Jump to content
Ultimaker Community of 3D Printing Experts
Sign in to follow this  
gothampixel

what's the deal with 2.85mm vs. 3mm?

Recommended Posts

I stopped by the Inside 3D Printing Conference today in NYC and was talking with the guys from Ninja Flex. They sell a very flexible filament in both 1.75mm and 3mm sizes. I asked if their 3mm size was true 3mm or 2.85mm with a tolerance up to 3mm. They said they never heard of the 2.85mm standard and as far as they know their filament is true 3mm. How common is 2.85 and is it going to be supported by filament makers going forward?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

90% of filament that claims it is 3mm is actually 2.85mm or 2.9mm. The remaining 10% that are truly at 3.00mm are a problem for the UM and can't be used. Don't even try it. Most of these manufacturers get enough feedback that within a few years they figure out that they should be making slightly smaller filament.

Just because an employee doesn't know about this, doesn't mean the company itself is also ignorant about this.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Our picks

    • Taking Advantage of DfAM
      This is a statement that’s often made about AM/3DP. I'll focus on the way DfAM can take advantage of some of the unique capabilities that AM and 3DP have to offer. I personally think that the use of AM/3DP for light-weighting is one of it’s most exciting possibilities and one that could play a key part in the sustainability of design and manufacturing in the future.
        • Like
      • 3 replies
×

Important Information

Welcome to the Ultimaker Community of 3D printing experts. Visit the following links to read more about our Terms of Use or our Privacy Policy. Thank you!