Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
Sign in to follow this  
regpye

G code addition for beginning

Recommended Posts

I am having to use the raft feature quiet often due to small size parts that are being printed.

Most times the skirt that is put down before the raft is printed is incomplete at the beginning. This makes a fault in the raft sometimes. (lifting back on itself)

Is it possible to do either of these things to fix this problem?

1. Make the skirt go around twice instead of just once.

or

2. Add some G-code at the beginning to put down a line of filament before starting the skirt so that the nozzle is purged and loaded with molten filament before starting the skirt.

I have tried to add some code myself, but not knowing how to do it properly it is not working as I want.

I have a self built machine that has bed leveling built in and the nozzle starts at the front right hand side of the bed. I would like to run a line of filament about 80mm towards X0 before the skirt starts, is that possible?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Standard (expert) settings for Skirt are:

Line count: 1

Start distance (mm): 3.0

Minimal length (mm): 150

That means it will make at least 1 line around the model. If that results in more than 150mm length, then the skirt is done. If it's less than 150 mm, it will make more skirt lines until the total length reaches 150mm. I like that, because that way it doesn't make a difference whether if you're printing a large or small model.

I changed the minimal length setting to 300mm which, until now, has always been enough to compensate for the delayed extrusion.

But I haven't been using Skirt for a long time now - brim is usually the best choice. Never used a raft either. With brim, you'll just get about 1-2 lines less (...because extrusion doesn't start instantly), but that doesn't make much of a difference...

Sometimes I also start a print, let it run until the extrusion is good, then stop, quickly clean the build plate, and restart. But that's not really necessary, I'm just over-cautious :)

/edit:

That's of course assuming you are using Cura and not another slicing software ;)

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • Taking Advantage of DfAM
      This is a statement that’s often made about AM/3DP. I'll focus on the way DfAM can take advantage of some of the unique capabilities that AM and 3DP have to offer. I personally think that the use of AM/3DP for light-weighting is one of it’s most exciting possibilities and one that could play a key part in the sustainability of design and manufacturing in the future.
        • Like
      • 3 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!