Various (but may have started in "Treasure of the Sierra Madre")

    "They're not actually rules as such.  More like guidelines" - Capt. Barbossa - "Pirates of the Caribbean"

     

    Pretty much every model has it's own needs.  Saying "this is always how you do it" isn't going to work very often because there will always be an "Except when _____ _____ ______."

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · Print a stiff, inflexible plate: what are the best settings..?

    Ok, let's settle on guidelines.

     

    I was hoping there would be some recommendations. Let's say you go up to 5 layers top/bottom and 6 walls and line multiplier of 2 with 10% infill. So if you want to get it stiffer, is more walls or a bigger multiplier better. I was hoping somebody did such tests.

    Edited by shoe
  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted (edited) · Print a stiff, inflexible plate: what are the best settings..?

    What material were you thinking of using?  PLA is very rigid but when it warms up it will deform.  PETG is more compliant but has better heat deformation resistance.

    I have managed to run over a print with my car.  It had single line infill at around 10% and it was fine.  If it would have been larger so that there was more distance between the walls then the upper layers may have crushed.

    There have been a couple of posters here who were involved in some FEA analysis of FDM prints.  They asked a couple of questions and were gone.  I've never seen any results from an analysis of that type.

    Overall strength in compression is actually pretty good.  It depends on the shape of the model and the force loading to know how it will hold up.

    A compression load on a screw connection is another story.  Cold flow deformation at the screw head and at the face of the nut will cause the connection to loosen.  That will happen every time with either PLA or PETG.  The warmer the environment the worse the condition and the quicker the failure.

    Overall strength in tension is not good.  The layer adhesion is the main weak point and so in that case more walls can't hurt.

    If there is a twisting moment in the loading so that one side of a model is in tension and the other side in compression then the layers will fail do to the tension before the compressed side fails.

    If you do a search for FEA (Finite Element Analysis) of FDM models maybe something will come up that you can use.

    Edited by GregValiant
    • Like 1
    Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.3 stable released
        In this stable release, Cura 5.3 achieves yet another huge leap forward in 3D printing thanks to material interlocking! As well as introducing an expanded recommended print settings menu and lots of print quality improvements. Not to mention, a whole bunch of new printer profiles for non-UltiMaker printers!
          • Thanks
          • Like
        • 22 replies
      • Here it is. The new UltiMaker S7
        The UltiMaker S7 is built on the success of the UltiMaker S5 and its design decisions were heavily based on feedback from customers.
         
         
        So what’s new?
        The obvious change is the S7’s height. It now includes an integrated Air Manager. This filters the exhaust air of every print and also improves build temperature stability. To further enclose the build chamber the S7 only has one magnetically latched door.
         
        The build stack has also been completely redesigned. A PEI-coated flexible steel build plate makes a big difference to productivity. Not only do you not need tools to pop a printed part off. But we also don’t recommend using or adhesion structures for UltiMaker materials (except PC, because...it’s PC). Along with that, 4 pins and 25 magnets make it easy to replace the flex plate perfectly – even with one hand.
         
        The re-engineered print head has an inductive sensor which reduces noise when probing the build plate. This effectively makes it much harder to not achieve a perfect first layer, improving overall print success. We also reversed the front fan direction (fewer plastic hairs, less maintenance), made the print core door magnets stronger, and add a sensor that helps avoid flooding.
         

         
        The UltiMaker S7 also includes quality of life improvements:
        Reliable bed tilt compensation (no more thumbscrews) 2.4 and 5 GHz Wi-Fi A 1080p camera (mounted higher for a better view) Compatibility with 280+ Marketplace materials Compatibility with S5 project files (no reslicing needed) And a whole lot more  
        Curious to see the S7 in action?
        We’re hosting a free tech demo on February 7.
        It will be live and you can ask any questions to our CTO, Miguel Calvo.
        Register here for the Webinar
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • UltiMaker Cura Alpha 🎄 Tree Support Spotlight 🎄
        Are you a fan of tree support, but dislike the removal process and the amount of filament it uses? Then we would like to invite you to try this special release of UltiMaker Cura. Brought to you by our special community contributor @thomasrahm
         
        We generated a special version of Cura 5.2 called 5.3.0 Alpha + Xmas. The only changes we introduced compared to UltiMaker Cura 5.2.1 are those which are needed for the new supports. So keep in mind, this is not a sneak peek for Cura 5.3 (there are some really cool new features coming up) but a spotlight release highlighting this new version of tree supports.  
          • Like
        • 22 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...