Jump to content

ultiarjan

Ambassador
  • Posts

    3,778
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    76

Posts posted by ultiarjan

  1. 5a449f6ac1e6f_speedUltimakerCura.png.b2105c51547cb6121689f7f5ef145424.png

     

    Well.... besides the "elaborate profiles" some of the speed settings are a bit strange. Ultimaker Cura defines the main speed setting as the INFILL speed.

    Basically you set half the speed you think you set in some profiles, above sample is standard PLA for UM3.

     

    I personally don't like my infill to print crappy, so I flatten out the speeds to be closer to each other.

    • Like 1
  2. On 21-12-2017 at 5:56 AM, DidierKlein said:

    or you upgrade to the 2+ feeder

     

    Besides the UM2+ feeder (which is fine) ,  also a bondtech feeder is a good option.

    The Ultimaker feeder is notoriously difficult to get as a loose product, in the Netherlands it's euro 144 ex tax. The bondtech QR is a little cheaper for euro135 ex tax.

    http://shop.bondtech.se/ec/extruders/

     

    There's also a bondtech DDG extruder, but it reuses parts of the Ultimaker + feeder, and if you already have an Ultimaker + feeder for most people there will be no need to upgrade.

  3. On 5-12-2017 at 6:52 PM, EMDL said:

    Printing core suggestions needed

     

    As mentioned the metal particles will kill your CORE nozzle quickly.

    Unfortunately Ultimaker does not have any solution on the market for this atm. I hope they someday will bring us a 0.6 RUBY CORE.

     

    For now the only solution for the UM3 comes from 3DSolex, with the "everlasting" nozzle ( lol, I would not take that literally ) 

    http://3dsolex.com/product/um3-hardcore/

    http://3dsolex.com/product/everlast-hardcore-nozzles/

     

    I have not tried the "everlast" myself, but as said it's the only UM3 option atm.  For now the best/cheapest option is printing abrasives on an Ultimaker2. Here you have the option to simply throw away the worn out brass nozzle, or get a RUBY  nozzle; http://olssonruby.com/

     

     

     

  4. Agree with peggy, probably the Z axis autoleveling.

    If you find it annoying please know that you can print perfectly without autoleveling.

    The mechanical stability of an UM bed is very good, once you manually level the bed you can go for a long time without leveling.

    Also if you keep using autoleveling, its useful to make sure you do a good manual leveling first, so there is less need for compensation.

    • Like 1
  5. 27 minutes ago, shurik said:

    Somehow I'm being bombarded by new email messages for every new post in this thread despite updating the notification settings a few times from the mobile. 

     

    Maybe obvious.... but did you save the changes?  I changed email notifications and it seems to work for me

     

    image.thumb.png.4ca832e014fb79d4a181e91a643500c5.png

    • Like 1
  6. Though I have not seen the DDG irl it's seems to me it has one disadvantage over the old bondtech models as you can't reach the gears for cleaning. The bondtech type drive-wheels do pollute (fill up with filament) sometimes. Not a big issue, I use and like the bondtech myself on one machine, but it does need cleaning once and a while. Of course you can also take apart the new model, but it's less easy.

  7. Found what I think is a bug, no idea if it's specific for 3.1.

    When using a post-processing g-code modifier, In my case "pause at height" on the UM3, it will not be applied when printing over the network directly form cura. If however you print via USB, or even if you first save the file somewhere and than print over network, the change will be applied.

×
×
  • Create New...