Jump to content

Is it necessary to print layer by layer?


ppaanngggg

Recommended Posts

Posted · Is it necessary to print layer by layer?

(sorry for my poor english...)

I wonder whether it is necessary to print layer by layer from bottom to up for one model using cura.

For example, when print one model with two peak, is it possible to print one peak after finishing the other peak?

I have googled, but I didn't find answer...

 

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Is it necessary to print layer by layer?

    Not to my knowledge. What the slicer does is to compute the model, layer by layer, no way around this.

    The thing is, if you first printed one peak, then "go down" and start printing the second peak, the head could run into the first peak and knock the model down.

    You can indeed print two different models sequentially on the same plate, first one, then the other, but this is another story.

     

    (sorry for my poor english...)

    I wonder whether it is necessary to print layer by layer from bottom to up for one model using cura.

    For example, when print one model with two peak, is it possible to print one peak after finishing the other peak?

    I have googled, but I didn't find answer...

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Is it necessary to print layer by layer?

    Cura doesn't do this and it would be challenging to write robust (and fast) code that would be able to do a very good job of recognizing when it could divide up a model this way.

    You could however probably do it manually. This would involve creating to versions of your model. One with one peak and one with the other. You would load one model into Cura and get the gcode for it. Then load the other model into the exact same position as the first. You would then copy the gcode for the second peak and (with a few modifications) paste it to the end of the gcode for the model with the first peak. Totally a pain to do, but totally possible.

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Is it necessary to print layer by layer?

    Not to my knowledge. What the slicer does is to compute the model, layer by layer, no way around this.

    The thing is, if you first printed one peak, then "go down" and start printing the second peak, the head could run into the first peak and knock the model down.

    You can indeed print two different models sequentially on the same plate, first one, then the other, but this is another story.

    Cura doesn't do this and it would be challenging to write robust (and fast) code that would be able to do a very good job of recognizing when it could divide up a model this way.

    You could however probably do it manually. This would involve creating to versions of your model. One with one peak and one with the other. You would load one model into Cura and get the gcode for it. Then load the other model into the exact same position as the first. You would then copy the gcode for the second peak and (with a few modifications) paste it to the end of the gcode for the model with the first peak. Totally a pain to do, but totally possible.

    Thank you. I want it to print necessarily layer by layer :)

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Is it necessary to print layer by layer?

    Hi,

    Welcome to the forum.

    Additionally to what have been told you also need to take into account the time spent on a layer. If you have a thin tower the printer might have to slow down on a layer because it need to give it some cooling time (see minimum layer time advanced settings) and so it could raise the print time quite a bit. If the tower is too thin the printer might not be able to let the layer cool down enough (see minimum speed in expert settings) and the results will be melted plastic because the nozzle stay in contact for too long with the plastic like this:

    IMG 2853[1]

     

    If thats the case you can use Cool head lift settings in the expert settings.

     

    So printing individual towers could lead to more problems.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Posted · Is it necessary to print layer by layer?

    While in theory this can be done, in practice however, is complex to add the code for it, and it has limited use cases.

     

  • Link to post
    Share on other sites

    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now
    • Our picks

      • UltiMaker Cura 5.7 stable released
        Cura 5.7 is here and it brings a handy new workflow improvement when using Thingiverse and Cura together, as well as additional capabilities for Method series printers, and a powerful way of sharing print settings using new printer-agnostic project files! Read on to find out about all of these improvements and more. 
         
          • Like
        • 18 replies
      • S-Line Firmware 8.3.0 was released Nov. 20th on the "Latest" firmware branch.
        (Sorry, was out of office when this released)

        This update is for...
        All UltiMaker S series  
        New features
         
        Temperature status. During print preparation, the temperatures of the print cores and build plate will be shown on the display. This gives a better indication of the progress and remaining wait time. Save log files in paused state. It is now possible to save the printer's log files to USB if the currently active print job is paused. Previously, the Dump logs to USB option was only enabled if the printer was in idle state. Confirm print removal via Digital Factory. If the printer is connected to the Digital Factory, it is now possible to confirm the removal of a previous print job via the Digital Factory interface. This is useful in situations where the build plate is clear, but the operator forgot to select Confirm removal on the printer’s display. Visit this page for more information about this feature.
          • Like
        • 0 replies
    ×
    ×
    • Create New...