Somehow I can't paste a link on my phone... but have look at my summary om page 27 of the article "a different multi extrusion approach" in "modifications and hacks"
Sweet! Looks like my weekend will be busy.
Somehow I can't paste a link on my phone... but have look at my summary om page 27 of the article "a different multi extrusion approach" in "modifications and hacks"
Sweet! Looks like my weekend will be busy.
@insight01: The UM2 was not intended to be a tinkerer machine. It comes with a CE conformity declaration which is void if the printer is modified (this might not be important for you but for other people). Thats why the UMO is still available and will stay available (maybe only as UMO+ at some point).
What filament are you referring to? I have the impression that almost any filament also comes now in 2.85mm. The thicker one is anyway easier to produce.
Basically it's ok if you'r a hobbyist but check the rules in your country/company if used in a business.
when I bought mine I was not intending to tinker with the machine.... but that changed in the first couple of weeks I had it
I have also several projects to modify and inprove my UM2 starting on the basis of the standard machine.
I have the same problem to get technical datas and I have nothing to do with the CE mark.
The post "a different multi extrusion approach" that I have seen is very interesting, unfortunately, I did not manage to find it in this forum.
All skills are present here but it is very difficult to synthesize.
more than this forum, we would require a knowledge base and Ultimaker does not help us to develop its machine.
I disagree, I feel Ultimaker is supporting us perfectly in hacking there machine.
f.e. here's the full documentation of the UM2, including step files ready to load into CAD;
https://github.com/Ultimaker/Ultimaker2
and here's the topic on magnetically changing heads, my summary on UM2 is on page 27;
Edited by Guest
The post "a different multi extrusion approach" that I have seen is very interesting, unfortunately, I did not manage to find it in this forum.
just tested "a different multi extrusion approach" in the search of this forum and the correct post is the 4th topic found... so I'm not sure what you did when searching ??
Thanks for your answers.
I must be very stupid but when I do it "a different multi extrusion approach" in the search windows, the result is not what you say...but no problem cause you give me the link : http://ultimaker.com/...ol-printhead-changer
Wonderful, It's probably the best way to have different heads without increase the weight.
For the documentation of UM2 I agree, I knew the site github.com and it' s a very complete documentation and I have already use it to modify some pieces. but only for mechanic.
In fact, I'm a beginner on this machine and I have a lot of question very simple for you :
How to drive the second feeder? (I already bought the motor steep) The electronic card has two outputs and connectors. Are they active ?
where can I get the electronic documentation ?
What gcode must be use ? in fact, where can I get the gcode documentation of the UM2 ?
Is there a second output for the regulation of temperature or have you do it outside of the UM2?
I promise I will read the whole topic, no doubt that some answers are already done
Again thank to reply to a novice.
If you're interested, my goal is making a head of extrusion for ceramic (it's my job 20 years ago for technical development and innovations)
I saw some achievements and projects but nothing fine for now and I think the UM2 is a good starting point.
Don't worry but the forum is not on top....for a new user ;-)
Ok, just ask if you can't find something, and please share your experiments with ceramics, love to see it...
Recommended Posts
ultiarjan 1,221
Somehow I can't paste a link on my phone... but have look at my summary om page 27 of the article "a different multi extrusion approach" in "modifications and hacks"
Link to post
Share on other sites